by S Demon » Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:21 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:00 pm
cossi11 wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:After playing at Hope Valleys oval on the weekend with a turf pitch I would much rather play on an oval with a sand covered cricket pitch.
Agree! i dont think i have ever seen an oval in worse condition than that! to kick 14goals on that was a great effort...
by custardarm » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:02 pm
cossi11 wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:After playing at Hope Valleys oval on the weekend with a turf pitch I would much rather play on an oval with a sand covered cricket pitch.
Agree! i dont think i have ever seen an oval in worse condition than that! to kick 14goals on that was a great effort...
by TIRED TIGER » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:16 pm
by custardarm » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:30 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad. 22 goals scored tells me it wasnt as bad as everyone suggests, a 10 goal game would probably have been more likely if it was so muddy. perhaps some of you guys should play at etihad (under the roof) so you dont get muddyuse to play on ovals like that most winters in the old days
by The Bartman » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:46 pm
cossi11 wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:After playing at Hope Valleys oval on the weekend with a turf pitch I would much rather play on an oval with a sand covered cricket pitch.
Agree! i dont think i have ever seen an oval in worse condition than that! to kick 14goals on that was a great effort...
by S Demon » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:52 pm
unknown source wrote:well done valley boys showed some fight and kept us to second spot, bit disappointed with Plympton and not being competitive today, woudn't surprise me if rosewater took you guys out...
i must admit valleys must have the best home crowd support (some were weird) in the comp with spurring the their team on it felt like a 19th man out there and it was hard to get over the top of them at times but full credit to the young lads, defiantly be a force in a few years if they can keep there crop unlike previous years..
by The Bartman » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:57 pm
S Demon wrote:unknown source wrote:well done valley boys showed some fight and kept us to second spot, bit disappointed with Plympton and not being competitive today, woudn't surprise me if rosewater took you guys out...
i must admit valleys must have the best home crowd support (some were weird) in the comp with spurring the their team on it felt like a 19th man out there and it was hard to get over the top of them at times but full credit to the young lads, defiantly be a force in a few years if they can keep there crop unlike previous years..
I reckon the support from the balcony helped get the boys over the line against Plympton earlier in the year.
Poor old Coombs, I bet he wished he'd kept quiet during the B grade game. Was left a little red-faced limping off during the A grade warm up...Came in for a beer afterwards though which was good to see
by Footy Chick » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:58 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad.
by hawkseye » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:51 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad. 22 goals scored tells me it wasnt as bad as everyone suggests, a 10 goal game would probably have been more likely if it was so muddy. perhaps some of you guys should play at etihad (under the roof) so you dont get muddyuse to play on ovals like that most winters in the old days
by TIRED TIGER » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:22 pm
by hawkseye » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:35 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:demonseye wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad. 22 goals scored tells me it wasnt as bad as everyone suggests, a 10 goal game would probably have been more likely if it was so muddy. perhaps some of you guys should play at etihad (under the roof) so you dont get muddyuse to play on ovals like that most winters in the old days
Cmon TT good players keep their feet and dont get dirty
thats why that centrals outfit you use to wear to training was always clean hey![]()
seems to be the only ones not grizzling about the valley oval are the players who have to train there twice a week and play on it every other week
by human blanket #3 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:47 pm
cossi11 wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:After playing at Hope Valleys oval on the weekend with a turf pitch I would much rather play on an oval with a sand covered cricket pitch.
Agree! i dont think i have ever seen an oval in worse condition than that! to kick 14goals on that was a great effort...
by Honda07 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:42 am
TIRED TIGER wrote:demonseye wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad. 22 goals scored tells me it wasnt as bad as everyone suggests, a 10 goal game would probably have been more likely if it was so muddy. perhaps some of you guys should play at etihad (under the roof) so you dont get muddyuse to play on ovals like that most winters in the old days
Cmon TT good players keep their feet and dont get dirty
thats why that centrals outfit you use to wear to training was always clean hey![]()
seems to be the only ones not grizzling about the valley oval are the players who have to train there twice a week and play on it every other week
by Neville Bartoss » Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:28 pm
by fish » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:00 pm
S Demon wrote:Draft copy of the finals. To be confirmed Tuesday 9.00am
Saturday 21st August, 2010
Qualifying Final
12.15pm Div 5R Plympton v Adelaide Lutheran @ Eric Sutton Reserve
Elimination Final
2.15pm Div 5 Rosewater v Plympton @ Eric Sutton Reserve
Elimination Final
12.15pm Brahma Lodge v Hope Valley @ Brahma Lodge
Qualifying Final
2.15pm Brahma Lodge v Elizabeth @ Brahma Lodge
by The Dark Knight » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:26 pm
Neville Bartoss wrote:Someone give unknown source a drink.....this forum has got boring all of a sudden
by The Dark Knight » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:59 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:apart from the cricket pitch the rest of the oval wasnt too bad. 22 goals scored tells me it wasnt as bad as everyone suggests, a 10 goal game would probably have been more likely if it was so muddy. perhaps some of you guys should play at etihad (under the roof) so you dont get muddyuse to play on ovals like that most winters in the old days
by The Dark Knight » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:09 pm
cossi11 wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:After playing at Hope Valleys oval on the weekend with a turf pitch I would much rather play on an oval with a sand covered cricket pitch.
Agree! i dont think i have ever seen an oval in worse condition than that! to kick 14goals on that was a great effort...
by carey » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:51 pm
The Bartman wrote:S Demon wrote:unknown source wrote:well done valley boys showed some fight and kept us to second spot, bit disappointed with Plympton and not being competitive today, woudn't surprise me if rosewater took you guys out...
i must admit valleys must have the best home crowd support (some were weird) in the comp with spurring the their team on it felt like a 19th man out there and it was hard to get over the top of them at times but full credit to the young lads, defiantly be a force in a few years if they can keep there crop unlike previous years..
I reckon the support from the balcony helped get the boys over the line against Plympton earlier in the year.
Poor old Coombs, I bet he wished he'd kept quiet during the B grade game. Was left a little red-faced limping off during the A grade warm up...Came in for a beer afterwards though which was good to see
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |