Phantom Gossiper wrote:Steyn done!
What's he done?
I just went out for a coffee.. Got back for five fours and a one fifty. What a player!!
by Pup » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:35 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Steyn done!
by the joker » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:35 pm
pafc1870 wrote:test wrote:Can someone explain the new rule with runners? are they banned altogether? Poor rule I reckon, why arent they entitled to have one if they get injured during the game?
No runners at all
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:37 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Pup » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:38 pm
by the joker » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:38 pm
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:40 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by jackpot jim » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:42 pm
Brodlach wrote:test wrote:Can someone explain the new rule with runners? are they banned altogether? Poor rule I reckon, why arent they entitled to have one if they get injured during the game?
Agree, how can these two not have runners
by smac » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:48 pm
pafc1870 wrote:test wrote:Can someone explain the new rule with runners? are they banned altogether? Poor rule I reckon, why arent they entitled to have one if they get injured during the game?
No runners at all
by mal » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:50 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Brodlach wrote:test wrote:Can someone explain the new rule with runners? are they banned altogether? Poor rule I reckon, why arent they entitled to have one if they get injured during the game?
Agree, how can these two not have runners
The runner rule was one of those Geltlemanly rules inserted into the laws of cricket back from day 1 i assume. As the game of cricket has become more professional, rules have to be changed to reflect this. If a batsman gets injured, to bad to sad i reckon. Doesn't stop them from batting does it? they can still hit boundries and can still run as well, just not as quick, so be it. The runner rule has probably been abused too much over the years so i agree for the abandonment of the rule although it is only for international cricket isn't it?
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:53 pm
mal wrote:Whats going to happen when a fielder throws a ball and hits the batsman on the knee
The player is injured , and cant run , then this stoopid rule will be made to look stoopider
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:59 pm
smac wrote:pafc1870 wrote:test wrote:Can someone explain the new rule with runners? are they banned altogether? Poor rule I reckon, why arent they entitled to have one if they get injured during the game?
No runners at all
Best rule change in the history of sport.
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:01 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:02 pm
by the joker » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:04 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Tahir, what a f**king joke, he is bowling absolute poo!
Anyone know what happend to Paul Harris? I thought he did a pretty good job last time SA toured here.
by locky801 » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:04 pm
by mal » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:04 pm
by JK » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:05 pm
the joker wrote:50 more runs and micheal Clarke becomes the first man in history to score 4 double hundreds in a colander year.
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:07 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Tahir, what a f**king joke, he is bowling absolute poo!
Anyone know what happend to Paul Harris? I thought he did a pretty good job last time SA toured here.
by the joker » Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:11 pm
JK wrote:the joker wrote:50 more runs and micheal Clarke becomes the first man in history to score 4 double hundreds in a colander year.
About time we had a year of the Colander, such an underrated utensil
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |