SA Footy

In the "Other Matters" section for this one;

Todays Footy News has a section on Close Encounters (won by a kick) and lists a Div 1 result for Gepps V TTG as 2 point victory to TTG.

Now when that game finished, and I was there, I could have sworn the scoreboard read Gepps Cross had won by around 50+ points. I stand corrected. If I'm losing my 'marbles' or early onset of dymentia is occuring then I'll have to deal with that, but please, if you are going to put things in print, get the facts CORRECT.
This gives many people a very valid reason to have a shot at the publication for incompetance.

Looks like they forgot the 'R' after D1

BigDaddy wrote:Looks like they forgot the 'R' after D1

That's why good typesetters and "proof readers" are employed I think.

you mean NOT employed?

Footy Chick wrote:you mean NOT employed?

But of course, how silly of me!

aceman wrote:In the "Other Matters" section for this one;

Todays Footy News has a section on Close Encounters (won by a kick) and lists a Div 1 result for Gepps V TTG as 2 point victory to TTG.

Now when that game finished, and I was there, I could have sworn the scoreboard read Gepps Cross had won by around 50+ points. I stand corrected. If I'm losing my 'marbles' or early onset of dymentia is occuring then I'll have to deal with that, but please, if you are going to put things in print, get the facts CORRECT.
This gives many people a very valid reason to have a shot at the publication for incompetance.

Incompetance at the bunker - come on Ace surely you must be joking of course