by bloods08 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:18 pm
by mal » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:25 pm
bloods08 wrote:How come WA got to bowl 98 overs today? I thought only 96 were required?
by smithy » Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:34 pm
Grahaml wrote:Manou is a solid number 7 these days. His average will never reflect it though because his first 50 games he was so ordinary.
O'Brien is so far from a first class 5 it's not funny. I think he's either in for his bowling or not at all. We tried the half a side of all rounders thing with Mark Higgs and Jon Davison back a few years ago. We can manage with Christian at 6 if our number 8 is strong enough. If not, Christian at 7, Manou at 8 and Christian probably has to bowl a bit more.
In the race between 4,5 and 6 against 7,8 and 9 the winner was..... 7,8 and 9 173 to 30Disgusting. No doubt changes will come. And the selectors will be able to say there aren't too many putting their hand up, coupled with the WC losses of Cooper and Ferguson but a state side just can't manage without more depth than that. But let's stop for a second and think about the batting without Klinger, Blizzard, Christian and O'Brien. Manou would be just about the best home grown bat available right now.
FIX GRADE CRICKET!!!!!! FFS, tear the whole comp apart and start again with 6 or 8 sides. Forget merging etc, just start clubs anew. I realise we'll lose players and people, but in time we'll be better off. The good ones who want to help cricket in the state will stay, while we'll have a more competetive competition that should become more lucritive.
by Grahaml » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:30 pm
mal wrote:bloods08 wrote:How come WA got to bowl 98 overs today? I thought only 96 were required?
Yes would be interesting to find out why they got the extra 2 overs
WA declared 9/324 on the overnight total
I wonder what would have happened if debutant Tom Beaton was on 92 not out and not on 72 not out
Would WA have declared ?
by Grahaml » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:32 pm
mal wrote:126 needed
COULTER NILE the bowler
1. GEORGE defends
2 GEORGE works the ball to short leg
3 GEORGE leaves the ball go down leg side
4 GEORGE plays and missssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssses outside off
5 GEORGE on off stump and EDGES and caught by VOGES
F.............................................................................K
Lose with one ball remaining
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:47 pm
by hawks21 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:04 pm
redandblack wrote:Just result.
Great debut by Lyon, good effort from Smith.
Batting as per normal.
by Grahaml » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:31 pm
hawks21 wrote:redandblack wrote:Just result.
Great debut by Lyon, good effort from Smith.
Batting as per normal.
Needs to start turning these 60's into 100's! Is doing all the hard work getting starts and isnt going on with it!
Our batting line up looks terrible without Ferg in at 4 and O'brien is NOT number 5!
by redandblack » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:46 pm
redandblack wrote:Most of our batsmen struggle to score and we're whinging about Smith not turning his 50's into 100's![]()
I'm happy to give him time to work on that.
by hawks21 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:51 pm
Jim05 wrote:redandblack wrote:Most of our batsmen struggle to score and we're whinging about Smith not turning his 50's into 100's![]()
I'm happy to give him time to work on that.
Too right. If all our top 6 got to 50 regularly we would post some half decent scores
by spell_check » Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:31 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:34 pm
spell_check wrote:The only way I could find this out is to trawl through the scorecards - when was the last time the top 6 for the Redbacks all made at least 20 with four scores of 50 or more?
by Media Park » Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:15 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Bulls forever » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:56 pm
Grahaml wrote:Manou is a solid number 7 these days. His average will never reflect it though because his first 50 games he was so ordinary.
O'Brien is so far from a first class 5 it's not funny. I think he's either in for his bowling or not at all. We tried the half a side of all rounders thing with Mark Higgs and Jon Davison back a few years ago. We can manage with Christian at 6 if our number 8 is strong enough. If not, Christian at 7, Manou at 8 and Christian probably has to bowl a bit more.
In the race between 4,5 and 6 against 7,8 and 9 the winner was..... 7,8 and 9 173 to 30Disgusting. No doubt changes will come. And the selectors will be able to say there aren't too many putting their hand up, coupled with the WC losses of Cooper and Ferguson but a state side just can't manage without more depth than that. But let's stop for a second and think about the batting without Klinger, Blizzard, Christian and O'Brien. Manou would be just about the best home grown bat available right now.
FIX GRADE CRICKET!!!!!! FFS, tear the whole comp apart and start again with 6 or 8 sides. Forget merging etc, just start clubs anew. I realise we'll lose players and people, but in time we'll be better off. The good ones who want to help cricket in the state will stay, while we'll have a more competetive competition that should become more lucritive.
by spell_check » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:57 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:spell_check wrote:The only way I could find this out is to trawl through the scorecards - when was the last time the top 6 for the Redbacks all made at least 20 with four scores of 50 or more?
1995/1996
by mal » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:31 am
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:31 pm
Bulls forever wrote:Grahaml wrote:Manou is a solid number 7 these days. His average will never reflect it though because his first 50 games he was so ordinary.
O'Brien is so far from a first class 5 it's not funny. I think he's either in for his bowling or not at all. We tried the half a side of all rounders thing with Mark Higgs and Jon Davison back a few years ago. We can manage with Christian at 6 if our number 8 is strong enough. If not, Christian at 7, Manou at 8 and Christian probably has to bowl a bit more.
In the race between 4,5 and 6 against 7,8 and 9 the winner was..... 7,8 and 9 173 to 30Disgusting. No doubt changes will come. And the selectors will be able to say there aren't too many putting their hand up, coupled with the WC losses of Cooper and Ferguson but a state side just can't manage without more depth than that. But let's stop for a second and think about the batting without Klinger, Blizzard, Christian and O'Brien. Manou would be just about the best home grown bat available right now.
FIX GRADE CRICKET!!!!!! FFS, tear the whole comp apart and start again with 6 or 8 sides. Forget merging etc, just start clubs anew. I realise we'll lose players and people, but in time we'll be better off. The good ones who want to help cricket in the state will stay, while we'll have a more competetive competition that should become more lucritive.
Please change the record, this is wearing very thin, I won't go through the whole thing again about the cricket exposure that our contracted players get, suffice to say that Grade Cricket makes up less than 20% of the cricket that they play. Do your research, investigate your facts. This is brought up in every second thread. It will not happen, as for Grade Cricket becoming more lucrative, give me a break.
by whufc » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:41 pm
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:02 pm
whufc wrote:The proof that Grade cricket doesnt work is in the results the redbacks have been getting, also how many South Australian born cricketers have played test cricket for Australia in the last 15 years.
-Blewett
-Lehmann
-Gillespie
-Harris (wasnt even close until he moved to Queensland)
-Cullen (a couple of tests)
-George (not many test at all)
-Tait (at a guess less than 15 tests)
-Manou (one maybe 2 tests)
To be perfectly honest there isnt to many in the last 15 years that have missed out but deserved to get a chance ala Lehmann early in his career.
South Australian cricket is 5hite that is a fact that is proven by performance and amount of players to wear the baggy green from SA.
Some people really need to take their rose coloured glasses of and maybe South Australian cricket can then move forward. We are the laughing stock of national sport in Aus and have been for the last 10 ten or so years.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |