CENTURION wrote:bulldog2004 wrote:Heavy drizzle has left the outfield too wet. This game is becoming a joke if it hasn't already.
please don't tell me you take one day cricket seriously!
As serious as our day on the hill last weekend.
by bulldog2004 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:43 pm
CENTURION wrote:bulldog2004 wrote:Heavy drizzle has left the outfield too wet. This game is becoming a joke if it hasn't already.
please don't tell me you take one day cricket seriously!
by CENTURION » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:54 pm
bulldog2004 wrote:CENTURION wrote:bulldog2004 wrote:Heavy drizzle has left the outfield too wet. This game is becoming a joke if it hasn't already.
please don't tell me you take one day cricket seriously!
As serious as our day on the hill last weekend.
by bulldog2004 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:56 pm
CENTURION wrote:bulldog2004 wrote:CENTURION wrote:bulldog2004 wrote:Heavy drizzle has left the outfield too wet. This game is becoming a joke if it hasn't already.
please don't tell me you take one day cricket seriously!
As serious as our day on the hill last weekend.
I thought so, I had a blast!
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:09 pm
by Coach Bombay » Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:10 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Wonder if any Australian team officials had anything to do with not playing.
by stampy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:06 pm
mal wrote:The 4 LBW verdicts today
Kulasekera DRS appeal against Warner...POOR APPEAL , SL HAVE NONE LEFT
Clarke DRS appeal against Kulasekara ....AMBITIOUS , BUT ALMOST MISSED THE STUMPS
Warner LBW Perera............................INSIDE EDGE , A SHOCKER
HenREBiques LBW Herath.....................INSIDE EDGE , A SHOCKER
As for that Clarke DRS appeal
Makes a little bit of sense to me
The score was 2/50 with 40 overs to go
The best batsman in the team should have a DRS
Who is to know what would happen later in the innings
No one really complained at the time, but did when Warner and HenREBiques got out , hindsight is wonderfull
Yeah Clarke did waste an appeal in my opinion
But nothing is brought up if the umps didnt make the 2 blunders later
Imagine this though
Replays show Clarke was given out, and the ball just hit the top of middle
Imagine if it goes over the stumps, and Clarke didnt DRS ....
by Media Park » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:17 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:36 pm
Media Park wrote:Got to feel a bit for Henriques.
Not convinced he's going to be a regular player yet, but he's got an opportunity to have a good long bat in this match due to early wickets, and got dismissed with a shocking call.
Rotation policy will see him dropped for the next game, be forgotten about when a Maxwell takes a wicket and scores a quick 30, and won't play for another couple of years.
by Jim05 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:38 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Wonder if any Australian team officials had anything to do with not playing.
by Grahaml » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:27 am
by Jim05 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:33 am
by CENTURION » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:30 am
Jim05 wrote:Just take the reviews out of the players hands.
Players will always abuse any system and yes we deserved it yesterday.
I think within a couple of years every dismisal will be reviewed by the 3rd ump and batsmen will be recalled, we already see them checking every dismisal for a no-ball so that is the next progression
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:42 am
Media Park wrote:Got to feel a bit for Henriques.
Not convinced he's going to be a regular player yet, but he's got an opportunity to have a good long bat in this match due to early wickets, and got dismissed with a shocking call.
Rotation policy will see him dropped for the next game, be forgotten about when a Maxwell takes a wicket and scores a quick 30, and won't play for another couple of years.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:44 am
Jim05 wrote:Just take the reviews out of the players hands.
Players will always abuse any system and yes we deserved it yesterday.
I think within a couple of years every dismisal will be reviewed by the 3rd ump and batsmen will be recalled, we already see them checking every dismisal for a no-ball so that is the next progression
by whufc » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:46 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Media Park wrote:Got to feel a bit for Henriques.
Not convinced he's going to be a regular player yet, but he's got an opportunity to have a good long bat in this match due to early wickets, and got dismissed with a shocking call.
Rotation policy will see him dropped for the next game, be forgotten about when a Maxwell takes a wicket and scores a quick 30, and won't play for another couple of years.
Bad luck, hit the ball clean and there's no doubting.
by MightyEagles » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:21 am
by scoob » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:28 am
by Dutchy » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:15 am
by heater31 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:18 am
Dutchy wrote:Ch9 would have been spewing, had a chance to see an exciting run chase but gets called off, meanwhile there was a cracking tennis match on ch7, reckon millions would have made the move from 9 to 7 when called off.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:07 am
Dutchy wrote:Ch9 would have been spewing, had a chance to see an exciting run chase but gets called off, meanwhile there was a cracking tennis match on ch7, reckon millions would have made the move from 9 to 7 when called off.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |