by Drop Bear » Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:39 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:46 pm
by Johno6 » Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:54 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:34 pm
Johno6 wrote:i decided im going for india.........(refer below)
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8230777
by BoundaryRider84 » Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:51 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Johno6 wrote:i decided im going for india.........(refer below)
http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8230777
Self promotion is alive and well and living in India.
by saintal » Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:49 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Brodlach wrote:Mentioned on the radio (a number of times) this morning that Tendulka was given out LBW on 23 but was overturned on review. According to them they thought the hawke eye graphics may have been altered to show it just clipping leg stump instead of hitting leg and clipping middle. Umpire Gould was apparently dismayed the decision was over turned. Did anyone see this?
The wife and I were appalled, it was severely doctored, it was as plum as it comes and hawkeye's trajectory was a huge curve. Disgusting, Gould shook his head in disgust when he seen it on the big screen.
by RustyCage » Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:00 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:33 am
pafc1870 wrote:It's all rubbish. Tendulkar indicates to the other batsman that he thinks it was going down legside, the ball has pitched outside off and hit him in front of middle, and was missing leg. Of coure the umpire is going to think he initially made the right decision originally.
by RustyCage » Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:07 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:pafc1870 wrote:It's all rubbish. Tendulkar indicates to the other batsman that he thinks it was going down legside, the ball has pitched outside off and hit him in front of middle, and was missing leg. Of coure the umpire is going to think he initially made the right decision originally.
I'm not sold mate, I reckon hawkeye's arc is misleading and incorrect. Each to their own I guess.
by CoverKing » Sat Apr 02, 2011 11:57 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:pafc1870 wrote:It's all rubbish. Tendulkar indicates to the other batsman that he thinks it was going down legside, the ball has pitched outside off and hit him in front of middle, and was missing leg. Of coure the umpire is going to think he initially made the right decision originally.
I'm not sold mate, I reckon hawkeye's arc is misleading and incorrect. Each to their own I guess.
I'm ignoring the arc. The thing that hawkeye people can't manipulate is where the ball pitched and where it hit Tendulkars pad.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |