4th Test: India v Australia at Nagpur

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: 4th Test: India v Australia at Nagpur

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:56 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Ok I got the delivery wrong, it was over the wicket...anyway I still think it was very close, as did the umpire it seems

And its only my opinion that the rule should change if you dont play a shot you should lose the benefit of the doubt...you have a bat use it


Fair enough. Personally i think the rule is fine as it is. If there is doubt as to whether a batsman is out in any fashion the batsman should always get the benefit of that doubt IMHO.


i disagree if you pad up and get given out lbwyou can have no complaints as afar as im concerned

people on here have been going on about how hard it has been to take wickets and the pitches are all roads well here is a way to put some advantage back to the bowlers


Well that's not the rule so what you are advocating is a rule change.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: 4th Test: India v Australia at Nagpur

Postby MAY-Z » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:05 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Ok I got the delivery wrong, it was over the wicket...anyway I still think it was very close, as did the umpire it seems

And its only my opinion that the rule should change if you dont play a shot you should lose the benefit of the doubt...you have a bat use it


Fair enough. Personally i think the rule is fine as it is. If there is doubt as to whether a batsman is out in any fashion the batsman should always get the benefit of that doubt IMHO.


i disagree if you pad up and get given out lbwyou can have no complaints as afar as im concerned

people on here have been going on about how hard it has been to take wickets and the pitches are all roads well here is a way to put some advantage back to the bowlers


Well that's not the rule so what you are advocating is a rule change.



not really cos the batsman getting the benefit of the doubt isnt an official rule anywhere
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: 4th Test: India v Australia at Nagpur

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:32 pm

True "benefit of the doubt" is not mentioned in exact terms but you will find that the MCC do say in relation to the umpire that "if he cannot be sure the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps, he cannot support the appeal".

Really just a different way of saying he should give the batsman the benefit of the doubt.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Previous

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |