by boozehound » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:14 pm
by sprinttospace » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:24 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:last kick of the day for blacks was in the process of being marked by blacks forward as siren sounded. umpire paid correct decision(1 of the few for the day) that siren had sounded before he controlled it. very lucky escape for the valleys and i must admit blacks would be the best side relegated from div 5 for a very long time if not ever. we always have close games against them with all but 1 game being under a 12 point margin in 6 games.
by human blanket #3 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:24 pm
custardarm wrote:pfranny wrote:custardarm wrote:Quichey wrote:Dunno. Stupid? Maybe the fella blinked or got a fly in his eye.
I'm just suggesting that a cheat isn't going to want to get caught, which is why they probably won't call against the obvious.
or maybe he knows he can do this with impunity and lets be honest what can anyone do , answer nothing, look he is 2 for 2 with us this year funny how they had no one else and he was filling in when 9 rounds ago he did it aswell unfortunately these things blight your opinion of footy clubs for the rest of your life shame for the good people at the clubs
Your making yourself sound like a total clown the person who umpired yesterday did not umpire against you 9 rounds ago. these things happen get over it the outcome of that game doesnt change the fact that you are 4 games behind us... a team that " isnt even that good" and the fact is you still havent played us when we are any where near full strength maybe if you put in the same amount of effort towards training as u do complaining on here you might be in a different position
you keep believing that buddy and you are the same club that had your a grade players on the sunday after your gf win abusing and challenging to fights players in an under 15 grand final that was being played at your ground
by Footy Chick » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:42 pm
sprinttospace wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:last kick of the day for blacks was in the process of being marked by blacks forward as siren sounded. umpire paid correct decision(1 of the few for the day) that siren had sounded before he controlled it. very lucky escape for the valleys and i must admit blacks would be the best side relegated from div 5 for a very long time if not ever. we always have close games against them with all but 1 game being under a 12 point margin in 6 games.
now that the dust has settled life has continued to go on and the sun appeared this morning.
certainly seemed to be a few of our lads last night that agree with you TT, first grab before siren, second one after. wouldn't have wanted to be on the buzzer yesterday tight games are a killer when you've got the stop watch in your hand.
our battles have certainly been intense and tight over the last 3 years.
just horrible decision making both ways yesterday highlighted by the yellow cards being given by the ump 40 meters away while the one that was in control of the play just stood and watched what was happening. so many non decisions and so many decisions that should have been left.
FC - apologies for bellowing in your ear at the end of that fracas. you did well not to turn and tell us to pull our heads in. this season is detroying my ability to remain calm
by custardarm » Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:50 pm
human blanket #3 wrote:
one incident happened when we gave an elizabeth playing a few words after he tried to hit someone. we just won a grand final and there is a game happening at our club, of course we are going to yell out a few words. from what i remember on that day we were pretty well behaved. im sure elizabeth is a perfect club having your match official telling our goal umpire "gd luck if you leave the ground alive"
by fido bedow » Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:36 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Good win by plympton yesterday.... Hard fought game...
by mypaddock » Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:05 am
boozehound wrote:Want to make a couple of points if I may....
Firstly what is wrong with someone actually getting on here and saying "gee u were ripped off". Instead u get comments like "oh but what about the other decision that went over the post and clearly through for a point". Did it go over the post or go "clearly" through for a point. I wasn't there but it doesn't quite seem to be in the same category.
Someone brought up a valid point saying that if the player didn't call him a cheat another kick would not have been awarded... Atleast the comment is correct and makes sense. I agree however as a player that on the odd occassion is inclined to disagree with an umpire, decisions like this one seems to be are ******* infuriating and the natural and possibly correct inference is drawn that the guy is a cheat. We need to protect umpires from crazy abuse but wat about protecting the integrity of the game.
Fact is for Elizabeth is that we are four games behind top. It is not the first time this year a game we won has been taken off us. Hectorville are obviously a very good side It just seems we gave their measure. They too have not faced us any where near full strength. Brahma IMO are a much harder match up for us and if they got over the hoodoo the heccies seem to have on them would beat them comfortably. Ok that's all
by The Ash Man » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:48 pm
sprinttospace wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:last kick of the day for blacks was in the process of being marked by blacks forward as siren sounded. umpire paid correct decision(1 of the few for the day) that siren had sounded before he controlled it. very lucky escape for the valleys and i must admit blacks would be the best side relegated from div 5 for a very long time if not ever. we always have close games against them with all but 1 game being under a 12 point margin in 6 games.
now that the dust has settled life has continued to go on and the sun appeared this morning.
certainly seemed to be a few of our lads last night that agree with you TT, first grab before siren, second one after. wouldn't have wanted to be on the buzzer yesterday tight games are a killer when you've got the stop watch in your hand.
our battles have certainly been intense and tight over the last 3 years.
just horrible decision making both ways yesterday highlighted by the yellow cards being given by the ump 40 meters away while the one that was in control of the play just stood and watched what was happening. so many non decisions and so many decisions that should have been left.
FC - apologies for bellowing in your ear at the end of that fracas. you did well not to turn and tell us to pull our heads in. this season is detroying my ability to remain calm
by unknown source » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:06 pm
EddieV wrote:Jabber wrote:unknown source wrote:looking forward to North Havens canteen this week with our c grade playing after the a grade, with all the hype i can't wait
be good not to run out of hot water also
Steer clear of the adelaide uni oval #2 bbq in the C grade... $4 for 1 sausage!
What???? do you get a BJ or something with that sausage?
by MadDog » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:14 pm
by zedman » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:26 pm
MadDog wrote:Anyone had John Petruzelli umpire any games this season?
If so, what has been like?
He did the Plympton V Rosewater game on the weekend.
Would hope he hardens up a little.
2x25m due to the crowd
A player sent off for being too loud
And from two different accounts, was the hardest, roughest & dirtiest game he has ever umpired.
And I am sure all will agree who were present, there has been and will be better physical battles than the contest at Plympton on the weekend.
by Drop Bear » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:38 pm
by sprinttospace » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:03 pm
Footy Chick wrote:sprinttospace wrote:TIRED TIGER wrote:last kick of the day for blacks was in the process of being marked by blacks forward as siren sounded. umpire paid correct decision(1 of the few for the day) that siren had sounded before he controlled it. very lucky escape for the valleys and i must admit blacks would be the best side relegated from div 5 for a very long time if not ever. we always have close games against them with all but 1 game being under a 12 point margin in 6 games.
now that the dust has settled life has continued to go on and the sun appeared this morning.
certainly seemed to be a few of our lads last night that agree with you TT, first grab before siren, second one after. wouldn't have wanted to be on the buzzer yesterday tight games are a killer when you've got the stop watch in your hand.
our battles have certainly been intense and tight over the last 3 years.
just horrible decision making both ways yesterday highlighted by the yellow cards being given by the ump 40 meters away while the one that was in control of the play just stood and watched what was happening. so many non decisions and so many decisions that should have been left.
FC - apologies for bellowing in your ear at the end of that fracas. you did well not to turn and tell us to pull our heads in. this season is detroying my ability to remain calm
Think nothing of it. I didn't even see you (or hear you for that matter) anywayWas too busy trying to stop your No.17 from causing an all in and getting our guys in a bundle. Had I known a few of your guys better I probably would have said something, I've been involved in enough dust ups over the years to know when to butt in and when not to.
![]()
But it was a bitch of a game all round really and we were lucky to walk away with the points. Bloody lucky.
by Neville Bartoss » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:12 pm
by MadDog » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:21 pm
these 25m's for "crowd or spectators" are getting pandemic..what is the exact ruling on this..as in..what rule are they calling on to give 25m penalties..is there even a rule or are we being hoodwinked?
by Neville Bartoss » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:36 pm
by zedman » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:39 pm
MadDog wrote:these 25m's for "crowd or spectators" are getting pandemic..what is the exact ruling on this..as in..what rule are they calling on to give 25m penalties..is there even a rule or are we being hoodwinked?
I think they are just making the rules up!
SAAFL Rules & Regs
21.1 A 25-metre penalty may be enforced by a field umpire(s) where an umpire deems it to be applicable as per Law 18.1 of the Laws of Australian Football.
Laws of Australian Football
18.1 Where a field Umpire has awarded a Free Kick or a Mark to a Player, the field Umpire shall also award a Fifty-Metre Penalty in favour of that Player if he or she is of the opinion that any Player or Official from the opposing side:
So unless every spectator is deemed to be an official, the answer is they can't do it. Unless of course the SAAFL hasn't updated their rules and regs.
by Footy Chick » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:43 pm
sprinttospace wrote:
as for the end of the game, i wouldn't single out one of our players, lots of people invovled in that caffuffle. i've heard there were some nasties taking place in there and of course the call of 'p!ss off back to div 6' no doubt helped the situation.
in the end it settled pretty quickly and everyone went their own way.
by sprinttospace » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:51 pm
Neville Bartoss wrote:Forgive my ignorance but im trying to get my head around how percentage is calculated on the premiership ladder
Hectorville are currently 1385 to 777 with a differance of 608 and a percentage of 64.1 whilst Brahma Lodge are 1497 to 894 with a difference of 603 and a percentage of 62.6. I dont understand how there is a difference between the scores of 5 points yet the percentage difference is 1.5 per cent. Does this mean that if (for arguments sake) Brahma played Heccies this week and beat them by 6 points they would have a superior percentage?
by The Bartman » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:52 pm
Neville Bartoss wrote:Forgive my ignorance but im trying to get my head around how percentage is calculated on the premiership ladder
Hectorville are currently 1385 to 777 with a differance of 608 and a percentage of 64.1 whilst Brahma Lodge are 1497 to 894 with a difference of 603 and a percentage of 62.6. I dont understand how there is a difference between the scores of 5 points yet the percentage difference is 1.5 per cent. Does this mean that if (for arguments sake) Brahma played Heccies this week and beat them by 6 points they would have a superior percentage?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |