by whufc » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:08 pm
by the joker » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:12 pm
by heater31 » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:55 pm
by whufc » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:00 pm
heater31 wrote:Amazing following on Twitter. International cricketers from all teams speaking their thoughts both past and present.
by GWW » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:14 pm
by locky801 » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:14 pm
whufc wrote:heater31 wrote:Amazing following on Twitter. International cricketers from all teams speaking their thoughts both past and present.
What have been there thoughts??
I could see this as a really unfortunate very rare incident
by heater31 » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:28 pm
whufc wrote:heater31 wrote:Amazing following on Twitter. International cricketers from all teams speaking their thoughts both past and present.
What have been there thoughts??
I could see this as a really unfortunate very rare incident
by woodublieve12 » Wed Nov 26, 2014 7:35 am
by carey » Wed Nov 26, 2014 7:53 am
by woodublieve12 » Wed Nov 26, 2014 7:56 am
carey wrote:Just read the MSN Sport statement from the helmet manufacture, What a heatless pack of absolute wankers. Stating that Hughes had an old model helmet on and the 'new' updated version has protection in the area Hughes was hit.
For starters, That's bullshit. I have never seen a helmet that would protect where Hughes was hit. Not to mention Hughes is still in Hospital and these pricks are trying to sell there new helmet. IMO absolute disgrace.
For the record I don't see this as anyone's 'fault' so to speak its just a very unfortunate thing that from time to time happens, There shouldn't be any knee jerk reactions IMO.
Just hope Hughes has a full and speedy recovery, Times like this you don't even think about playing again, First and foremost is Hughes's health.
by Footy Smart » Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:30 am
by hawks21 » Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:37 am
by stan » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:20 am
hawks21 wrote:Hats off to NSW team doctor, by the sounds of it he did a great job until medics arrived.
by stan » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:20 am
woodublieve12 wrote:carey wrote:Just read the MSN Sport statement from the helmet manufacture, What a heatless pack of absolute wankers. Stating that Hughes had an old model helmet on and the 'new' updated version has protection in the area Hughes was hit.
For starters, That's bullshit. I have never seen a helmet that would protect where Hughes was hit. Not to mention Hughes is still in Hospital and these pricks are trying to sell there new helmet. IMO absolute disgrace.
For the record I don't see this as anyone's 'fault' so to speak its just a very unfortunate thing that from time to time happens, There shouldn't be any knee jerk reactions IMO.
Just hope Hughes has a full and speedy recovery, Times like this you don't even think about playing again, First and foremost is Hughes's health.
Totally agree...
by Dogwatcher » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:23 am
by stan » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:25 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Again, why is it poor? A lot of people are questioning the helmet design. Questions were posed by people in this forum about the helmet, questions have been asked by commentators about the helmet and comparisons to problems experienced in County cricket.
People are asking the question, they want to know, the media's asking.
I think people are being incredibly reactionary.
by woodublieve12 » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:26 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:31 am
stan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Again, why is it poor? A lot of people are questioning the helmet design. Questions were posed by people in this forum about the helmet, questions have been asked by commentators about the helmet and comparisons to problems experienced in County cricket.
People are asking the question, they want to know, the media's asking.
I think people are being incredibly reactionary.
Maybe wait til we know if he is ok before saying tgis wouldn't of happened if he wore our new helmet. Comes across as a bit of opportunist advertising.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |