SA Footy

(tentative) Teams:

Adelaide University
Old Ignatians
Ovingham
Payneham NU
Port District
Prince Alfred OC
Rostrevor OC
St Peter's OC
Walkerville

take modbury and athelstone out (div 7) and add wingfield please punk

I'm just going to take out the C grades until they're finalised. too hard...

will be altered when official.

Whatever the sides. After the year they have had I would say that due to the depth of the club and how they play the game. Prince Alfred will have no issue playing in the top 2 division's. Fantastic teams right through

C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

teaoby wrote:C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

and will find it a fair bit harder....
looking forward to having to travel to park 9 from park 10...

finn wrote:

teaoby wrote:C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

and will find it a fair bit harder....
looking forward to having to travel to park 9 from park 10...

Sorry Teaoby, i would take park 10 over 9 anyday. Played my first game back in 5 years at park 10 for the thunder. The patch of grass in both forward lines should be transplanted to park 9 for enmergency surgery. Also the Cranio Facial Unit should come in and operate on the facilities of park 9. Going up the Divs should make it a certainty you fix your rooms up. Surely?

Sorry mate we had this debate already. Coulnt resist. Should be a great contest between you both. Will the Poo shoot play on next year (sorry, Power fan. Couldn't resist that one either)

You are like a broken record Marbles - would better changerooms make you a better player or Portland C's win more games?

Time for the cement porridge.....

is the duck darren thomas going around again jimmy or teaoby?

Jimmy_041 wrote:You are like a broken record Marbles - would better changerooms make you a better player or Portland C's win more games?

Time for the cement porridge.....

Obviously the $$$'s spent on a private education didnt have a class on how to realy read something when it's in jest. It was all tongue in cheek you clown. I couldn't care less about your rooms. An observation on the comparison was all it was pal. Relax a little and ill pass the spoon back to you with the jar half eaten so you can get some too.

Finn. which Uni team is the C2 team? is it the chardonnay's?

teaoby wrote:Finn. which Uni team is the C2 team? is it the chardonnay's?

it was the chardonnays last year - who knows about 2011 but I'd expect it to be a pretty close approximation.
do you know some of the chards?

i know a stack of lads from the blacks in general. will be some entertaining matches in all grades next year

I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

We've lost a lot of the older C Grade players but 4 sides in the GF this year does show depth

LMA wrote:I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

I'll stick my neck out here and say our 2010 team would have beaten our 2009 team by 10 goals every week.

I can see how many 2009 B Grade played in C's and 2009 C Grade in D's

finn wrote:

LMA wrote:I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

Having played C6, C4 and C1 personally I haven't found that much difference in standard in the years I played in those divs, however that's only a point of view from the position I play.

I thought you coached the C6 side a few years back Finn?

LMA wrote:

finn wrote:

LMA wrote:I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

Having played C6, C4 and C1 personally I haven't found that much difference in standard in the years I played in those divs, however that's only a point of view from the position I play.

I thought you coached the C6 side a few years back Finn?

nope, i wobbled around in a forward pocket then coached the afternoon game.
probably the bottom ten players are consistently better in the higher c grades.