SA Footy

Broadview
Flinders Park
Gepps Cross
Golden Grove
Mawson Lakes
Mitcham
Prince Alfred OC
Salisbury
SMOSH West Lakes

Kenilworth will be working hard to get a C grade side in 2011.

do henley have an e grade now? where is the smosh d grade?

No Salisbury?

golden groves d grade?

So do we know the teams yet?

Thomilf wrote:So do we know the teams yet?

I can only confirm that North Haven definitely will have a C Grade

Boosh wrote:

Thomilf wrote:So do we know the teams yet?

I can only confirm that North Haven definitely will have a C Grade

Kenilworth will be placing a C grade side.

Does any one know the make up of the C6 comp for 2011?

TEX07 wrote:Does any one know the make up of the C6 comp for 2011?

I'm assuming our D Grade will be in C6, but I would've thought our C Grade would be in C4 and apparently we're not (same situation for other clubs), so any logic the league has used is quickly disappearing?

If anyone has the updated list of C6 teams, PM it to me and I'll update the poll.

Footy Chick wrote:If anyone has the updated list of C6 teams, PM it to me and I'll update the poll.

I've got it, and noticed a pattern. C6 is made up completely of D Grades, and all the C Grades of the 10 clubs have been put in C2, meaning both games will always be at the same ground.

Teams for C2 and C6 at the minute:
Adelaide Uni
Broadview
Flinders Park
Gepps Cross
Golden Grove
Mitcham
Modbury
PAOC
Salisbury
SMOSH West Lakes

So effectively D8 and D8r as rumoured somewhere.

Pag wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:If anyone has the updated list of C6 teams, PM it to me and I'll update the poll.

I've got it, and noticed a pattern. C6 is made up completely of D Grades, and all the C Grades of the 10 clubs have been put in C2, meaning both games will always be at the same ground.

Teams for C2 and C6 at the minute:
Adelaide Uni
Broadview
Flinders Park
Gepps Cross
Golden Grove
Mitcham
Modbury
PAOC
Salisbury
SMOSH West Lakes

I dont mind that to be honest, good for all the clubs concerned really. Does nothing for the triple header thing but is not too bad an idea none the less.

bandar wrote:So effectively D8 and D8r as rumoured somewhere.

Yeah with the ability to play more players, if we had a D8 and Dbr side we could only play the 42 players for both games, this way we can still get the full 50 a game. we still had players miss out last year with 50 so it would be tough to have just the 42.

Was just thinking doing it this way, will there be possible oval availability issues?

Can see some sides possibly getting to play more home games because of clashes? to be honest, I would hate to have to organise this! My head hurts thinking about it, you are never going to please everybody.

TEX07 wrote:Was just thinking doing it this way, will there be possible oval availability issues?

Can see some sides possibly getting to play more home games because of clashes? to be honest, I would hate to have to organise this! My head hurts thinking about it, you are never going to please everybody.

I would think they would twist the draws so no team has any oval clashes, I know ours doesn't clash.

TEX07 wrote:Does any one know the make up of the C6 comp for 2011?

I think C6 will now be:

Golden Grove
Mitcham
Prince Alfred
Broadview
Gepps Cross
SMOSH West Lakes
Flinders Park
Salisbury
Mawson Lakes

With our C grade playing against D grades and games being down at 12.15pm will this hamper our chance to play triple headers?

looks like a good comp i think sides like Flinders pk, smosh, g grove and p a c should all be around top 4 and look the sides to beat but being d grade it will all depend on players being injured in higher grades.time will tell

It will be really good for PAC, SMOSH and GG to renew their rivalry, and maybe FP add some extra competition to the mix? sound like a good year of C6 coming up again