SA Footy

Vamos wrote:

Point man wrote:District by 10 goals over goodys. Midfield was far too strong never letting goodys into the game. Hopefully it's played at norwood with the smaller ground suiting dizzys.

Massive crowd too, Districts were clinical. Tipping they'll play PAC

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Vamos wrote:

Point man wrote:District by 10 goals over goodys. Midfield was far too strong never letting goodys into the game. Hopefully it's played at norwood with the smaller ground suiting dizzys.

Massive crowd too, Districts were clinical. Tipping they'll play PAC

I watched the game last night
You'd be foolish to think Goody Saints would play like that 2 weeks in a row
Mind you: Dizzies made them play like that - as you said clinical - they were everywhere.

Gone from suspect to outright favourites in my book

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Vamos wrote:

Point man wrote:District by 10 goals over goodys. Midfield was far too strong never letting goodys into the game. Hopefully it's played at norwood with the smaller ground suiting dizzys.

Massive crowd too, Districts were clinical. Tipping they'll play PAC

I watched the game last night
You'd be foolish to think Goody Saints would play like that 2 weeks in a row
Mind you: Dizzies made them play like that - as you said clinical - they were everywhere.

Gone from suspect to outright favourites in my book

You guys seem to be cherry ripe at the right time, hopefully you get up so I can have a few coldies with you at the GF.

Executive Member wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:You guys seem to be cherry ripe at the right time, hopefully you get up so I can have a few coldies with you at the GF.

trying to get an invite into the Corporate suite

Goanna wrote:Are div1 teams aligned with specific SANFL clubs ? (besides Port)

heater31 wrote:

Goanna wrote:Are div1 teams aligned with specific SANFL clubs ? (besides Port)

Yes

It would depend on where each club's home ground sits in the SANFL zone system.

Footy Chick wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Goanna wrote:Are div1 teams aligned with specific SANFL clubs ? (besides Port)

Yes

It would depend on where each club's home ground sits in the SANFL zone system.

But they're not affiliated as such - for example Brock Castree playing for Centrals but came from PAOC

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

We have a lot of ex-boarders at North and Glenelg because of the zones

Jimmy_041 wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

We have a lot of ex-boarders at North and Glenelg because of the zones

Footy Chick wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

Not like in the olden days, when we would have kids on the sturt list wanting to play with us but Sturt would make them go to Scotch OC

jo172 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

Not like in the olden days, when we would have kids on the sturt list wanting to play with us but Sturt would make them go to Scotch OC

On this my impression is that the SANFL Clubs seem far far less minded to encourage players to return to anything other than their junior clubs.

It still goes on - they recommend that they go to a higher club

Think they've worked out the importance of the symbiotic relationship/risk of biting the hand that feeds.

jo172 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

Not like in the olden days, when we would have kids on the sturt list wanting to play with us but Sturt would make them go to Scotch OC

On this my impression is that the SANFL Clubs seem far far less minded to encourage players to return to anything other than their junior clubs.

It still goes on - they recommend that they go to a higher club

Think they've worked out the importance of the symbiotic relationship/risk of biting the hand that feeds.

am Bays wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

We have a lot of ex-boarders at North and Glenelg because of the zones

Dont pay the Perryman, dont even Pitt a price....

Jimmy_041 wrote:

jo172 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

Not like in the olden days, when we would have kids on the sturt list wanting to play with us but Sturt would make them go to Scotch OC

On this my impression is that the SANFL Clubs seem far far less minded to encourage players to return to anything other than their junior clubs.

It still goes on - they recommend that they go to a higher club

Think they've worked out the importance of the symbiotic relationship/risk of biting the hand that feeds.

am Bays wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

jo172 wrote:Need to treat the Old Colls sides a bit different on that basis.

For simple reasons of the flow of juniors backwards and forwards PNU and TTG are going to develop a close relationship with Norwood, Glenunga with Sturt, Brighton with Glenelg, Goodwood with West etc.

Obviously it's never going to be perfect, but for example, if someone gives Garry McIntosh a call and he looks good at a couple of PNU trainings he tends to find his way out to Norwood pretty quickly.

We have a lot of ex-boarders at North and Glenelg because of the zones

Dont pay the Perryman, dont even Pitt a price....

That's very good - begs the question how Trengove got to Sturt.
I think his parents have a house on Osmond Tce

heater31 wrote:

Goanna wrote:Are div1 teams aligned with specific SANFL clubs ? (besides Port)

Yes

It would depend on where each club's home ground sits in the SANFL zone system.

Bluedemon wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:
That's very good - begs the question how Trengove got to Sturt.
I think his parents have a house on Osmond Tce

I dont think Glenelg wanted him, and when you get to Under 15's level, if you want to move to another SANFL club, the 2 clubs can do a deal by a trade of players or pay a transfer fee