Page 1 of 1

New entries 2020

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 10:58 pm
by Footy Chick
Having read the agenda for the upcoming Delegates Meeting, it looks like the following clubs have applied to the league for 2020

Salisbury West
Hackham
North Pines

Discuss.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 11:08 pm
by Chappy
Can only comment on Hackham.

They seem to be working pretty hard to turn the club around. I hope they are given the green light.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 11:34 pm
by LaughingKookaburra
Are Hackham still shoe ins to win the div 5 or 6 flag with their current side like what was suggested last year?

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 11:47 pm
by Trader
Footy Chick wrote:Salisbury West
Hackham
North Pines


Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues.

I'm all for the Adelaide Footy League expanding, but with 65 odd clubs already, it's not like we are in strife and need numbers for the sake of numbers. I'd happily pass on these three and not pick up the problems that come with them.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 8:58 am
by shoe boy
Trader wrote:
Footy Chick wrote:Salisbury West
Hackham
North Pines


Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues.

I'm all for the Adelaide Footy League expanding, but with 65 odd clubs already, it's not like we are in strife and need numbers for the sake of numbers. I'd happily pass on these three and not pick up the problems that come with them.


No behavioral issues at Hackham .

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 9:35 am
by jo172
Trader wrote:
Footy Chick wrote:Salisbury West
Hackham
North Pines


Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues
Behavioral issues.

I'm all for the Adelaide Footy League expanding, but with 65 odd clubs already, it's not like we are in strife and need numbers for the sake of numbers. I'd happily pass on these three and not pick up the problems that come with them.


Agree, be nice to get to an even 70 clubs for the 7 grades, but not if it causes more headaches.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:05 am
by Dutchy
Hackham 2 years ago were told to go back to SFL C grade and have 2 clean years and reapply, which they have done to my knowledge. Lost the C grade GF last year and are 12-0 this year but can't see them doing much more than Lonsdale/Marion.

They also have the option of being the 10th team in the SFL B grade in 2020 apparently.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:48 pm
by lion heart
Dutchy wrote:Hackham 2 years ago were told to go back to SFL C grade and have 2 clean years and reapply, which they have done to my knowledge. Lost the C grade GF last year and are 12-0 this year but can't see them doing much more than Lonsdale/Marion.

They also have the option of being the 10th team in the SFL B grade in 2020 apparently.


There was a nasty incident involving Hackham against your club late last year Dutchy. I am told Hackham's preference is to play in the SFL reserves comp.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 4:49 pm
by Dutchy
lion heart wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Hackham 2 years ago were told to go back to SFL C grade and have 2 clean years and reapply, which they have done to my knowledge. Lost the C grade GF last year and are 12-0 this year but can't see them doing much more than Lonsdale/Marion.

They also have the option of being the 10th team in the SFL B grade in 2020 apparently.


There was a nasty incident involving Hackham against your club late last year Dutchy. I am told Hackham's preference is to play in the SFL reserves comp.


Forgot about that, not sure what the outcome was.

They would also need to find some players to have 2 teams in the AdFL, esp with no juniors.

Re: New entries 2020

PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 7:54 am
by marbles
Would prefer cove aldinga and morphett vale than these other applicants