by gothebombers » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:56 pm
by '00'02'03'07 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:58 pm
by gothebombers » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:22 pm
by manbitesdog » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:58 pm
by '00'02'03'07 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:52 am
by Keepitreal » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:47 am
'00'02'03'07 wrote:It would be hard to say at this stage. Havent really heard much about how they have recruited and whether they have lost any players from last year.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:53 am
Keepitreal wrote:'00'02'03'07 wrote:It would be hard to say at this stage. Havent really heard much about how they have recruited and whether they have lost any players from last year.
Have heard through the footy vine that they have picked up more defecting from Smithfield, but could be a rumour and nothing more.
by Q. » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:54 am
Keepitreal wrote:'00'02'03'07 wrote:It would be hard to say at this stage. Havent really heard much about how they have recruited and whether they have lost any players from last year.
Have heard through the footy vine that they have picked up more defecting from Smithfield, but could be a rumour and nothing more.
by Tigers93-94 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:55 am
Quichey wrote:Keepitreal wrote:'00'02'03'07 wrote:It would be hard to say at this stage. Havent really heard much about how they have recruited and whether they have lost any players from last year.
Have heard through the footy vine that they have picked up more defecting from Smithfield, but could be a rumour and nothing more.
LOL, I have heard the reverse of that.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:00 am
Quichey wrote:Keepitreal wrote:'00'02'03'07 wrote:It would be hard to say at this stage. Havent really heard much about how they have recruited and whether they have lost any players from last year.
Have heard through the footy vine that they have picked up more defecting from Smithfield, but could be a rumour and nothing more.
LOL, I have heard the reverse of that.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:12 am
Quichey wrote:Heading which way LM?
by Q. » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:22 am
by Browny25 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:41 pm
by finn » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:15 pm
gothebombers wrote:then the grade might be....ovies,nth pines, houghton, st pauls , flinders uni, adel uni,angle vale, mitchell pk as an 8 team A and B grade comp..and 9 if wingies have 2..i doubt theyll put any of the other c and d grade teamsfrom last year in as henley and shoc are all div 1 with 4 teams so and also modbury ttg are div 1 and smosh and athelstone are div 2 with 4 teams, mitcham are div3 golden grove div 4 are the other sideswith 4 teams, prob should bring back c6...should look like....modbury henley shoc ttg c1 and c6 or even c5(as c5 looks doomed)athelstone c2 and c5/6 , smosh c2 and c5/6 mitcham c3 and c5/6 ggrove c4 and c5/6.....dont be surprised if they go something like this
by Tigers93-94 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:29 pm
by Keepitreal » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:47 pm
Tigers93-94 wrote:Finn
Brahma Lodge are definitley in Div 6 & either Houghton or Helnley will be with them - all because of the Edwardstown move
Div 7 will be a mixture as usual
by Tigers93-94 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Keepitreal wrote:Tigers93-94 wrote:Finn
Brahma Lodge are definitley in Div 6 & either Houghton or Helnley will be with them - all because of the Edwardstown move
Div 7 will be a mixture as usual
Houghton will not nominate to stay up, have lost players and came last will only be in for another hard season and much the same result unless they can recruit strongly & Henley will not go up exercising their right to stay down being C & D grade sides.
by Bigshow82 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:19 pm
Tigers93-94 wrote:Keepitreal wrote:Tigers93-94 wrote:Finn
Brahma Lodge are definitley in Div 6 & either Houghton or Helnley will be with them - all because of the Edwardstown move
Div 7 will be a mixture as usual
Houghton will not nominate to stay up, have lost players and came last will only be in for another hard season and much the same result unless they can recruit strongly & Henley will not go up exercising their right to stay down being C & D grade sides.
Keepitreal
I think you will find that Henley will have to go up if Houghton dont want to stay up - the rule only works if both clubs agree - at least thats how I had it explained to me from a very smart club operator out Salisbury North way
by carey » Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:48 pm
Bigshow82 wrote:Tigers93-94 wrote:Keepitreal wrote:Tigers93-94 wrote:Finn
Brahma Lodge are definitley in Div 6 & either Houghton or Helnley will be with them - all because of the Edwardstown move
Div 7 will be a mixture as usual
Houghton will not nominate to stay up, have lost players and came last will only be in for another hard season and much the same result unless they can recruit strongly & Henley will not go up exercising their right to stay down being C & D grade sides.
Keepitreal
I think you will find that Henley will have to go up if Houghton dont want to stay up - the rule only works if both clubs agree - at least thats how I had it explained to me from a very smart club operator out Salisbury North way
I think that Henley should go up. Why should they stay down in Div 7 just because they are a C & D Grade side? Just because Houghton are an A & B Grade side they should not have to struggle and have another bad season that will only hurt the club. Henley is a big enough club that they could handle going up to Div 6 and finish at the bottom end of the ladder, which I doubt they would as they were good enough to push Paralowie in the GF last season.
My 2 cents worth.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |