Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby godoubleblues » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:23 pm

maybe we should treat the 20/20 comps like we treat the rugby 7s
pick a team that is suited to the format
User avatar
godoubleblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6063
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Littlehampton
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Millicent

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby Pup » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:39 pm

godoubleblues wrote:maybe we should treat the 20/20 comps like we treat the rugby 7s
pick a team that is suited to the format


Of course we should. You pick the best side for that form of the game. The problem is i think they think they did pick the best side.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby mal » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:40 pm

OK
my selection criteria for batsman in 20/20 cricket
no who should be in or out just whats required

OPENERS
batters who can hit over the infield in the first 6 overs

MIDDLE ORDER BATSMEN
batters who can hit sixes at will, and play shots from ball 1

BATTERS FROM 6-8
batters who will face overs 15 -20
need to bash from ball one

TYPES OF BATSMAN NEEDED
batters who can bash spinners over the fence

SUMMARY
you dont pick the best batsman you pick the best bashers
you pick batsman that score at a ratio of 20 runs minimum per first 15 balls faced
too may aussie batters push too many deleveries at the start of innings

______________________________________________________________________________
YOU CLASSIFY A GOOD BATSMAN IN 20/20 BY STRIKE RATES NOT BATTING AVERAGES
______________________________________________________________________________


PUP
Any batsman batting 3 and making 0[1] does affect the winning chance of the team

Also the gap between International 20/20 aust batsmen and domestic 20/2o batsmen is very mini MAL

HUGHES
HODGE
CARSELDINE
BIRT
REARDON
BAILEY
CHRISTIAN
RONCHI

That batting line up would be as good in 20/20 crash bash wham slam cricket as we have now

HOWEVER
The gap between International Test batsman and Shield batters is far greater
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby ORDoubleBlues » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:42 pm

And why isn't Ryan Harris figuring for this format?
R.I.P. Patrice Lumumba 1925 - 1961
User avatar
ORDoubleBlues
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Wisanger

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby Pup » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:13 pm

mal wrote:PUP
Any batsman batting 3 and making 0[1] does affect the winning chance of the team

Also the gap between International 20/20 aust batsmen and domestic 20/2o batsmen is very mini MAL

HUGHES
HODGE
CARSELDINE
BIRT
REARDON
BAILEY
CHRISTIAN
RONCHI


Yes of course if your number 3 fails then it affects you but in this format when your number 3 has made a golden duck then it is far more beneficial than making 0 from 5/6 or 10 from 15 as you say. This is an international cricket side surely we can rely on our 4/5 and 6 to score some runs or at least we should be able too.

I realise strike rates are important but so are the players abilities to go on and make a score. For example i would much rather have these 4 players

Brad Hodge 2288 @ 41 (131 SR)
Cameron White 1187 @ 33.91 (150 SR)
Lee Carseldine 420 @ 42 (130 SR)
Dan Harris 382 @ 34.72 (150 SR)

than these 4

Travis Birt 422 @ 21.10 (138 SR)
Dan Christian 244 @ 16.26 (142 SR)
Reardon 255 @ 18.21 (126 SR)
Crosthwaite 303 @ 25 (149 SR)

While Hodge and Carseldine may have a lower strike rate you know they nearly always make a good score and guide their side to a total once they get a start. I would happily sacrifice that extra 18 on Crosthwaites SR if i knew he could compile scores like Hodge.

Personally i think Reardon is over rated, can a hit a great ball but just does not seem to do it consistently. Does not bat that quickly and has a pretty dismal record apart from 1 or 2 classy innings. How Hodge and White were left out amazes me. Pick the squad that will win the tournament.!
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby gadj1976 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:28 pm

MatteeG wrote:Didnt see last nights game but it was painfully obvious v WI that the Aussie side was NOT selected specifically for T20...

Lee and Johnson definitely NOT T20 bowlers
Ponting and Clarke definitely NOT T20 batsmen

This is not a sledge, these guys are just suited to longer forms of the game.

*ducks*


well said Mattee, I couldn't agree more.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9350
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 827 times
Been liked: 898 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby Gozu » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:11 am

mal wrote:CLARKE
13[22]
11[15]


I think 13 (22) is what Clarke did for the whole tournament. He scored:

2 (7) vs. West Indies &
11 (15) vs. Sri Lanka
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13858
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 682 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby mal » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:29 am

Gozu wrote:
mal wrote:CLARKE
13[22]
11[15]


I think 13 (22) is what Clarke did for the whole tournament. He scored:

2 (7) vs. West Indies &
11 (15) vs. Sri Lanka


GOZU Yes u r right i got his innings jumbled up
13[22] total, I guess if I batted 10 for Scotland/Ireland/Nanneslands I would be content with scores like that

CLARKE RATINGS

TESTS... 8.8.......Good test player, quite possibly our best batsman now that the skipper is aging
50/50.....7-3.......8-3 rating if opens 6-3 in middle order , does a job, fields very well, handy bowler, bats OK
20/20.....2.5........needs to eat more Weet Bix
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby the joker » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:34 am

mal wrote:
Gozu wrote:
mal wrote:CLARKE
13[22]
11[15]


I think 13 (22) is what Clarke did for the whole tournament. He scored:

2 (7) vs. West Indies &
11 (15) vs. Sri Lanka


GOZU Yes u r right i got his innings jumbled up
13[22] total, I guess if I batted 10 for Scotland/Ireland/Nanneslands I would be content with scores like that

CLARKE RATINGS

TESTS... 8.8.......Good test player, quite possibly our best batsman now that the skipper is aging
50/50.....7-3.......8-3 rating if opens 6-3 in middle order , does a job, fields very well, handy bowler, bats OK
20/20.....2.5........needs to eat more Weet Bix
bats ok, he has been outstanding.
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby The Jack » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:09 pm

Carseldine is an out and out gun in this format of the game! Every time I've seen him, whether it be IPL or KFC, he has absolutely smashed em! While not normally inclined to promote a banana-bender's case (God took the best state in the world and filled it with Queenslanders, just for balance!), it's a travesty that he is not in the side. It appears to me that the senior players of the Test and ODI squads have too much say in selection of 20/20 squads. They know it is the most lucrative form of the game, and want to keep their snouts in the trough. Playing international 20/20s gives them something else for their resume when it comes to getting picked up by an IPL team. The selectors need to harden the duck up and make some tough calls. Really starting to p!ss me off they are! :evil:
User avatar
The Jack
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: On the Couch
Has liked: 40 times
Been liked: 18 times
Grassroots Team: Hummocks-Watchman

Re: Australia vs. Sri Lanka-World T20

Postby westcoastpanther » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:12 pm

The Jack wrote:Carseldine is an out and out gun in this format of the game! Every time I've seen him, whether it be IPL or KFC, he has absolutely smashed em! While not normally inclined to promote a banana-bender's case (God took the best state in the world and filled it with Queenslanders, just for balance!), it's a travesty that he is not in the side. It appears to me that the senior players of the Test and ODI squads have too much say in selection of 20/20 squads. They know it is the most lucrative form of the game, and want to keep their snouts in the trough. Playing international 20/20s gives them something else for their resume when it comes to getting picked up by an IPL team. The selectors need to harden the duck up and make some tough calls. Really starting to p!ss me off they are! :evil:


That is a very interesting comment and while we have no facts, it makes a lot of sense. Have they put themselves ahead of their country??
Hi, My name is Ron 'Bluey' Dunn. Did you know I played in the 61 & 62 Tasman Premiership sides....
User avatar
westcoastpanther
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5489
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Weipa
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 150 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Previous

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |