SA Footy

Love a good club bashing and some controversy - D4 thread really firing strong this week!

Keep up the good work peeps

TIRED TIGER wrote:

Pag wrote:

scottroo wrote:100% true

Morphie Parks now second
Ep third

Gepps Cross given the win and jump to 5th with 14pts

This puts a fair dent in the rest of the comp fighting for 5th. Gepps kissed on the dick in the biggest way.

Seeming they lost by 3 points and Harder kicked a goal I'd say justice prevails.he shouldn't have been able to play regardless.

Who's to say his replacement wouldn't have kicked one, or three, or five?

If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle.

It was on the SAAFL website that his permit was approved, if we knew anything like this was going to come from it we definitely wouldn't have played him.. in saying that though, if the SAAFL were only going to strip us of a win and 2 points which puts us back in a hard spot, they should never have approved it in the first place? It's ridiculous how in this day and age, something like this can still happen! I'm still having trouble understanding how we were in the wrong or deserve to get punished it any way? We put in a permit, it was approved, we won a game of footy.. but what puzzles me most is how for some unknown reason, gepps cross suddenly get awarded them points in a game they lost? Lol exactly like pag said, the player that would have filled his spot could have kicked 5 for all we know?

All saafl clearances get auto-approved.

Permits need to be applied in writing to the league.

Alright, so if that's the case which was unknown to us obviously and as much as it's pretty ridiculous to autonapprove permits if your only gonna strip teams of points at a later date, the question still stands as to why gepps cross get rewarded points in a losing game? Lol

#bleedredandblue wrote:Alright, so if that's the case which was unknown to us obviously and as much as it's pretty ridiculous to autonapprove permits if your only gonna strip teams of points at a later date, the question still stands as to why gepps cross get rewarded points in a losing game? Lol

I've come in a bit late here so excuse me if I'm telling you shit you all already know = but there are certain rules around applying permits and it's to the best of my knowledge that Whop didn't come under any of those rules, or broke the rules on one end by making himself unavailable for a rep side to go and play for a club that he had no prior alignment with.

Or something like that anyway

#bleedredandblue wrote:Alright, so if that's the case which was unknown to us obviously and as much as it's pretty ridiculous to autonapprove permits if your only gonna strip teams of points at a later date, the question still stands as to why gepps cross get rewarded points in a losing game? Lol

Same way as if any ineligible player plays an Adelaide Footy League game it's a forefit?

Pag wrote:Seeming they lost by 3 points and Harder kicked a goal I'd say justice prevails.he shouldn't have been able to play regardless.
Who's to say his replacement wouldn't have kicked one, or three, or five?

If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle.

Would you have the same rationale though if Edwardstown played a Division 1 or 2 player or against Salisbury this week because Division 1 and 2 have the bye and a permit was somehow allowed through? (pure hypothetical here)

Footy Chick wrote:

Pag wrote:Seeming they lost by 3 points and Harder kicked a goal I'd say justice prevails.he shouldn't have been able to play regardless.
Who's to say his replacement wouldn't have kicked one, or three, or five?

If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle.

Would you have the same rationale though if Edwardstown played a Division 1 or 2 player or against Salisbury this week because Division 1 and 2 have the bye and a permit was somehow allowed through? (pure hypothetical here)

What if the Adelaide Crows take the field in Edwardstown's place on permits and beat Salisbury by 50 goals?

Who's to say the replacement Edwardstown players wouldn't also beat Salisbury by 50 goals?

Got to draw the line somewhere, adherence to the rules would seem to be the appropriate place to start.

Which leads to another question:

Could a Div 7 side beat a D1R side?

Pag wrote:

TIRED TIGER wrote:

Pag wrote:

scottroo wrote:100% true

Morphie Parks now second
Ep third

Gepps Cross given the win and jump to 5th with 14pts

This puts a fair dent in the rest of the comp fighting for 5th. Gepps kissed on the dick in the biggest way.

Seeming they lost by 3 points and Harder kicked a goal I'd say justice prevails.he shouldn't have been able to play regardless.

Who's to say his replacement wouldn't have kicked one, or three, or five?

If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle.

well put it this way Pag, Harder was available for one game to a club he's never played for.Someone made way for him to come in so that was probably the bloke who would've kicked 3 or 5 goals lol. They played with matches and got burnt.
To be quite honest I reckon our league shouldn't let anyone chasing money in country leagues have a permit full stop.

TIRED TIGER wrote:

Pag wrote:

TIRED TIGER wrote:Seeming they lost by 3 points and Harder kicked a goal I'd say justice prevails.he shouldn't have been able to play regardless.

Who's to say his replacement wouldn't have kicked one, or three, or five?

If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle.

well put it this way Pag, Harder was available for one game to a club he's never played for.Someone made way for him to come in so that was probably the bloke who would've kicked 3 or 5 goals lol. They played with matches and got burnt.
To be quite honest I reckon our league shouldn't let anyone chasing money in country leagues have a permit full stop.

Completely agree with this last statement.

I still maintain Gepps have been kissed on the dick, perhaps through no fault of their own, they just happened to be the club drawn against EP on that particular day.

.

Zartan looking at your postings over night I'd say you've lost a bit of credibility with a lot of clubs

Not kidding there. Over the years Ingle Farm haven't had the best reputation and things like that also can in do some of the work the club has done. Calling other clubs full of volunteers and hard working people shit or ordinary clubs is completely disrespectful on a public forum.

Oh well is what it is, shouldn't reflect on the IFFC though - 3wks time my involvement with footy and IF will cease

Hearing Fitzroy a-grade coach has walked, frustrated at certain players not wanting to play a's

Q. wrote:Hearing Fitzroy a-grade coach has walked, frustrated at certain players not wanting to play a's

I've heard he's stepped down with immediate effect too, Arch will hopefully fill us in, he's taking the reigns for the last few weeks

Zartan wrote:Oh well is what it is, shouldn't reflect on the IFFC though - 3wks time my involvement with footy and IF will cease

At that point Dutchy and I are coming over with a carton of red tins and an I pad so you can really go to town and tell us what you think

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:Hearing Fitzroy a-grade coach has walked, frustrated at certain players not wanting to play a's

I've heard he's stepped down with immediate effect too, Arch will hopefully fill us in, he's taking the reigns for the last few weeks

Err, not sure why I posted this in D4