by Blues08 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:49 pm
by BigDaddy » Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:10 pm
by footynut » Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:17 pm
by Shaz » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:31 pm
footynut wrote:Hey Shaz I know you are only joking about Broadies because you couldnt be that silly. Women and children are always welcome in our club and we are known widely as a good family club. Come in sometime and bring your partner (if you have one) and Im sure youll agree. We are playing Scotch in a trial this week and you are most welcome.
by The Big Shrek » Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:56 pm
by Bold Strategy » Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:40 pm
Shaz wrote:footynut wrote:Hey Shaz I know you are only joking about Broadies because you couldnt be that silly. Women and children are always welcome in our club and we are known widely as a good family club. Come in sometime and bring your partner (if you have one) and Im sure youll agree. We are playing Scotch in a trial this week and you are most welcome.
As long as your happy with the club that's the main thing!
I'm just going on the feelings of a couple of good mates who played out there for a couple of years and without going into any details (as I'm not trying to bad mouth the club) did not enjoy it. Things may have changed since then, and lots of people must love it because as people have said they have been successful.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:27 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Isn't it interesting that Seaton are losing all of their players. Wasn't there a rumour about an incident at their presentation night last year which could explain this? If my memory serves me correctly, Hodges asked all of the then current players to commit to the following season. The accounts of what happen diverge here. One version was that no one would commit, the other stated that everyone did.
Which story is true? Did Hodges lack the support of the players or was the playing group a bunch of liars and Seaton is better off without them anyway.
by Rotter » Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:40 am
No Mercy: I have always had a great deal of respect for your comments but on this occasions I'll disagree. My father and I were there as guests of the SAAFL and subsequently the Seaton club and it was the most embarrassing situation I have seen for a long time. I was sitting near Big Al and he was embarassed at the turn of events. Until this point I had no idea you and Seaton were related beyond a passive interest but we left there that night thinking the Rams were in a situation that they would not recover from at least in the short term. For what it's worth, the old man and I were thinking on the way home that the Seaton Football Club would be far better off paying extra money for a recognised identity for a coach to put the club in a positive situation.NO-MERCY wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Isn't it interesting that Seaton are losing all of their players. Wasn't there a rumour about an incident at their presentation night last year which could explain this? If my memory serves me correctly, Hodges asked all of the then current players to commit to the following season. The accounts of what happen diverge here. One version was that no one would commit, the other stated that everyone did.
Which story is true? Did Hodges lack the support of the players or was the playing group a bunch of liars and Seaton is better off without them anyway.
Well Big Shrek i don't know what your really trying to salvage here or wheather your just sh!t stiring, sounds like the latter.
I'll tell you one thing, when Hodges asked who's commiting to next year alot of blokes were shocked with his direct approach, something that all players wern't prepared for.
When he asked the 2nd time they realised where he was coming from, they all got up & walked up to the stage & recieved their 2008 schedule to commit.
Whatever versions you are hearing champ i suggest you do your homework & find the real version from the right sources before you get on here & flap your gums.
If Hodges was the problem, wouldn't they all still be there? If anything alot of these blokes left because he left.
by The Big Shrek » Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:23 am
NO-MERCY wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Isn't it interesting that Seaton are losing all of their players. Wasn't there a rumour about an incident at their presentation night last year which could explain this? If my memory serves me correctly, Hodges asked all of the then current players to commit to the following season. The accounts of what happen diverge here. One version was that no one would commit, the other stated that everyone did.
Which story is true? Did Hodges lack the support of the players or was the playing group a bunch of liars and Seaton is better off without them anyway.
Well Big Shrek i don't know what your really trying to salvage here or wheather your just sh!t stiring, sounds like the latter.
I'll tell you one thing, when Hodges asked who's commiting to next year alot of blokes were shocked with his direct approach, something that all players wern't prepared for.
When he asked the 2nd time they realised where he was coming from, they all got up & walked up to the stage & recieved their 2008 schedule to commit.
Whatever versions you are hearing champ i suggest you do your homework & find the real version from the right sources before you get on here & flap your gums.
If Hodges was the problem, wouldn't they all still be there? If anything alot of these blokes left because he left.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:40 am
by The Big Shrek » Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:49 am
by Rotter » Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:53 am
Firstly, I didn't drink that night and secondly, don't flatter yourself, I would never have been that needy for a game of footy that I'd pull the boots on with those light weights. Thirdly "perfect order", you really are delusional. Finally, I couldn't give a rats toss bag about Scott Hodges let alone be a critic of his and if you read my post I didn't criticize him at all. < edited>NO-MERCY wrote:you sound like a player that didn't get his own way in the team so you want to blame others for your failures.
Its funny Rotter i was there as well & i didn't see the events your describing, maybe you had too much to drink & had a bad nightmare or your just a critic of his.
The club was in perfect order
by NO-MERCY » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:00 am
Rotter wrote:Firstly, I didn't drink that night and secondly, don't flatter yourself, I would never have been that needy for a game of footy that I'd pull the boots on with those light weights. Thirdly "perfect order", you really are delusional. Finally, I couldn't give a rats toss bag about Scott Hodges let alone be a critic of his and if you read my post I didn't criticize him at all, Twit. Maybe you should be seeking the same counselling Scott is.NO-MERCY wrote:you sound like a player that didn't get his own way in the team so you want to blame others for your failures.
Its funny Rotter i was there as well & i didn't see the events your describing, maybe you had too much to drink & had a bad nightmare or your just a critic of his.
The club was in perfect order
by The Big Shrek » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:02 am
by Rotter » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:16 am
Man you really are paranoid, I didn't bring him up, you did.NO-MERCY wrote:Rotter wrote:Firstly, I didn't drink that night and secondly, don't flatter yourself, I would never have been that needy for a game of footy that I'd pull the boots on with those light weights. Thirdly "perfect order", you really are delusional. Finally, I couldn't give a rats toss bag about Scott Hodges let alone be a critic of his and if you read my post I didn't criticize him at all, Twit. Maybe you should be seeking the same counselling Scott is.NO-MERCY wrote:you sound like a player that didn't get his own way in the team so you want to blame others for your failures.
Its funny Rotter i was there as well & i didn't see the events your describing, maybe you had too much to drink & had a bad nightmare or your just a critic of his.
The club was in perfect order
If you didn't give a rats toss bag, why bring him up in the first place, TWIT.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:29 am
The Big Shrek wrote:I don't mean they were embarassed into committing because of Hodges situation, they were embarassed because of the pressure of being asked infront of the entire club.
A club is bigger than one person, so why is it acceptable for players to leave en masse just because a coach leaves, regardless of how good he is?
by BUZZ » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:46 am
by BUZZ » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:50 am
Rotter wrote:No Mercy: I have always had a great deal of respect for your comments but on this occasions I'll disagree. My father and I were there as guests of the SAAFL and subsequently the Seaton club and it was the most embarrassing situation I have seen for a long time. I was sitting near Big Al and he was embarassed at the turn of events. Until this point I had no idea you and Seaton were related beyond a passive interest but we left there that night thinking the Rams were in a situation that they would not recover from at least in the short term. For what it's worth, the old man and I were thinking on the way home that the Seaton Football Club would be far better off paying extra money for a recognised identity for a coach to put the club in a positive situation.NO-MERCY wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Isn't it interesting that Seaton are losing all of their players. Wasn't there a rumour about an incident at their presentation night last year which could explain this? If my memory serves me correctly, Hodges asked all of the then current players to commit to the following season. The accounts of what happen diverge here. One version was that no one would commit, the other stated that everyone did.
Which story is true? Did Hodges lack the support of the players or was the playing group a bunch of liars and Seaton is better off without them anyway.
Well Big Shrek i don't know what your really trying to salvage here or wheather your just sh!t stiring, sounds like the latter.
I'll tell you one thing, when Hodges asked who's commiting to next year alot of blokes were shocked with his direct approach, something that all players wern't prepared for.
When he asked the 2nd time they realised where he was coming from, they all got up & walked up to the stage & recieved their 2008 schedule to commit.
Whatever versions you are hearing champ i suggest you do your homework & find the real version from the right sources before you get on here & flap your gums.
If Hodges was the problem, wouldn't they all still be there? If anything alot of these blokes left because he left.
by Rotter » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:58 am
You've answered your own question, you were unaware.BUZZ wrote:Rotter wrote:No Mercy: I have always had a great deal of respect for your comments but on this occasions I'll disagree. My father and I were there as guests of the SAAFL and subsequently the Seaton club and it was the most embarrassing situation I have seen for a long time. I was sitting near Big Al and he was embarassed at the turn of events. Until this point I had no idea you and Seaton were related beyond a passive interest but we left there that night thinking the Rams were in a situation that they would not recover from at least in the short term. For what it's worth, the old man and I were thinking on the way home that the Seaton Football Club would be far better off paying extra money for a recognised identity for a coach to put the club in a positive situation.NO-MERCY wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Isn't it interesting that Seaton are losing all of their players. Wasn't there a rumour about an incident at their presentation night last year which could explain this? If my memory serves me correctly, Hodges asked all of the then current players to commit to the following season. The accounts of what happen diverge here. One version was that no one would commit, the other stated that everyone did.
Which story is true? Did Hodges lack the support of the players or was the playing group a bunch of liars and Seaton is better off without them anyway.
Well Big Shrek i don't know what your really trying to salvage here or wheather your just sh!t stiring, sounds like the latter.
I'll tell you one thing, when Hodges asked who's commiting to next year alot of blokes were shocked with his direct approach, something that all players wern't prepared for.
When he asked the 2nd time they realised where he was coming from, they all got up & walked up to the stage & recieved their 2008 schedule to commit.
Whatever versions you are hearing champ i suggest you do your homework & find the real version from the right sources before you get on here & flap your gums.
If Hodges was the problem, wouldn't they all still be there? If anything alot of these blokes left because he left.
We were on the same table then Rotter and i was unaware that we had SAAFL guests?
by The Big Shrek » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:09 am
BUZZ wrote:What a load of crap Rotter and Shrek, you guys would have no idea on whats happening or happened at Seaton.
Lay off the Hodges not coaching at Seaton 'drama'.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |