by morell » Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:52 am
by Q. » Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:12 pm
by morell » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:09 am
by Feenix » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:49 am
by jo172 » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:54 am
Feenix wrote:Apparenlty North Pines cant afford the $2,000 fine they were given
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger ... 7105631495
by Cohiba » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:21 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:17 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Cohiba » Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:47 pm
Footy Chick wrote:and then there are clubs who seem to hide their controversies well....
by carey » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:44 pm
by morell » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:45 pm
Cohiba wrote:It seems that barely a handful of Clubs are causing the bulk of the controversy within the SAAFL over the last couple of seasons.
Given the varied viewpoints on this (and other) forum(s) suggests if member Clubs had to vote for either the redemption or the de-registration of these estranged Clubs to determine if its in the best interests of League .......the result could be interesting....
by Cohiba » Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:09 pm
morell wrote:Cohiba wrote:It seems that barely a handful of Clubs are causing the bulk of the controversy within the SAAFL over the last couple of seasons.
Given the varied viewpoints on this (and other) forum(s) suggests if member Clubs had to vote for either the redemption or the de-registration of these estranged Clubs to determine if its in the best interests of League .......the result could be interesting....
Oh yeah, great idea, lets turn the SAAFL into a toffee nosed version of a Big Brother esque popularity contest.
Hopefully the SAAFL continue to deal with facts, data and information, not anecdotal impressions, perceptions and rumours.
by Q. » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:06 pm
Feenix wrote:Apparenlty North Pines cant afford the $2,000 fine they were given
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger ... 7105631495
by Q. » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:10 pm
morell wrote:Well done Q! Was 9% about what you expected? Do you have any performance targets or the like in place?
... and as we know, any preseason work before Christmas is a complete waste of time. It's in morell's myths!
by morell » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:12 pm
Not at all, I am rebuking the concept of clubs voting on other clubs survival or otherwise. Sorry but it's preposterous.Cohiba wrote:morell wrote:Cohiba wrote:It seems that barely a handful of Clubs are causing the bulk of the controversy within the SAAFL over the last couple of seasons.
Given the varied viewpoints on this (and other) forum(s) suggests if member Clubs had to vote for either the redemption or the de-registration of these estranged Clubs to determine if its in the best interests of League .......the result could be interesting....
Oh yeah, great idea, lets turn the SAAFL into a toffee nosed version of a Big Brother esque popularity contest.
Hopefully the SAAFL continue to deal with facts, data and information, not anecdotal impressions, perceptions and rumours.
I did say...."it seems" M............unless your suggesting its all been a major conspiracy by our elected officials and the events of recent seasons has all been contrived and is without any substance at all........It's just an observation to which you've said plenty.....
by Cohiba » Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:01 pm
morell wrote:Not at all, I am rebuking the concept of clubs voting on other clubs survival or otherwise. Sorry but it's preposterous.Cohiba wrote:morell wrote:Cohiba wrote:It seems that barely a handful of Clubs are causing the bulk of the controversy within the SAAFL over the last couple of seasons.
Given the varied viewpoints on this (and other) forum(s) suggests if member Clubs had to vote for either the redemption or the de-registration of these estranged Clubs to determine if its in the best interests of League .......the result could be interesting....
Oh yeah, great idea, lets turn the SAAFL into a toffee nosed version of a Big Brother esque popularity contest.
Hopefully the SAAFL continue to deal with facts, data and information, not anecdotal impressions, perceptions and rumours.
I did say...."it seems" M............unless your suggesting its all been a major conspiracy by our elected officials and the events of recent seasons has all been contrived and is without any substance at all........It's just an observation to which you've said plenty.....
by adr107 » Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:45 am
carey wrote:Houghton picking up a few Fitzroy crickets for the upcoming football season I hear.....
by Q. » Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:50 am
adr107 wrote:carey wrote:Houghton picking up a few Fitzroy crickets for the upcoming football season I hear.....
Just the one and he will have to throw the shin pads away if he wants to make an impact before 'Roling' into the township
by morell » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:26 am
Furr enuff.Cohiba wrote:I don't disagree.....but nowhere did I advocate that such a vote should be taken!!!!...........In context it was purely a hypothetical.....given the amount of diverse opinion expressed on this forum last season about the turmoil within a small number of Clubs whose actions impacted directly or indirectly on others than just themselves. Citing the North Pines cricketers as a recent example if indeed it is the case......
by carey » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:44 am
Q. wrote:adr107 wrote:carey wrote:Houghton picking up a few Fitzroy crickets for the upcoming football season I hear.....
Just the one and he will have to throw the shin pads away if he wants to make an impact before 'Roling' into the township
I was wondering what the hell carey was on about???
by The Informer » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:57 am
adr107 wrote:carey wrote:Houghton picking up a few Fitzroy crickets for the upcoming football season I hear.....
Just the one and he will have to throw the shin pads away if he wants to make an impact before 'Roling' into the township
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |