SAAFL Division 3 & D3R (2012)

[The Big Shrek]

Is there any more news re the allegation surrounding Kilburn and the abuse of the APPS ...they still have all their points on the SAAFL website ..... was it just BS or is it an X-File ??

On front page of "footy budget" say Kilburn 0-4, 0 pts, fined $3000. Of course playing salisbury this week. Would say they will be a little upset. Should be interesting game, GF replay from Div 4 last year.

Don't think it has been finalised yet.

[The Big Shrek]

Is the budget up? Can't find it.

[hawkseye]

Is there any more news re the allegation surrounding Kilburn and the abuse of the APPS ...they still have all their points on the SAAFL website ..... was it just BS or is it an X-File ??

On front page of "footy budget" say Kilburn 0-4, 0 pts, fined $3000. Of course playing salisbury this week. Would say they will be a little upset. Should be interesting game, GF replay from Div 4 last year.

They made a bit of an "oopsie" then, didn't they?

That oopsie is 5 points over.

[Lightning McQueen]

That oopsie is 5 points over.

tomatoes, tomato's

[no_remorse28]

Reading the Budget from talking amateurs there is nothing on Kilburn and they still have there wins on the ladder

[valleys07]

Is the budget up? Can't find it.

Try this link shrek:

http://www.talkingamateurs.com.au/Budge ... und_05.pdf

[no_remorse28]

just heard the club is obviously challenging it, heard the player to put them over may have been one who was there for all his junior football. Im not up to date on the ruling of it but doesnt that mean he doesnt go against points

[turk186]

just heard the club is obviously challenging it, heard the player to put them over may have been one who was there for all his junior football. Im not up to date on the ruling of it but doesnt that mean he doesnt go against points

If this is anywhere near fact I wonder how the league will ask them to justify it, I have no idea how good the record keeping is when it comes to junior footy.... does it depend on club records ( which could be in various shades of grey) or association records (like NEMJFA).
Im no expert on the APPS but I was aware that juniors came at 0 points and find it difficult to believe that someone at Kilburn who was responsible for entering player information would not have been aware of player APPS and the application of them..... sounds a little convenient IMO if this turns out to be the case

[Yardy Lard]

just heard the club is obviously challenging it, heard the player to put them over may have been one who was there for all his junior football. Im not up to date on the ruling of it but doesnt that mean he doesnt go against points

If this is anywhere near fact I wonder how the league will ask them to justify it, I have no idea how good the record keeping is when it comes to junior footy.... does it depend on club records ( which could be in various shades of grey) or association records (like NEMJFA).
Im no expert on the APPS but I was aware that juniors came at 0 points and find it difficult to believe that someone at Kilburn who was responsible for entering player information would not have been aware of player APPS and the application of them..... sounds a little convenient IMO if this turns out to be the case

Could be a more than interesting to see what happens. Have heard 20 different version of everts and some answers add up and some don't. Some are less than flattering from both parties. Will be interesting to see what actually happens. Someone or a number of people are going to have egg on their face though - from which ever party has got it wrong so far in proceedings. Let us wait and see.

[Cash 123]

Reading the Budget from talking amateurs there is nothing on Kilburn and they still have there wins on the ladder

The first version of the Budget which was online Wednesday Afternoon had an article on the front page covering the Kilburn Topic. Since then, that version was taken down and a new version without that article is now online. Yardy Lard the Media Manager may have taken action.

[no_remorse28]

Craig Allen is who I heard, He played in the u/16's flag in early 2000 in the side with Chad Parks, Darren Francis and so on, and when I was a junior there was always in the side above me most of the time I was there and can remember, again its just what I heard, im sure there is other versions

[Yardy Lard]

Reading the Budget from talking amateurs there is nothing on Kilburn and they still have there wins on the ladder

The first version of the Budget which was online Wednesday Afternoon had an article on the front page covering the Kilburn Topic. Since then, that version was taken down and a new version without that article is now online. Yardy Lard the Media Manager may have taken action.

Giving Yardy a bit too much credit there. Yardy has no idea what you are on about...........................

[Footy Chick]

Rubbish

You said that you were 100% on the story and the outcome.

Why the renig?

[FOURTH ESTATE]

Needs to have played 25 games as a junior to qualify as 0 pts

[TEX07]

Needs to have played 25 games as a junior to qualify as 0 pts

If so he would have done that no problems, his family has been around Kilburn for ever.

[test]

Needs to have played 25 games as a junior to qualify as 0 pts

If so he would have done that no problems, his family has been around Kilburn for ever.

I would of thought he'd played the required games in the seniors anyway, he must of played 3 or 4 years of senior footy previously.

Do the 25 games include juniors and seniors, or is it one or the other??

[Boosh]

just heard the club is obviously challenging it, heard the player to put them over may have been one who was there for all his junior football. Im not up to date on the ruling of it but doesnt that mean he doesnt go against points

If this is anywhere near fact I wonder how the league will ask them to justify it, I have no idea how good the record keeping is when it comes to junior footy.... does it depend on club records ( which could be in various shades of grey) or association records (like NEMJFA).
Im no expert on the APPS but I was aware that juniors came at 0 points and find it difficult to believe that someone at Kilburn who was responsible for entering player information would not have been aware of player APPS and the application of them..... sounds a little convenient IMO if this turns out to be the case

We submitted all our recruited players details to Kylie at SAAFL and she was able to tell us exactly how many games they had played and who for. If it is outside of SAAFL she requests info from the other league. We had two players that had played 23 and 24 junior games for us and are subsequently worth points, which is just the way it goes.

[The Big Shrek]

Needs to have played 25 games as a junior to qualify as 0 pts

If so he would have done that no problems, his family has been around Kilburn for ever.

I would of thought he'd played the required games in the seniors anyway, he must of played 3 or 4 years of senior footy previously.

Do the 25 games include juniors and seniors, or is it one or the other??

Bullfrog is zero, that has never been in dispute.

[test]

Needs to have played 25 games as a junior to qualify as 0 pts

If so he would have done that no problems, his family has been around Kilburn for ever.

I would of thought he'd played the required games in the seniors anyway, he must of played 3 or 4 years of senior footy previously.

Do the 25 games include juniors and seniors, or is it one or the other??

Bullfrog is zero, that has never been in dispute.

His name was bought up a few posts back and as I said I assumed he would be a zero pointer.

[FOURTH ESTATE]

just heard the club is obviously challenging it, heard the player to put them over may have been one who was there for all his junior football. Im not up to date on the ruling of it but doesnt that mean he doesnt go against points

If this is anywhere near fact I wonder how the league will ask them to justify it, I have no idea how good the record keeping is when it comes to junior footy.... does it depend on club records ( which could be in various shades of grey) or association records (like NEMJFA).
Im no expert on the APPS but I was aware that juniors came at 0 points and find it difficult to believe that someone at Kilburn who was responsible for entering player information would not have been aware of player APPS and the application of them..... sounds a little convenient IMO if this turns out to be the case

We submitted all our recruited players details to Kylie at SAAFL and she was able to tell us exactly how many games they had played and who for. If it is outside of SAAFL she requests info from the other league. We had two players that had played 23 and 24 junior games for us and are subsequently worth points, which is just the way it goes.

Depends on the age of when they played and the APPS defining what is a junior from memory