by carey » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:32 pm
by hawkseye » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:53 pm
zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
by woodublieve12 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:07 pm
demonseye wrote:zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
To have 2 good ruckman?
by catchisthecry » Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:40 pm
by EddieV » Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:21 pm
catchisthecry wrote:I'm just amazed the number of players apparently getting paid at Div 5 level. I come from a club who pays no-one and am hoping we will be able to be competitive this year..
Obviously $$ makes recruiting easier. But like I said, surprised at the numbers thrown around.
by zedman » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:06 pm
demonseye wrote:zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
To have 2 good ruckman?
by hawkseye » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:09 pm
zedman wrote:demonseye wrote:zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
To have 2 good ruckman?
$250 for one to ruck 20-30 minutes a game?
thats what i mean..
by unknown source » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:11 pm
catchisthecry wrote:I'm just amazed the number of players apparently getting paid at Div 5 level. I come from a club who pays no-one and am hoping we will be able to be competitive this year..
Obviously $$ makes recruiting easier. But like I said, surprised at the numbers thrown around.
by catchisthecry » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:40 pm
by catchisthecry » Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:41 pm
by EddieV » Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:27 am
catchisthecry wrote:Not having a crack at teams that do by the way. Just surprised by amounts and numbers.. But like Eddie V said, might be best off ignoring the talk
by Groover » Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:09 am
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:30 am
Groover wrote:Does it matter if players get paid? Doesnt really effect how people go out and play the game. Anyone playing footy for $0 can be just as valuable to a team then someone getting paid $0>. At the end of the day if clubs are happy to pay some money out to people they want to represent their club then good on em'.
Money still doesnt win you games of footy!
by mighty hounds » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:41 am
unknown source wrote:catchisthecry wrote:I'm just amazed the number of players apparently getting paid at Div 5 level. I come from a club who pays no-one and am hoping we will be able to be competitive this year..
Obviously $$ makes recruiting easier. But like I said, surprised at the numbers thrown around.
because college teams don't pay
by daysofourlives » Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:22 am
demonseye wrote:zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
To have 2 good ruckman?
by Demon Juke » Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:59 am
Groover wrote:Does it matter if players get paid? Doesnt really effect how people go out and play the game. Anyone playing footy for $0 can be just as valuable to a team then someone getting paid $0>. At the end of the day if clubs are happy to pay some money out to people they want to represent their club then good on em'.
Money still doesnt win you games of footy!
by gothebombers » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:22 am
by unknown source » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:45 am
catchisthecry wrote:I'm sure there are college teams that do pay unknown source. Adelaide Lutheran do not.
by unknown source » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:46 am
by zedman » Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:04 pm
daysofourlives wrote:demonseye wrote:zedman wrote:why would they do that when james is the best ruckman in the division?
To have 2 good ruckman?
Isnt James training at centrals, maybe thats why they are looking for another ruckman
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |