by Dutchy » Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:57 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:03 pm
Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.
And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:04 pm
whufc wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.
Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.
Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?
Isn't accepting the umpires decision a bigger part of the game than questioning an umpires decision
Personally I would rather see bad decisions influence a game rather than who uses a review system strategically better
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:13 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.
And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!
When was there any doubt last night?
by RustyCage » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:28 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:30 pm
by whufc » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:38 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.
Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.
Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?
Isn't accepting the umpires decision a bigger part of the game than questioning an umpires decision
Personally I would rather see bad decisions influence a game rather than who uses a review system strategically better
Have you logged in wrong? Sound like kickinit.
by stampy » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:46 pm
by Killa » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:48 pm
Dutchy wrote:How? No clear evidence on hot spot and the noise was well after the ball went past the bat. On what basis did he over rule the umpires decision?
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:04 pm
Dutchy wrote:Id like to see a limit of LBW reviews but unlimited on catches, LBW are always subjective even with hawkeye whereas catches seems pretty clear cut most of the time and where most of the howlers come from.
And if there is any doubt, like last night, give it to the batsman!
by Grahaml » Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:07 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:30 pm
Killa wrote:Dutchy wrote:How? No clear evidence on hot spot and the noise was well after the ball went past the bat. On what basis did he over rule the umpires decision?
There was conclusive evidence with hot spot front on and side on and then through the stump microphone. There was no doubt, just Dar with no guts to give it out after his blunders and let England use drs to make the decision.
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:00 pm
by cripple » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:33 pm
by RustyCage » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:44 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:13 pm
by Failed Creation » Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:30 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Was a hot spot and sound.
by The Dark Knight » Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:48 pm
by tigerpie » Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:07 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:Yep no issue with broad or Haddin for that matter.
Its the system thats the issue, the drs sole purpose was to get rid of the howler yet the biggest howler in the game still stood.
Isn't that clarke's fault for wasting a referral on an lbw appeal that would not of been out even with 4 stumps?
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:24 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |