Keeping it tight.

by NFC » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:05 pm
by mal » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:11 pm
by NFC » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:13 pm
mal wrote:To all the Mitchell Johnson critics from last season who said he bowls too wide, he is not good enough etc etc where are youse ?
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
Im only interested in 1 thing beating the Indians
by locky801 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:14 pm
NFC wrote:mal wrote:To all the Mitchell Johnson critics from last season who said he bowls too wide, he is not good enough etc etc where are youse ?
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
Im only interested in 1 thing beating the Indians
Johnson takes a lot of wickets on rubbish balls though...
by NFC » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:18 pm
locky801 wrote:NFC wrote:mal wrote:To all the Mitchell Johnson critics from last season who said he bowls too wide, he is not good enough etc etc where are youse ?
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
Im only interested in 1 thing beating the Indians
Johnson takes a lot of wickets on rubbish balls though...
Not today, I think he has bowled superbly
by locky801 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:32 pm
by RoosterMarty » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:51 pm
by locky801 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:46 pm
by locky801 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:19 pm
by GWW » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:03 pm
by RustyCage » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:06 pm
GWW wrote:Now, 232/7, Ganguly out.
by best on hill » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:17 pm
pafc1870 wrote:GWW wrote:Now, 232/7, Ganguly out.
Poor decision by the ump
by RustyCage » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:22 pm
best on hill wrote:pafc1870 wrote:GWW wrote:Now, 232/7, Ganguly out.
Poor decision by the ump
was it as bad as haydens on day one
by best on hill » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:26 pm
pafc1870 wrote:best on hill wrote:pafc1870 wrote:GWW wrote:Now, 232/7, Ganguly out.
Poor decision by the ump
was it as bad as haydens on day one
Probably not, different dismissal though. Ball pitched outside off, hit the pad outside off, so cant be given out.
by stan » Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:20 pm
by locky801 » Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:04 am
by rod_rooster » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:20 am
mal wrote:To all the Mitchell Johnson critics from last season who said he bowls too wide, he is not good enough etc etc where are youse ?
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
Im only interested in 1 thing beating the Indians
by rod_rooster » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:36 am
mal wrote:
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
by rod_rooster » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:40 am
mal wrote:
Also all the WATTO/WHITE critcs how about giving them a go
WATTO 3rd test
WHITE on debut
Sometimes I get the feeling that some of youse would prefer these guys to falter instead of succeeding
Im only interested in 1 thing beating the Indians
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |