SA Footy

zedman wrote:

zedman wrote:

great catch wrote:We only wanna take it week by week no point getting ahead of ourself, there's no point being cocky, yes we have a good side but we train very hard to get to we're we wanna be!!

training has little to nothing to do with it..your players are just better across the board and many could play in higher grades and have previously..its that simple..its division 7..there are 9 teams only..5 of your opposing teams are C grades, wingfield is a basket case and north pines are only slightly better atm..HDFC the only genuine A grade team as a rival..if you dont win the flag its a massive choke..imo..

1st v 2nd
Smithfield 38.30-258 - Houghton Districts 3.3-21

i rest my case..incredible winning margin tbh..

Demon Juke wrote:

zedman wrote:

zedman wrote:

great catch wrote:We only wanna take it week by week no point getting ahead of ourself, there's no point being cocky, yes we have a good side but we train very hard to get to we're we wanna be!!

training has little to nothing to do with it..your players are just better across the board and many could play in higher grades and have previously..its that simple..its division 7..there are 9 teams only..5 of your opposing teams are C grades, wingfield is a basket case and north pines are only slightly better atm..HDFC the only genuine A grade team as a rival..if you dont win the flag its a massive choke..imo..

1st v 2nd
Smithfield 38.30-258 - Houghton Districts 3.3-21
i rest my case..incredible winning margin tbh..

1st Smithfield - 2nd North Pines??

Q. wrote:Sometimes nothing goes right Sass. It's a lesson for many of the lads - football is played in two directions.

great catch wrote:Our use of the ball was the best we played all year, instead of using our forwards to do all the work it left our onballers open and there the ones that done most of the scoring for us, was a great first quarter but after that we had to dig deap

Jetters wrote:

great catch wrote:Our use of the ball was the best we played all year, instead of using our forwards to do all the work it left our onballers open and there the ones that done most of the scoring for us, was a great first quarter but after that we had to dig deap

You won by 200 points and you had to 'dig deep'? No ya didn't.

great catch wrote:

Jetters wrote:

great catch wrote:Our use of the ball was the best we played all year, instead of using our forwards to do all the work it left our onballers open and there the ones that done most of the scoring for us, was a great first quarter but after that we had to dig deap

You won by 200 points and you had to 'dig deep'? No ya didn't.

Was 14 points in it at 1/4 time the end result may seem like we didn't have to dig deep but after 1/4 time we had to and that's why we kicked 30+ goals after that!

zedman wrote:

great catch wrote:

Jetters wrote:

great catch wrote:Our use of the ball was the best we played all year, instead of using our forwards to do all the work it left our onballers open and there the ones that done most of the scoring for us, was a great first quarter but after that we had to dig deap

You won by 200 points and you had to 'dig deep'? No ya didn't.

Was 14 points in it at 1/4 time the end result may seem like we didn't have to dig deep but after 1/4 time we had to and that's why we kicked 30+ goals after that!

Q. wrote:I did find one moment to laugh on Saturday, when one supporter suggested that I should have stayed at Mawson Lakes

The_Informer wrote:

Q. wrote:I did find one moment to laugh on Saturday, when one supporter suggested that I should have stayed at Mawson Lakes

Must off been the hairstyle that got them confused?

Q. wrote:

The_Informer wrote:

Q. wrote:I did find one moment to laugh on Saturday, when one supporter suggested that I should have stayed at Mawson Lakes

Must off been the hairstyle that got them confused?

All us bald phuckers look the same

marbles wrote:next year when we see smithfield go up to div 6 and angle come down to div 7, will we once again see the smithfield boys going back to angle vale and give divvy 6 a miss yeah huh huh lol

great catch wrote:

marbles wrote:next year when we see smithfield go up to div 6 and angle come down to div 7, will we once again see the smithfield boys going back to angle vale and give divvy 6 a miss yeah huh huh lol

We have 3 angle vale boys back don't think it would make a difference

marbles wrote:

great catch wrote:

marbles wrote:next year when we see smithfield go up to div 6 and angle come down to div 7, will we once again see the smithfield boys going back to angle vale and give divvy 6 a miss yeah huh huh lol

We have 3 angle vale boys back don't think it would make a difference

haha yeah poor angle vales really, they got to such a great height now not quite so

marbles wrote:next year when we see smithfield go up to div 6 and angle come down to div 7, will we once again see the smithfield boys going back to angle vale and give divvy 6 a miss yeah huh huh lol