by locky801 » Wed May 30, 2012 7:15 pm
by Tony Clifton » Wed May 30, 2012 7:33 pm
heater31 wrote:Heard a Hamstring or Adductor muscle pop yesterday (possibly even off the bone) at the Pulteney/Unley game wasn't the only one to hear it either
by heater31 » Wed May 30, 2012 7:34 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:heater31 wrote:Heard a Hamstring or Adductor muscle pop yesterday (possibly even off the bone) at the Pulteney/Unley game wasn't the only one to hear it either
Player from which team?
by Tony Clifton » Wed May 30, 2012 7:38 pm
heater31 wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:heater31 wrote:Heard a Hamstring or Adductor muscle pop yesterday (possibly even off the bone) at the Pulteney/Unley game wasn't the only one to hear it either
Player from which team?
Pulteney mate, I take it that you were elsewhere......
by valleys07 » Wed May 30, 2012 7:41 pm
by Dols » Wed May 30, 2012 7:50 pm
by NO-MERCY » Wed May 30, 2012 7:50 pm
locky801 wrote:Darren Mitchell (Broadview) out for a few weeks with an ankle
by heater31 » Wed May 30, 2012 8:01 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:heater31 wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:heater31 wrote:Heard a Hamstring or Adductor muscle pop yesterday (possibly even off the bone) at the Pulteney/Unley game wasn't the only one to hear it either
Player from which team?
Pulteney mate, I take it that you were elsewhere......
Bugger. Who was it?
by Demon Juke » Wed May 30, 2012 8:10 pm
HH3 wrote:Last night at training I took notice of how far the boundry line is from the concrete. Its about 4m, then about 2.5m of concrete before the window. The SAAFL rules only say there has to be 3m between the boundry line and the fence/line for spectators to stand behind. So technically the conditions are within the guidelines stipulated by the SAAFL.
Also, In 7 seasons of senior footy at NH, Ive never seen anyone go that far past the boundry line. It was just an uncommon accident. And I dont think its good for third parties to be putting the idea of lawsuits (even if you dont agree with going down that path) into peoples heads. You give the wrong type of person that idea, and it could mean massive troubles to a club that has really done nothing wrong.
by The Big T » Thu May 31, 2012 12:36 am
valleys07 wrote:Dols- not sure whether your trolling or just plain stupid.
Given the character of Paul, I feel the need to stick up for the kid as he has stepped up to senior footy this season and earned the respect of the playing group by playing the ball at all costs and playing the game with integrity and sportsmanship, NOT thuggery. Pauls accident was merely one of the most unfortunate of incidents you are likely to see on a footy field.
I will repeat it was not the fault of the north haven footy club and DEFINATELY not an act of thuggery gone wrong. Stop trying to paint a picture of a kid who deserves nothing but sympathy for some bad luck.
by locky801 » Thu May 31, 2012 6:58 am
NO-MERCY wrote:locky801 wrote:Darren Mitchell (Broadview) out for a few weeks with an ankle
Is that a lack of training?
by Mr Beefy » Thu May 31, 2012 7:09 am
whufc wrote:Jetters wrote:-The football league (if official has no quals or experience, how can they make an official assesment on a grounds safety etc etc
The question he asked which i couldnt answer is the ground marshalls who sign off on the ground. What qualifications and profesional experience do they have to be making player safety evaluations on behalf of 21 footballers?
This path is surely not in the interests of football clubs. Do we want more rules and regulations placed on volunteers, they are hard enough to find as it is.
No one wants more rules or regs but do you think if someone does a serious injury or for example if that bloke had slipped on the concrete hit his head and died (far fetched yes unrealistic no) do you no think a decent lawyer will look and try and point the finger at the club marschall who works as a waiter with no expertise in player safety signing off on the safety of 40odd footballers.
All im saying is dont leave yourself 1% at risk. Thats all it will take for your club to be forced to go to court and from that point your club may go broke just trying to defend themselves.
by Boosh » Thu May 31, 2012 9:19 am
valleys07 wrote:Dols- not sure whether your trolling or just plain stupid.
Given the character of Paul, I feel the need to stick up for the kid as he has stepped up to senior footy this season and earned the respect of the playing group by playing the ball at all costs and playing the game with integrity and sportsmanship, NOT thuggery. Pauls accident was merely one of the most unfortunate of incidents you are likely to see on a footy field.
I will repeat it was not the fault of the north haven footy club and DEFINATELY not an act of thuggery gone wrong. Stop trying to paint a picture of a kid who deserves nothing but sympathy for some bad luck.
by Boosh » Thu May 31, 2012 9:25 am
Demon Juke wrote:HH3 wrote:Last night at training I took notice of how far the boundry line is from the concrete. Its about 4m, then about 2.5m of concrete before the window. The SAAFL rules only say there has to be 3m between the boundry line and the fence/line for spectators to stand behind. So technically the conditions are within the guidelines stipulated by the SAAFL.
Also, In 7 seasons of senior footy at NH, Ive never seen anyone go that far past the boundry line. It was just an uncommon accident. And I dont think its good for third parties to be putting the idea of lawsuits (even if you dont agree with going down that path) into peoples heads. You give the wrong type of person that idea, and it could mean massive troubles to a club that has really done nothing wrong.
Not saying it was your club that caused it but you say no one has done it in 7 seasons, but two people have done it 1 game. Lucky for North Haven bloke didn't end up the same way as the Hope Valley kid. I no you are saying it is 4 metres but you have heaps of room to increase it by a couple of metres so no one will have the chance to injury themself.
by Footy Chick » Thu May 31, 2012 10:17 am
by valleys07 » Thu May 31, 2012 10:41 am
Boosh wrote:valleys07 wrote:Dols- not sure whether your trolling or just plain stupid.
Given the character of Paul, I feel the need to stick up for the kid as he has stepped up to senior footy this season and earned the respect of the playing group by playing the ball at all costs and playing the game with integrity and sportsmanship, NOT thuggery. Pauls accident was merely one of the most unfortunate of incidents you are likely to see on a footy field.
I will repeat it was not the fault of the north haven footy club and DEFINATELY not an act of thuggery gone wrong. Stop trying to paint a picture of a kid who deserves nothing but sympathy for some bad luck.
It is very unfortunate and this sort of thing does happen from time to time, hopefully being so young he recovers quickly and is back playing without any trouble from the ankle.
by Boosh » Thu May 31, 2012 2:39 pm
valleys07 wrote:Boosh wrote:valleys07 wrote:Dols- not sure whether your trolling or just plain stupid.
Given the character of Paul, I feel the need to stick up for the kid as he has stepped up to senior footy this season and earned the respect of the playing group by playing the ball at all costs and playing the game with integrity and sportsmanship, NOT thuggery. Pauls accident was merely one of the most unfortunate of incidents you are likely to see on a footy field.
I will repeat it was not the fault of the north haven footy club and DEFINATELY not an act of thuggery gone wrong. Stop trying to paint a picture of a kid who deserves nothing but sympathy for some bad luck.
It is very unfortunate and this sort of thing does happen from time to time, hopefully being so young he recovers quickly and is back playing without any trouble from the ankle.
Cheers Boosh. How is your elbow looking, you right to play this week?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |