by cripple » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:28 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:29 pm
by CoverKing » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:30 pm
cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
by cripple » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:34 pm
CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
by jackpot jim » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:36 pm
CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
by jackpot jim » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:38 pm
cripple wrote:CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
How can anyone say he definitely hit it. we all know that cameras play tricks with angles and the like. there was no hot spot on the bat to be seen and only the one hot spot on the ball as it went to the keeper. I thought it was meant to applied for the massive howlers and IMO that was not one of them
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:44 pm
by FlyingHigh » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:56 pm
by CoverKing » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:57 pm
jackpot jim wrote:CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
What a lot of CRAP.
Good umpiring????? IF he did hit it, how is it good umpiring that the umpire gave it NOT OUT originally???
Once reviewed, there was NO DEFINITIVE evidence to overturn the decision SO how is it good umpiring?????
by cripple » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:03 pm
CoverKing wrote:jackpot jim wrote:CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
What a lot of CRAP.
Good umpiring????? IF he did hit it, how is it good umpiring that the umpire gave it NOT OUT originally???
Once reviewed, there was NO DEFINITIVE evidence to overturn the decision SO how is it good umpiring?????
JJ cripple had said bad umpiring in the box! I disagree and said good umpiring for mine!
IMO he hit it. Due to the angle of the bat after hitting the ball, hot spot could not see the edge that the ball went past! Still out because the deflection shown in the other angle, which was evident!
by RoosterMarty » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:06 pm
by RoosterMarty » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:09 pm
by locky801 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:30 pm
jackpot jim wrote:CoverKing wrote:cripple wrote:windies go from 3 down to 5 down due to bad umpiring in the box first of all and ramdin not being awake. i hope that it doesn't ruin the good work that chanderpaul and bravo had done since lunch
it was good umpiring. he definitely hit it! just hot spot could not been seen as the bat was angled away from the view being shown! Definitely good umpiring and well deserved
What a lot of CRAP.
Good umpiring????? IF he did hit it, how is it good umpiring that the umpire gave it NOT OUT originally???
Once reviewed, there was NO DEFINITIVE evidence to overturn the decision SO how is it good umpiring?????
by cripple » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:31 pm
by cripple » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:33 pm
by bloods08 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:04 pm
by jackpot jim » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:06 pm
by bloods08 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:08 pm
jackpot jim wrote:85 overs for the day is a DISGRACE. Ponting should be SUSPENDED as until the captains are, they will continue to treat the paying public with disdain.
by locky801 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:20 pm
bloods08 wrote:jackpot jim wrote:85 overs for the day is a DISGRACE. Ponting should be SUSPENDED as until the captains are, they will continue to treat the paying public with disdain.
Well said.
by Pottsy » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:34 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |