by amateur football » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:07 pm
by hawkseye » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:35 pm
amateur football wrote:Andy me boy, just telling you what Kilburn people, Kilburn Coaching Staff, Kilburn Supporters and Kilburn Players are all saying behind you back. They reckon you are a good guy and passionate about your club, they reckon you would do anything to help out when it comes to doing some work around the place.
But
They reckon you have limited ability and hopefully shut up, as you are placing a huge burden upon all of the people mentioned above, let alone the Coach, who is trying to keep everything under wraps and without any great fan fare. Ocker just wants to ease into the season without having anyone putting pressure on all of the above - for obvious reasons.
Now Andy that is not being rude, but constructive criticisim from the people at Kilburn. They just want you to shut up. They hoped to sneak under the radar, but gee with Andy around how the hell could they do that.
Sadly, you are the only one who cant see it. Newman, Buzz, No Mercy, Me and the whole Myriad of people on here are not having a personal shot at you, just learn some discretion and learn when its best to open your mouth. This year you will have lots of time to open it from what I hear. Your game starts at 12.15am and then you can watch the A Grade and cheer them on.
Kilburn people are just wanting you to put a sock in it so they have some chance of surprise. Im backing Flinders Park personally, as unlike you no-one has said nothing, they have picked up heeps and have a fantastic coach in Sean Jackson. Jackson is surely better than half of the field going around in A1 (in the coaching stakes), and should be still at that level
by bickle » Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:38 am
by rogernumber10 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:59 am
by Punk Rooster » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:01 am
rogernumber10 wrote:Is there any chance Old Ignatians can have our name spelt correctly in the options? Or is that a really, really subtle sledge?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by rogernumber10 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:05 am
by roosters1 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:25 am
by schimma » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:32 am
roosters1 wrote:Who,s coaching Kilburn?
Have they any new players?
by NO-MERCY » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:42 am
roosters1 wrote:Who,s coaching Kilburn?
Have they any new players?
by barbs » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:52 am
by Andy #24 » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:18 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:57 am
burglar wrote:whats going on at Salisbury West, have not heard a great deal.
Creeks still there?
by FootyMad » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:02 am
by lovetotalkfooty » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:47 am
by NO-MERCY » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:49 am
Falcon Chick wrote:burglar wrote:whats going on at Salisbury West, have not heard a great deal.
Creeks still there?
I would doubt very much they are. Under this new system, the SAAFL will not register any player that has been suspended for 12 weeks or more since 2005.
That counts out all 3 of them...
The club can appeal against this apparently and pay a "bond" (like a bail amount) for each player, which is lost if the player is suspended again.
by zedman » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:50 am
Falcon Chick wrote:burglar wrote:whats going on at Salisbury West, have not heard a great deal.
Creeks still there?
I would doubt very much they are. Under this new system, the SAAFL will not register any player that has been suspended for 12 weeks or more since 2005.
That counts out all 3 of them...
The club can appeal against this apparently and pay a "bond" (like a bail amount) for each player, which is lost if the player is suspended again.
by FootyMad » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:57 am
zedman wrote:Falcon Chick wrote:burglar wrote:whats going on at Salisbury West, have not heard a great deal.
Creeks still there?
I would doubt very much they are. Under this new system, the SAAFL will not register any player that has been suspended for 12 weeks or more since 2005.
That counts out all 3 of them...
The club can appeal against this apparently and pay a "bond" (like a bail amount) for each player, which is lost if the player is suspended again.
all 3 of them..wtf?
I think the term would be 'up shit creek'
they all got suspended?
must be fun at xmas with those boys
by Footy Chick » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:28 am
zedman wrote:Falcon Chick wrote:burglar wrote:whats going on at Salisbury West, have not heard a great deal.
Creeks still there?
I would doubt very much they are. Under this new system, the SAAFL will not register any player that has been suspended for 12 weeks or more since 2005.
That counts out all 3 of them...
The club can appeal against this apparently and pay a "bond" (like a bail amount) for each player, which is lost if the player is suspended again.
all 3 of them..wtf?
they all got suspended?
must be fun at xmas with those boys
by Pag » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:37 am
roosters1 wrote:Any news on Salisbury
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |