SAAFL Div 6 2008

[scottroo]

A Brown played the last 6 or so games in the B grade after playing early in the year in the A grade, played the last H and A game in the Bs, played the first final, had an injury during the week so got the call up, how is that not fair?

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.

yeah thats cool, but i think they reward a team for making both finals, weve had allot of injuries this year, if someone isnt picked to play As, no matter what i think they should be able to play Bs, be interested to see what happens if our Bs win this week, and our As lose, we may find ourself not having some players for the grand final

[The Ash Man]

get over it trinity. any b grader c grader d grader can play A grade as long as they have played the required 4 games for the yr.

full credit must go to WOS for yesterdays performance. Dominated from the outset and Heccies didn't come to play.
Also congrats to HV or gaining promotion. As soon as Heccies dropped that game in rd 18 to hand them the double chance I had a feeling they would go straight thru to the GF.

And just to follow up on the catering discussion from last week at WOS I must say the ladies working on the BBQ have clearly never cooked nor worked a day in their lives. 4 women working on a BBQ taking 5 minutes to make a steak sandwich. Waited ten minutes in line to get a sausage FFS! And there was only 3 ppl in the line!

For the bbq comments


Shocking catering again
$4 for a pattie that is the size of a 50c piece, what a joke
Add $2 for cheese and lettuce

[Trinity]

Scorpion wrote:
Trinity wrote:
Scorpion wrote:





Sorry, I thought I read TG saying Trinity B Grade coach was told no players from CLG B Grade last week can play A Grade this week?. My mistake...........or is it?


Yes thats what she wrote? Im a bit confused? Im pretty sure she might know what the B Grade coach has been told cause she is married to him!
The B Grade coach was told this by the SAAFL.

I know what she said and what you said, my original question was, why are you enquiring and ringing the SAAFL last week - your team wasn't even playing. Can you imagine how many phone calls they would've had last Monday - and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Anyway unless you get anything in writing in answer to your SAAFL questions, good luck proving what they did/didn't say.


your team wasn't even playing. Trinity B Grade played CLG??????
You dont hold back on what you think do you, Maybe its too much water and healthy sandwiches and not enough sugar why you are so grumpy NOSY PARKER ok i am Trinity's B Grade coach and we played CLG in that 1st final so i rang the SAAFL on monday to enquire about the rules, my boys had to have played majority of games to qualify for the final but CLG had boys in the final that had only played 1 or 2 B Grade games for the year, so i rang to clarify the rules if thats ok with you!

Also im lead to believe paralowie has it in pretty clear writing their permit they applied for got denied by the SAAFL because the player played in the B Grade final the week prior.

and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Maybe check your facts before going round calling people nosy parkers !

On the contrary Trinity, there wasnt any sandwiches and the bottled water ran out.

maybe she needs a beer, i know i do.

[gothebombers]

trinity wrote......while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals ........i think youll find that none of these guys played in the A s the following week,,more than likely played B s again...is this right

[SteveStevens]

They have to pay their players somehow. WOS may have the overpriced BBQ, CLG whack you $5 for a park when there's plenty of space on the street free of charge. Probably the most money to be made at an SAAFL final is to have a tracksuit levy on arrival.

[hawkseye]

Scorpion wrote:
Trinity wrote:
Scorpion wrote:





Sorry, I thought I read TG saying Trinity B Grade coach was told no players from CLG B Grade last week can play A Grade this week?. My mistake...........or is it?


Yes thats what she wrote? Im a bit confused? Im pretty sure she might know what the B Grade coach has been told cause she is married to him!
The B Grade coach was told this by the SAAFL.

I know what she said and what you said, my original question was, why are you enquiring and ringing the SAAFL last week - your team wasn't even playing. Can you imagine how many phone calls they would've had last Monday - and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Anyway unless you get anything in writing in answer to your SAAFL questions, good luck proving what they did/didn't say.


your team wasn't even playing. Trinity B Grade played CLG??????
You dont hold back on what you think do you, Maybe its too much water and healthy sandwiches and not enough sugar why you are so grumpy NOSY PARKER ok i am Trinity's B Grade coach and we played CLG in that 1st final so i rang the SAAFL on monday to enquire about the rules, my boys had to have played majority of games to qualify for the final but CLG had boys in the final that had only played 1 or 2 B Grade games for the year, so i rang to clarify the rules if thats ok with you!

Also im lead to believe paralowie has it in pretty clear writing their permit they applied for got denied by the SAAFL because the player played in the B Grade final the week prior.

and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Maybe check your facts before going round calling people nosy parkers !

On the contrary Trinity, there wasnt any sandwiches and the bottled water ran out.

maybe she needs a beer, i know i do.

Shes a bundy a girl mate and had too much last night

[The Ash Man]

Scorpion wrote:
Trinity wrote:
Scorpion wrote:





Sorry, I thought I read TG saying Trinity B Grade coach was told no players from CLG B Grade last week can play A Grade this week?. My mistake...........or is it?


Yes thats what she wrote? Im a bit confused? Im pretty sure she might know what the B Grade coach has been told cause she is married to him!
The B Grade coach was told this by the SAAFL.

I know what she said and what you said, my original question was, why are you enquiring and ringing the SAAFL last week - your team wasn't even playing. Can you imagine how many phone calls they would've had last Monday - and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Anyway unless you get anything in writing in answer to your SAAFL questions, good luck proving what they did/didn't say.


your team wasn't even playing. Trinity B Grade played CLG??????
You dont hold back on what you think do you, Maybe its too much water and healthy sandwiches and not enough sugar why you are so grumpy NOSY PARKER ok i am Trinity's B Grade coach and we played CLG in that 1st final so i rang the SAAFL on monday to enquire about the rules, my boys had to have played majority of games to qualify for the final but CLG had boys in the final that had only played 1 or 2 B Grade games for the year, so i rang to clarify the rules if thats ok with you!

Also im lead to believe paralowie has it in pretty clear writing their permit they applied for got denied by the SAAFL because the player played in the B Grade final the week prior.

and then there are people like yourself (without a team in) ringing up to ask questions that the clubs involved should be asking - not nosy parkers.
Maybe check your facts before going round calling people nosy parkers !

On the contrary Trinity, there wasnt any sandwiches and the bottled water ran out.

maybe she needs a beer, i know i do.

Shes a bundy a girl mate and had too much last night

she sure did!!!!

[Scorpion]

A Brown played the last 6 or so games in the B grade after playing early in the year in the A grade, played the last H and A game in the Bs, played the first final, had an injury during the week so got the call up, how is that not fair?

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.

One thing you'll never get from SAAFL is logic and sense. You'll probably find it boils down to no-one checking or authorising team sheets at Tynte St or wherever they are based now.
Have you or TG ever thought of putting out a book?
Cheers
PS I'm still waiting for my hamburger to cook - they've just put the egg on.

[Trinity]

A Brown played the last 6 or so games in the B grade after playing early in the year in the A grade, played the last H and A game in the Bs, played the first final, had an injury during the week so got the call up, how is that not fair?

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.

yeah thats cool, but i think they reward a team for making both finals, weve had allot of injuries this year, if someone isnt picked to play As, no matter what i think they should be able to play Bs, be interested to see what happens if our Bs win this week, and our As lose, we may find ourself not having some players for the grand final

Yeah well you would be hoping that doesnt happen seems your A's have had a good season but i guess you never know, i honestly didnt think HV A's would be going to the GF i say that with no disrespect intended, well done to them they have played well in the last couple of weeks but didnt expect it.
and if Trinity had both teams in the finals i too would have been very happy going into finals with the 4 game rule no doubt, but being on the other side i guess i just think the rules should be a little more even for both side competing.

[Footy Chick]

I have an "ear-ie" feeling this argument is going to go on forever..damn it..where's Barta

[Scorpion]

I have an "ear-ie" feeling this argument is going to go on forever..damn it..where's Barta

Heard Barta is the newest recruit on the Edinburgh Comedy Festival!

[Trinity]

trinity wrote......while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals ........i think youll find that none of these guys played in the A s the following week,,more than likely played B s again...is this right

Im not sure if they played again in the B's i know they didnt play play A Grade. My question about Brown just really came about because i know a few boys at Paralowie and what they had happen this week and also because it was the same thing the SAAFL told me on monday and when i checked CLG team sheet Friday A Brown was named on the team sheet and no permit on the SAAFL site was applied for? So just thought i would try and fish around for other peoples views on what the rules R or R NOT?

[scottroo]

A Brown played the last 6 or so games in the B grade after playing early in the year in the A grade, played the last H and A game in the Bs, played the first final, had an injury during the week so got the call up, how is that not fair?

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.

yeah thats cool, but i think they reward a team for making both finals, weve had allot of injuries this year, if someone isnt picked to play As, no matter what i think they should be able to play Bs, be interested to see what happens if our Bs win this week, and our As lose, we may find ourself not having some players for the grand final

Yeah well you would be hoping that doesnt happen seems your A's have had a good season but i guess you never know, i honestly didnt think HV A's would be going to the GF i say that with no disrespect intended, well done to them they have played well in the last couple of weeks but didnt expect it.
and if Trinity had both teams in the finals i too would have been very happy going into finals with the 4 game rule no doubt, but being on the other side i guess i just think the rules should be a little more even for both side competing.

we are going to have to be at our very best this weekend, cant wait

tips people?

[The Ash Man]

I have an "ear-ie" feeling this argument is going to go on forever..damn it..where's Barta

Thats GOLD

[hawkseye]

Harvey in or out?

[observer]

[quote="Trinity"][quote="scottroo"][quote="Trinity"][quote="scottroo"]A Brown played the last 6 or so games in the B grade after playing early in the year in the A grade, played the last H and A game in the Bs, played the first final, had an injury during the week so got the call up, how is that not fair?[/quote]

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.[/quote]

yeah thats cool, but i think they reward a team for making both finals, weve had allot of injuries this year, if someone isnt picked to play As, no matter what i think they should be able to play Bs, be interested to see what happens if our Bs win this week, and our As lose, we may find ourself not having some players for the grand final[/quote]


Yeah well you would be hoping that doesnt happen seems your A's have had a good season but i guess you never know, i honestly didnt think HV A's would be going to the GF i say that with no disrespect intended, well done to them they have played well in the last couple of weeks but didnt expect it.
and if Trinity had both teams in the finals i too would have been very happy going into finals with the 4 game rule no doubt, but being on the other side i guess i just think the rules should be a little more even for both side competing.[/quote]

TRINITY simple as this ,your A grade wasnt close to top 5 ,your team made up the numbers in finals mate ...get two teams in finals then its open slather selection just as WOS HV HECCIES AND CLG did....just get over it well done HV and WOS

[Trinity]

I have an "ear-ie" feeling this argument is going to go on forever..damn it..where's Barta

sorry i will quit complaining bout it it doesnt affect me anymore anyway just thought i would try get some answers from others but im more confused then when i started

[hawkseye]

I have an "ear-ie" feeling this argument is going to go on forever..damn it..where's Barta

sorry i will quit complaining bout it it doesnt affect me anymore anyway just thought i would try get some answers from others but im more confused then when i started

Good option Trinity. Good luck next year.

[Trinity]

Mate i have no problems with that i know he played 11 A Grade games and 6 B Grade games for the season, its just what SAAFL told me, that a permit would have to be applied for if any player that went up and i didnt see any permit applied for so that is why i questioned it? Also paralowie played with 21 on saturday because a player was denied to play for that same reason so i ask why is it fair for CLG and not for paralowie? Thats what im trying to find out?

I do have a problem tho that because we didnt have a A Grade in finals ours boys had to have played majority B Grade games to qualify and that one of my boys that had played 10 A Grade and 8 B Grade wasnt allowed to play while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals but just disagree that A Graders that have played majority A Grade games should be allowed to go down. Im aware its in the rules but i just dont agree.

As for Browny playing this week the SAAFL told me that NONE of those A Graders that played last week were allowed to play A Grade this week so thats why im questioning it? Im not trying to winger just disagree with a few things i have come across in the last few weeks.

yeah thats cool, but i think they reward a team for making both finals, weve had allot of injuries this year, if someone isnt picked to play As, no matter what i think they should be able to play Bs, be interested to see what happens if our Bs win this week, and our As lose, we may find ourself not having some players for the grand final

Yeah well you would be hoping that doesnt happen seems your A's have had a good season but i guess you never know, i honestly didnt think HV A's would be going to the GF i say that with no disrespect intended, well done to them they have played well in the last couple of weeks but didnt expect it.
and if Trinity had both teams in the finals i too would have been very happy going into finals with the 4 game rule no doubt, but being on the other side i guess i just think the rules should be a little more even for both side competing.

TRINITY simple as this ,your A grade wasnt close to top 5 ,your team made up the numbers in finals mate ...get two teams in finals then its open slather selection just as WOS HV HECCIES AND CLG did....just get over it well done HV and WOS

Of course you are going to say that And A Grade finished 6th mate so my maths would make that pretty close to 5 is that right?

[gothebombers]

trinity wrote......while you guys could play #29 that had played only (4) A Grade games and (1) B Grade game for the year, and another #23 (3) A Grade and (3) B Grade, another #38 (4) A Grade and (2) B Grade and also #40 (10) A Grade (2) B Grade. How is that fair? I think players should be allowed to go up in finals ........i think youll find that none of these guys played in the A s the following week,,more than likely played B s again...is this right

Im not sure if they played again in the B's i know they didnt play play A Grade. My question about Brown just really came about because i know a few boys at Paralowie and what they had happen this week and also because it was the same thing the SAAFL told me on monday and when i checked CLG team sheet Friday A Brown was named on the team sheet and no permit on the SAAFL site was applied for? So just thought i would try and fish around for other peoples views on what the rules R or R NOT?

for the paralowie instance i think youll find its in the wording......player named in A team as a replacment hasnt played in 12 weeks.......also A brown didnt need to get a permit as the free interchange rule would apply as clg had the a s and b s participating in finals and browny had played the last 6 plus a final...no permit req.....