Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby scoob » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:56 am

Chuck Wepner wrote:
scoob wrote:
Chuck Wepner wrote:The only problem is, we are seriously lacking young batting talent in this country. Even Khawaja hasn't really earned his spot yet and he is probably the pick of them... I think Hussey, Haddin and Ponting still add value & their experience shouldn't just be thrown away all at once.


A lot of people said David Warner hadn't proved his worth yet either. But maybe you have a point - retain either ponting or hussey at 5/6 and promote Cowan and bring back watto and Marsh... Its ok to go full on young with the bowling line up but we need to continue with only experience batsmen? Why?


Hussey and Ponting are two of the best fielders in world cricket. Both are proven batsmen currently out of form - doesn't mean they won't regain it. I remember just over 12 months ago the same great Aussie knockers were calling for Hussey's head - he was easily our best batsman only last summer. If they are to be replaced, it must be by a player who is in outstanding 1st class form - Australian Test sides should not be selected on the basis of age - Warner is a must keep and the bowling looks ok. We must keep at least one or two proven, experienced batsmen or India will embarrass us !


Embarass us?!?!?!?!? I would think getting trashed 3-1 at home by a team that hadn't won a series in Australia for 20+ years is an embarassment, getting bowled out for 47 then losing by 8 wickets after leading on the first innings is an embarassment, getting beaten on our home deck by the 8th rank test playing national, who haven't won a test in Australia for 20+ years is an embarassment... these blokes are getting embarassed constantly. But why change? Why give the young guys a go when the older players are doing so well? These youngs blokes have really struggled since they have been given a chance - Marsh, Lyon, Cummings, Pattison, Warner... :roll:
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby MAY-Z » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:00 am

Dutchy wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Guess we should keep ponting since he made a half century in brisbane. He is in such good form.

I dont see why we wouldnt play cowan (in outstanding form), watson and marsh if all fit. drop hughes, ponting and hussey.

Ponting HAS to go. May as well get games into some one else considering he is continue to fail.


Ponting is averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, what has he done wrong apart from being Australia's best batsmen since Bradman?


just because he is a north melbourne supporter you think he is in sublime form

what has he done right since the hobart test of 2010? he has a batting average of 27 over 17 tests in the same time katich averaged 46, even hughes has a higher average
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:19 am

scoob wrote:
Chuck Wepner wrote:
scoob wrote:
Chuck Wepner wrote:The only problem is, we are seriously lacking young batting talent in this country. Even Khawaja hasn't really earned his spot yet and he is probably the pick of them... I think Hussey, Haddin and Ponting still add value & their experience shouldn't just be thrown away all at once.


A lot of people said David Warner hadn't proved his worth yet either. But maybe you have a point - retain either ponting or hussey at 5/6 and promote Cowan and bring back watto and Marsh... Its ok to go full on young with the bowling line up but we need to continue with only experience batsmen? Why?


Hussey and Ponting are two of the best fielders in world cricket. Both are proven batsmen currently out of form - doesn't mean they won't regain it. I remember just over 12 months ago the same great Aussie knockers were calling for Hussey's head - he was easily our best batsman only last summer. If they are to be replaced, it must be by a player who is in outstanding 1st class form - Australian Test sides should not be selected on the basis of age - Warner is a must keep and the bowling looks ok. We must keep at least one or two proven, experienced batsmen or India will embarrass us !


Embarass us?!?!?!?!? These youngs blokes have really struggled since they have been given a chance - Marsh, Lyon, Cummings, Pattison, Warner... :roll:


2 are out injured, and the other 3 have played 2 tests against the 8th ranked test side. Why not mention the failures? Khawaja, Hughes, Starc just from this series.

Ponting and Hussey have a few tickets up there sleeve.

All great eras come to an end. It happened with the West indies, it has happened with Australia. It happened with Port, Sturt, and will happen with Centrals.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby scoob » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:38 am

The Sleeping Giant wrote:2 are out injured, and the other 3 have played 2 tests against the 8th ranked test side. Why not mention the failures? Khawaja, Hughes, Starc just from this series.

Ponting and Hussey have a few tickets up there sleeve.

All great eras come to an end. It happened with the West indies, it has happened with Australia. It happened with Port, Sturt, and will happen with Centrals.


And performed, unlike others in the side who didn't perform... all eras end -I understrand that by why live in the past and hang on to past glories - how will that benefit us in 2 years time?

Hughes not up to it - Khawaja was pretty was much opening the batting (also got run out by Ponting) and starc probably not quite there yet - you can't expect every young player to come in to perform but you have to at least give them a chance. Can you say that Ponting will perform better than Marsh, Hughes better than Cowan, Hussey better than Watson - if they are at least 50-50 propositions I would think going with the younger option would be more beneficial in the long run.

I hope like hell that ponting and hussey turn their form around if they get picked - I would love to see them demolish the indians, but I dont want to go through the whole pick players because they once played well ala Mitchell Johnson... hoping they will return into some form.
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Dutchy » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:37 am

MAY-Z wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Guess we should keep ponting since he made a half century in brisbane. He is in such good form.

I dont see why we wouldnt play cowan (in outstanding form), watson and marsh if all fit. drop hughes, ponting and hussey.

Ponting HAS to go. May as well get games into some one else considering he is continue to fail.


Ponting is averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, what has he done wrong apart from being Australia's best batsmen since Bradman?


just because he is a north melbourne supporter you think he is in sublime form

what has he done right since the hobart test of 2010? he has a batting average of 27 over 17 tests in the same time katich averaged 46, even hughes has a higher average


Ha, what has North Melbourne got to do with it :lol: :lol:

If that was the case Id be harping on about Siddle also.....seriously.

Ever thought of what else he brings to the team in the form of fielding and leadership for the young guys?

Again no one can tell me who you replace him with and earnt the right to replace the 2nd best batsmen this country has produced.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45938
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2571 times
Been liked: 4181 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Ruben Carter » Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:56 pm

how old is Tendulkar??? Should he also be sacked?
If you don’t like my words, don’t listen. If you don’t like my appearance, don’t look. If you don’t like my actions, turn your head; It’s as simple as that.
User avatar
Ruben Carter
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:40 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 75 times
Grassroots Team: Westminster OS

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby scoob » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:06 pm

Ruben Carter wrote:how old is Tendulkar??? Should he also be sacked?


Tendulkar 38 years old : 2008 - 2011 he averages 62.95

Ponting 37 years old tomorrow : 2008 - 2011 he averages 37.13

Hussey 36 years old : 2008 - 2011 he averages 40.20
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Pup » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:01 pm

Ruben Carter wrote:how old is Tendulkar??? Should he also be sacked?


Get a grip its about form not age and Hussey and Ponting are clearly on a downward spiral.

Sachin is not.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
User avatar
Pup
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:09 am
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby jackpot jim » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:07 pm

Whats Tendulkers ave. away from the Batting paradises in the sub continent in recent years?
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6263
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby jackpot jim » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:15 pm

Sensational win by New Zealand, to have the mental strength not to give up when all looked lost (Aust only needed another 100 with 8 wickets in hand).
Wouldn't be a bad idea for some of Australias' batsmen to have a look at the fight and determination shown by New Zealand in the field.

This loss could be the best thing that has happened to Australia as it could hasten the regeneration of the side which will ultimatley lead to their return to the TOP.
jackpot jim
Coach
 
Posts: 6263
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 pm
Has liked: 433 times
Been liked: 512 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Media Park » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:35 pm

jackpot jim wrote:Whats Tendulkers ave. away from the Batting paradises in the sub continent in recent years?

Still fine. I will go and get a number for you though... :D
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:38 pm

jackpot jim wrote:Whats Tendulkers ave. away from the Batting paradises in the sub continent in recent years?


Averaging 26.45 away from sub continent in the last 5 years.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Media Park » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:41 pm

TSG? His last three series (excluding Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh):

Tendulkar by series outside of the subcontinent, going backwards:

in England 273 runs @ 34.12 (two fifties, eight innings)
in South Af 326 @ 81.50 (two centuries)
in New Zealand 344 @ 68.18 (one hundred, two fifties)

The series before that was 07/08 against Australia, and if I post those stats, your argument looks really bad mate.... :D
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
User avatar
Media Park
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13864
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby westozfalcon » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:14 pm

Ruben Carter wrote:

By being stubborn and hanging on he his doing himself a disservice and putting unfair pressure on the selectors
that is a ridiculous post. Selectors are paid to make the tough calls...[/quote]

The point I was making was that a player of Ricky Ponting's calibre does not deserve to suffer the ignominy of being dropped from the side. Out of sheer respect for an all-time great of Australian cricket the selectors will naturally hold off as long as possible before they let the axe fall but Ponting is forcing their hand by refusing to acknowledge that his time is up.
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Perth WA
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby CoverKing » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:27 am

Dutchy wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Guess we should keep ponting since he made a half century in brisbane. He is in such good form.

I dont see why we wouldnt play cowan (in outstanding form), watson and marsh if all fit. drop hughes, ponting and hussey.

Ponting HAS to go. May as well get games into some one else considering he is continue to fail.


Ponting is averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, what has he done wrong apart from being Australia's best batsmen since Bradman?


just because he is a north melbourne supporter you think he is in sublime form

what has he done right since the hobart test of 2010? he has a batting average of 27 over 17 tests in the same time katich averaged 46, even hughes has a higher average


Ha, what has North Melbourne got to do with it :lol: :lol:

If that was the case Id be harping on about Siddle also.....seriously.

Ever thought of what else he brings to the team in the form of fielding and leadership for the young guys?

Again no one can tell me who you replace him with and earnt the right to replace the 2nd best batsmen this country has produced.


Yes he provides leadership, but look at what someone like a Warner can do.

Cowan is averaging above 56 in first class cricket in 2011. He should be opening with Warner. He has also made scores in both of Australia A games in the last two years.

Watson can then bat down the order. Plus when Marsh is fit, he should be in the side.
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Bum Crack » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:36 am

didn't that Micky Arthur guarantee on the news last night that Ponting and Hussey will play in the boxing day test?? Get rid of em FFS.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Bum Crack
Coach
 
Posts: 7943
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Here
Has liked: 325 times
Been liked: 909 times
Grassroots Team: Berri

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby CoverKing » Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:31 am

Dutchy wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Guess we should keep ponting since he made a half century in brisbane. He is in such good form.

I dont see why we wouldnt play cowan (in outstanding form), watson and marsh if all fit. drop hughes, ponting and hussey.

Ponting HAS to go. May as well get games into some one else considering he is continue to fail.


Ponting is averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, what has he done wrong apart from being Australia's best batsmen since Bradman?


just because he is a north melbourne supporter you think he is in sublime form

what has he done right since the hobart test of 2010? he has a batting average of 27 over 17 tests in the same time katich averaged 46, even hughes has a higher average


Ha, what has North Melbourne got to do with it :lol: :lol:

If that was the case Id be harping on about Siddle also.....seriously.

Ever thought of what else he brings to the team in the form of fielding and leadership for the young guys?

Again no one can tell me who you replace him with and earnt the right to replace the 2nd best batsmen this country has produced.


Averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, but averaging under 25 in his last 4 test digs
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Dutchy » Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:08 pm

CoverKing wrote:Averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, but averaging under 25 in his last 4 test digs


Huh?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 45938
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2571 times
Been liked: 4181 times

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby Swamp Donkey » Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:09 pm

Can we start another thread? Im sick of being reminded of our performance in Hobart everytime I see this topic in the 'active topics' list. :oops:
User avatar
Swamp Donkey
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:02 am
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 129 times
Grassroots Team: Wunkar

Re: Second test, Aust vs NZ hobart starting Friday

Postby CoverKing » Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:35 pm

Dutchy wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Averaging over 40 in his last 4 digs, but averaging under 25 in his last 4 test digs


Huh?


The last 4 Test matches I meant. Typo*
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Previous

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |