by Coach Bombay » Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:19 am
by CoverKing » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:57 am
by catchisthecry » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:13 am
by Media Park » Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:25 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by stampy » Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:20 am
by stampy » Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:25 am
by Jim05 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:14 pm
stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
by GWW » Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:06 pm
by locky801 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:17 pm
stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
by stampy » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:23 pm
GWW wrote:As bad as our batting was this year, I'm not sure we were significantly worse than most years this decade.
We are shocking, but have been that way for the greater part of the last 5 or perhaps even 10 years.
What year were we out for 20-odd? About 5 seasons ago from memory.
by stampy » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:27 pm
stampy wrote:GWW wrote:As bad as our batting was this year, I'm not sure we were significantly worse than most years this decade.
We are shocking, but have been that way for the greater part of the last 5 or perhaps even 10 years.
What year were we out for 20-odd? About 5 seasons ago from memory.
04/05?
by Stumps » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:05 pm
Jim05 wrote:stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
Yes i have seen the same.
Plenty of times this year ive seen sides make barely 100
by heater31 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:45 pm
Stumps wrote:Jim05 wrote:stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
Yes i have seen the same.
Plenty of times this year ive seen sides make barely 100
The standard of bowling has gotten a lot worse too. Sides even in the late 90's would pile on huge scores against some of the current grade attacks
by whufc » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:59 pm
heater31 wrote:Stumps wrote:Jim05 wrote:stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
Yes i have seen the same.
Plenty of times this year ive seen sides make barely 100
The standard of bowling has gotten a lot worse too. Sides even in the late 90's would pile on huge scores against some of the current grade attacks
That is a reflection on 2 things. The standard of facilities at grade grounds is diabolical. Grounds with A grade programmed on it can't even get the covers on in time or correctly![]()
the 2nd is today's society, if a kid is not pushing state selection by 23/24 they say 'Stuff it I'm going to spend Saturdays at the Beach and not Salisbury Oval on a stinking hot day'
by stampy » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:40 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:52 pm
by gadj1976 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:27 pm
catchisthecry wrote:Just horrific.
Klinger and Cooper had good years numbers wise (both in top 8 in SS) but were inconsistent. Both only made 1 x 200 and no other centuries.
Christian started the year at Number 6 and made a couple of centuries, was great to see him rewarded with a spot in the ODI side.
Ferg the major disappointment, too good to be averaging 32, but not getting any younger, may have missed the Aussie boat.
A fair indication of where we are at is the talk about Head and Stray.. averaged mid 20s!
wouldn't cut the mustard in anyother state
Batting averages (took out the bowlers)
Matches Inns NOs Runs HS Average 100s 50s
DT Christian 5 9 1 475 131* 59.37 2 1
M Klinger 10 19 1 835 219* 46.38 1 4
TLW Cooper 10 19 2 756 203* 44.47 1 4
AW O'Brien 2 4 2 71 51* 35.50 0 1
CJ Ferguson 8 15 0 486 126 32.40 1 3
TM Head 4 8 0 219 90 27.37 0 2
TD Stray 5 10 0 260 90 26.00 0 2
DJ Harris 6 11 0 278 89 25.27 0 3
CB Bailey 3 5 1 90 42 22.50 0 0
AJ Crosthwaite 5 10 0 213 54 21.30 0 1
JD Smith 4 7 0 107 76 15.28 0 1
TC Thornton 2 4 0 56 24 14.00 0 0
TP Ludeman 3 5 2 41 35* 13.66 0 0
AC Blizzard 3 5 0 63 46 12.60 0 0
BL Dougall 2 4 0 46 23 11.50 0 0
TP Doropoulos 2 3 0 24 13 8.00 0 0
TJ Davey 2 3 0 10 6 3.33 0 0
by whufc » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:23 pm
gadj1976 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Just horrific.
Klinger and Cooper had good years numbers wise (both in top 8 in SS) but were inconsistent. Both only made 1 x 200 and no other centuries.
Christian started the year at Number 6 and made a couple of centuries, was great to see him rewarded with a spot in the ODI side.
Ferg the major disappointment, too good to be averaging 32, but not getting any younger, may have missed the Aussie boat.
A fair indication of where we are at is the talk about Head and Stray.. averaged mid 20s!
wouldn't cut the mustard in anyother state
Batting averages (took out the bowlers)
Matches Inns NOs Runs HS Average 100s 50s
DT Christian 5 9 1 475 131* 59.37 2 1
M Klinger 10 19 1 835 219* 46.38 1 4
TLW Cooper 10 19 2 756 203* 44.47 1 4
AW O'Brien 2 4 2 71 51* 35.50 0 1
CJ Ferguson 8 15 0 486 126 32.40 1 3
TM Head 4 8 0 219 90 27.37 0 2
TD Stray 5 10 0 260 90 26.00 0 2
DJ Harris 6 11 0 278 89 25.27 0 3
CB Bailey 3 5 1 90 42 22.50 0 0
AJ Crosthwaite 5 10 0 213 54 21.30 0 1
JD Smith 4 7 0 107 76 15.28 0 1
TC Thornton 2 4 0 56 24 14.00 0 0
TP Ludeman 3 5 2 41 35* 13.66 0 0
AC Blizzard 3 5 0 63 46 12.60 0 0
BL Dougall 2 4 0 46 23 11.50 0 0
TP Doropoulos 2 3 0 24 13 8.00 0 0
TJ Davey 2 3 0 10 6 3.33 0 0
I'd be interested to know what the first inning average vs second inning average is.
by bloods08 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:00 pm
by the star » Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:37 am
stampy wrote:i may be totally off track but when i cast my eyes over the district scores in the mail, nobody is making centuries, no club seems to able to score 300, years ago there were guys like bradbrook? making tons of runs at district level and other names who escape me but these days the scores are nothing like they used to get and yes i know some rounds are 50 overs a side
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |