by FOURTH ESTATE » Tue May 15, 2012 11:00 am
by carey » Tue May 15, 2012 11:12 am
by DKL » Tue May 15, 2012 11:15 am
by beef » Tue May 15, 2012 11:16 am
by FOOTY TALK » Tue May 15, 2012 11:24 am
carey wrote::shock:
Well rules are rules.
Could be a huge story tho should Kilburn make the 5 and go well be interesting how the club react to this? How many points were they over? Surly this must of been an oversight? A proud club like Kilburn would'nt let this happen.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 15, 2012 11:36 am
FOOTY TALK wrote:carey wrote::shock:
Well rules are rules.
Could be a huge story tho should Kilburn make the 5 and go well be interesting how the club react to this? How many points were they over? Surly this must of been an oversight? A proud club like Kilburn would'nt let this happen.
SURELY THAT LAST COMMENT IS SARCASM THEY KNEW ALLRIGHT.
by beef » Tue May 15, 2012 12:17 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:FOOTY TALK wrote:carey wrote::shock:
Well rules are rules.
Could be a huge story tho should Kilburn make the 5 and go well be interesting how the club react to this? How many points were they over? Surly this must of been an oversight? A proud club like Kilburn would'nt let this happen.
SURELY THAT LAST COMMENT IS SARCASM THEY KNEW ALLRIGHT.
Oh come on, surely you wouldn't be going into a match knowingly that you are over the points.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 15, 2012 12:19 pm
beef wrote:I dont enter teams in system or anything like that but dont the points come up when entering them in. At least thats what i was told, could be wrong.
by FOOTY TALK » Tue May 15, 2012 12:45 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:FOOTY TALK wrote:carey wrote::shock:
Well rules are rules.
Could be a huge story tho should Kilburn make the 5 and go well be interesting how the club react to this? How many points were they over? Surly this must of been an oversight? A proud club like Kilburn would'nt let this happen.
SURELY THAT LAST COMMENT IS SARCASM THEY KNEW ALLRIGHT.
Oh come on, surely you wouldn't be going into a match knowingly that you are over the points.
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue May 15, 2012 12:47 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue May 15, 2012 1:14 pm
FOOTY TALK wrote:
confirmed all points lost and a fine. and i dont think points will be awarded to other clubs.apparently 6-7 other clubs being looked at aswell.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 15, 2012 1:21 pm
FOOTY TALK wrote:
somebody knew,that i do know.
by Choccies » Tue May 15, 2012 1:31 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:beef wrote:I dont enter teams in system or anything like that but dont the points come up when entering them in. At least thats what i was told, could be wrong.
Yeah, as far as I know they do. They appear on the printout that each team gives to each other aswell. I could only see it as a glitch, but then again, what would I know.
by carey » Tue May 15, 2012 2:10 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:FOOTY TALK wrote:
confirmed all points lost and a fine. and i dont think points will be awarded to other clubs.apparently 6-7 other clubs being looked at aswell.
Who would they be? I heard Districts had an audit. Glenunga had 14 points against us so might be under consideration.
by watchdog » Tue May 15, 2012 2:13 pm
by the joker » Tue May 15, 2012 2:15 pm
by Caramels » Tue May 15, 2012 2:15 pm
by carey » Tue May 15, 2012 2:15 pm
watchdog wrote:I can't comment on the Kilburn saga as I am not involved but IMO (just an unbiased opinion) the amateur league must take some responsibiltiy. How did they allow this to happen for 4 games before errors were found. I can understand maybe 1 or 2 games but 4?? How did the oppostion clubs not pick this up in early rounds? Also I believe the league should make player ratings available online like the GSFL for example which is clear for everyone to see. If Kilburn have broken the rules they must be punsihed in some way but surely this could have been resolved after 1 or 2 rounds
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... sID=199681
With the change over to sporting pulse can you still see previous years players / round by round results etc like you could with the old SAAFL site??
by hotpies » Tue May 15, 2012 2:16 pm
watchdog wrote:I can't comment on the Kilburn saga as I am not involved but IMO (just an unbiased opinion) the amateur league must take some responsibiltiy. How did they allow this to happen for 4 games before errors were found. I can understand maybe 1 or 2 games but 4?? How did the oppostion clubs not pick this up in early rounds? Also I believe the league should make player ratings available online like the GSFL for example which is clear for everyone to see. If Kilburn have broken the rules they must be punsihed in some way but surely this could have been resolved after 1 or 2 rounds
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... sID=199681
With the change over to sporting pulse can you still see previous years players / round by round results etc like you could with the old SAAFL site??
by hotpies » Tue May 15, 2012 2:16 pm
carey wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:FOOTY TALK wrote:
confirmed all points lost and a fine. and i dont think points will be awarded to other clubs.apparently 6-7 other clubs being looked at aswell.
Who would they be? I heard Districts had an audit. Glenunga had 14 points against us so might be under consideration.
I know Mawson Lakes are being looked in to.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |