SA Footy • View topic

by **frontfoot** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:26 am

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6231822287

for $700 mill we get more leg room than the mcg. Eat that "no" voters. :roll:

Looking pretty stupid now.

by **dedja** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:38 am

Adelaide Oval is fine as is ... absolute waste of money that the state doesn't have.

by **frontfoot** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:37 am

dedja wrote:Adelaide Oval is fine as is ... absolute waste of money that the state doesn't have.

I use to think that then I read about the leg room. :roll:

as alluded to earlier in the thread. It is just so obvious the "NO voters" had a hidden agenda to hold the state back in the 1950s.

:roll:

by **dedja** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:42 am

Don't roll your eyes at me Son ... :lol:

by **frontfoot** » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:12 pm

dedja wrote:Don't roll your eyes at me Son ...

sorry ded.

by **Dirko** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:58 pm

So the Federal Government commit 30 million for a carpark :lol:

, and yet see fit to commit 50 million to the SCG for a upgrade, when the total spend of that is 186mill.

Good work Julia ! Look after your eastern seaboard brothers.....

by **redandblack** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:38 pm

Politics thread, please, Jabber.

by **dedja** » Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:54 pm

Just wondering whether Ian McLachlan will need help wiping his arse considering everyone other than the SACA is funding their debt and fixing up stands that they have just built?

by **frontfoot** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:09 am

http://iphone.news.com.au/stories/789343

by **RustyCage** » Fri May 04, 2012 11:48 pm

http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3335&start=1860#p100863

Photos of the demolition have been posted here

by **Pottsy** » Wed May 09, 2012 1:38 pm

pafc1870 wrote:http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3335&start=1860#p100863

Photos of the demolition have been posted here

This gives Pottsy sadface.

Hope completion provides smileyface.

by **heater31** » Wed May 09, 2012 6:32 pm

Cuts to Adelaide Oval rebuild 'on the table' after SA loses $2.8bn in Federal cash

:oops:

Bit late to stop it now isn't it :roll:

by **Pottsy** » Wed May 09, 2012 7:58 pm

There goes the footbridge...

by **dedja** » Wed May 09, 2012 8:17 pm

... and the 5 super screens

by **whufc** » Wed May 09, 2012 8:45 pm

Anyone really surprised about this! always gonna be a shambles.

by **MAY-Z** » Thu May 10, 2012 10:54 am

heater31 wrote:Cuts to Adelaide Oval rebuild 'on the table' after SA loses $2.8bn in Federal cash

Bit late to stop it now isn't it

when they demolished the bradman a couple of weeks ago they were criticsised for ruching that and not giving all the assets within the buliding such as desks, filing cabinets etc to other organisations that need that could have used them.

now we no why they rushed it as there would be more pressure not to go ahead now we have even less money

by **heater31** » Thu May 10, 2012 10:59 am

Hope every South Australian is prepared for higher taxes, cuts to education/health/public transport for the next 30 years :evil:

Where are all the yes people now?

by **MAY-Z** » Thu May 10, 2012 11:03 am

heater31 wrote:Hope every South Australian is prepared for higher taxes, cuts to education/health/public transport for the next 30 years

Where are all the yes people now?

in fairness all these things arent only because of the oval, there are plenty of government wastage programs contributing

by **smac** » Thu May 10, 2012 12:10 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
heater31 wrote:[url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/south-australia-facing-a-bleak-budget/story-e6frea6u-1226350271794]Cuts to Adelaide Oval rebuild 'on the table' after SA loses $2.8bn in Federal cash[/url]

Bit late to stop it now isn't it

when they demolished the bradman a couple of weeks ago they were criticsised for ruching that and not giving all the assets within the buliding such as desks, filing cabinets etc to other organisations that need that could have used them.

now we no why they rushed it as there would be more pressure not to go ahead now we have even less money

That criticism is unfounded. I'm using a Bradman Stand desk and filing cabinet, along with my colleagues.

by **heater31** » Thu May 10, 2012 12:22 pm

smac wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
heater31 wrote:[url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/south-australia-facing-a-bleak-budget/story-e6frea6u-1226350271794]Cuts to Adelaide Oval rebuild 'on the table' after SA loses $2.8bn in Federal cash[/url]

Bit late to stop it now isn't it

when they demolished the bradman a couple of weeks ago they were criticsised for ruching that and not giving all the assets within the buliding such as desks, filing cabinets etc to other organisations that need that could have used them.

now we no why they rushed it as there would be more pressure not to go ahead now we have even less money

That criticism is unfounded. I'm using a Bradman Stand desk and filing cabinet, along with my colleagues.

Looks like the directive is take it with you or it is goes in the bin....

Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Reasons to Vote

Re: Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Re: Re: Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Who is online

Around the place

Reasons to Vote "NO"

Around the place

Join us