Footy Chick wrote:Stop yer bitching![]()
Now you can go and re-post this in the correct thread thanks
About bloody time

by Hefty » Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:56 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Stop yer bitching![]()
Now you can go and re-post this in the correct thread thanks
by Shark_Hunter » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:27 pm
X Runna wrote:Money talks here boys, therell be no shakin the buffalos away
by Haynzy » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:01 pm
johnny bravo wrote:Yank Man wrote:Div 7 no doubt has to have C grade teams Atm, but please let's not have them complaining about playing A grade clubs. TTG and Henley, 2 great and strong clubs, would have played in 9 out of 10 Grand Finals in Div 7 in 2012, but ran in to the best Div 7 A grade team in a very long time. Sorry but Mitchell Park are going to be Div 5 or better very soon if their structures and players stay together which I am confident they will. Div 7 needs C grade teams but only the best will do and Henley will only make clubs like UniSa and Ovingham pale in to insignifigance. If the current proposed standings apply then Henley would be odds on to take out the flag and maybe join Adel Uni in Div 6. My thoughts only on what I know and have seen. Banter all you like.
So modestFunny thing is I've spoken to a heap of guys who played Div 7 last year and consensus was the comp was much weaker this season than it was in previous ones, they even said both yourselves & TTG wouldn't have got close to the 2 grand finalists of 2011 so who's lying? I went to the GF and I can tell you neither of you would have made the top 5 in Div 6 this year but please keep posting about it so it keeps inflating your ego and makes you feel good about yourself.
by mozzie » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:39 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:X Runna wrote:marbles wrote:Money talks here boys, therell be no shakin the buffalos away
I don't know about money, but there has to be something going on. Someone mentioned the delegates voting on it at the meeting last night. What's the bet after the inept committee put it to the floor the vote was carried about 58 to 9? 58 clubs who don't give a f**k & just follow the proposal because it doesn't affect them and the 9 clubs who are in Div7 voting against it.
You guys are so far off the mark on UniSA it is not funny. The club is being put together by a group of players from the successful UniSA Basketball Club who got enough interest from friends etc that they thought they would try to get a footy club up and running for the first time in over 19 years.
The last time UniSA had a footy club was circa 1992, straight after the merger. Antecedent institutions of UniSA including the various Teachers Colleges and SAIT had reasonable success throughout the SAAFL through the 70s and 80s in particular.
The University actually has nothing to do with sporting clubs, they are all administered and financed through the independent student association UniLife. While there is talk this may change sometime down the track, there is absolutely no way UniSA is paying anything to the UniSA Footy club or the SAAFL at this point in time.
While I won't weigh into the debate about which grade they should start in, I am just pleased to see the Uni trying to get a club together again. I imagine that a large number of UniSA students would currently end up playing for other clubs (e.g. Mawson Lakes or even Adelaide Uni) due to the lack of an option at UniSA.
I know that UniSA was trying to develop a relationship with MLFC, possibly to have a UniSA-based team start under the MLFC banner as a C or D grade side and perhaps look at furthering that relationship in future years when it was clear the UniSA contribution was beneficial for both clubs. MLFC are (understandably) a little peeved at the way it has panned out, but when a group of students wants to start a club and have enough interest to register it with UniLife, there is nothing UniSA can do to deny them.
Thought it might be useful to clarify the situation and put a stop to the ridiculous rumours floating around on here.
by The Riddler » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:43 pm
Haynzy wrote:johnny bravo wrote:Yank Man wrote:Div 7 no doubt has to have C grade teams Atm, but please let's not have them complaining about playing A grade clubs. TTG and Henley, 2 great and strong clubs, would have played in 9 out of 10 Grand Finals in Div 7 in 2012, but ran in to the best Div 7 A grade team in a very long time. Sorry but Mitchell Park are going to be Div 5 or better very soon if their structures and players stay together which I am confident they will. Div 7 needs C grade teams but only the best will do and Henley will only make clubs like UniSa and Ovingham pale in to insignifigance. If the current proposed standings apply then Henley would be odds on to take out the flag and maybe join Adel Uni in Div 6. My thoughts only on what I know and have seen. Banter all you like.
So modestFunny thing is I've spoken to a heap of guys who played Div 7 last year and consensus was the comp was much weaker this season than it was in previous ones, they even said both yourselves & TTG wouldn't have got close to the 2 grand finalists of 2011 so who's lying? I went to the GF and I can tell you neither of you would have made the top 5 in Div 6 this year but please keep posting about it so it keeps inflating your ego and makes you feel good about yourself.
I'm interested to know who you spoke to, because we came bloody close to Mawson Lakes and Sacred Heart last year but am pretty confident would have beaten them quite easily with this years team as we added 5 or 6 ex 'A' graders plus a dominant ruckman but couldn't get over the top of Mitchell Park.
by carey » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:03 pm
by Shark_Hunter » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:07 pm
mozzie wrote:Shark_Hunter wrote:X Runna wrote:marbles wrote:Its obvious that unisa are paying big money to the league maybe under the table or maybe via sponsorship cos so theres been no backward steps as the league seem quite happy to disregard their own integrity in exchange for a massive financial bonus which when put on the table did nothing but light up the eyes of all involved and like what we are seeing in this outrageous introduction to div 7, the league has simply responded by saying 'yes master, anything u wish master'
Money talks here boys, therell be no shakin the buffalos away
I don't know about money, but there has to be something going on. Someone mentioned the delegates voting on it at the meeting last night. What's the bet after the inept committee put it to the floor the vote was carried about 58 to 9? 58 clubs who don't give a f**k & just follow the proposal because it doesn't affect them and the 9 clubs who are in Div7 voting against it.
You guys are so far off the mark on UniSA it is not funny. The club is being put together by a group of players from the successful UniSA Basketball Club who got enough interest from friends etc that they thought they would try to get a footy club up and running for the first time in over 19 years.
The last time UniSA had a footy club was circa 1992, straight after the merger. Antecedent institutions of UniSA including the various Teachers Colleges and SAIT had reasonable success throughout the SAAFL through the 70s and 80s in particular.
The University actually has nothing to do with sporting clubs, they are all administered and financed through the independent student association UniLife. While there is talk this may change sometime down the track, there is absolutely no way UniSA is paying anything to the UniSA Footy club or the SAAFL at this point in time.
While I won't weigh into the debate about which grade they should start in, I am just pleased to see the Uni trying to get a club together again. I imagine that a large number of UniSA students would currently end up playing for other clubs (e.g. Mawson Lakes or even Adelaide Uni) due to the lack of an option at UniSA.
I know that UniSA was trying to develop a relationship with MLFC, possibly to have a UniSA-based team start under the MLFC banner as a C or D grade side and perhaps look at furthering that relationship in future years when it was clear the UniSA contribution was beneficial for both clubs. MLFC are (understandably) a little peeved at the way it has panned out, but when a group of students wants to start a club and have enough interest to register it with UniLife, there is nothing UniSA can do to deny them.
Thought it might be useful to clarify the situation and put a stop to the ridiculous rumours floating around on here.
Now just to let you in on a few facts, as i run football at Mawson Lakes i can tell you that not once have UniSA spoken to Mawson Lakes about joining us in a C or D grade banner. We already have a C grade side which we have had for the last couple of seasons.
As i said, they have not spoken to Mawson lakes in any way. A couple of guys who are starting this club up are actually past members of Mawson Lakes. What i can tell you, is that they have even spoken to the Uni about using our oval in front of us. If you call that trying to start a working relationship well i willl go he!
If you would like to put some more truths on here i would love to hear them.
by Yank Man » Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:13 pm
carey wrote:My god i look forward to seeing these guys results the gap between 6 and 7 is the length of south road and before rabbits get on here mouthing off about trial games pfft they are exactly that trial games.
Mawson Lakes were a better side in 2012 than 2011 and made a great fist of it in there first year to make the finals after a fantastic start to the year.
And with Rosewater and Westminster coming down and CLG getting a hell of a lot stronger i expect the fight for the top 5 to be as tough as ever....
by marbles » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:26 pm
Yank Man wrote:carey wrote:My god i look forward to seeing these guys results the gap between 6 and 7 is the length of south road and before rabbits get on here mouthing off about trial games pfft they are exactly that trial games.
Mawson Lakes were a better side in 2012 than 2011 and made a great fist of it in there first year to make the finals after a fantastic start to the year.
And with Rosewater and Westminster coming down and CLG getting a hell of a lot stronger i expect the fight for the top 5 to be as tough as ever....
Of course you are right carey, I'm stokin' the fire to take the heat of marbles.![]()
One thing you get on the Div 7 forum is fire in the belly and if you make an outlandish statement it goes for days. Gives me something to read in the off season.
by marbles » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:39 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:13 am
carey wrote:My god i look forward to seeing these guys results the gap between 6 and 7 is the length of south road and before rabbits get on here mouthing off about trial games pfft they are exactly that trial games.
Mawson Lakes were a better side in 2012 than 2011 and made a great fist of it in there first year to make the finals after a fantastic start to the year.
And with Rosewater and Westminster coming down and CLG getting a hell of a lot stronger i expect the fight for the top 5 to be as tough as ever....
by dee man » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:33 pm
morell wrote:The 2011 Mitchell Park side beat SHOC twice and had two pretty tight contests with Mawson Lakes. In fact if I had of held a mark at home against the Lakers we might have been able to overrun them. Oh well.johnny bravo wrote:they even said both yourselves & TTG wouldn't have got close to the 2 grand finalists of 2011 so who's lying?
Finals are different and we failed there, but I think its a bit of a stretch to say we wouldn't have gotten close when we beat the victors during the year. In addition the 2012 Mitchell Park side was at least 10 goals better than 2011. There is no doubt in my mind that this years MP team would have given both SHOC and Mawson Lakes a very, very serious run for their money in the 2011 GF.
Having said all that I agree if we are to make the finals in Div 6 we will need to recruit well and add some strong depth to the squad. In addition to keeping everyone. The leap from Div 7 to Div 6 is huge and we have our work cut out.
And leave Yank Man alone, he is proud of his achievements and rightly so, the turn around at Mitchell Park that he was a massive part of has been extraordinary.
by Q. » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:21 pm
by morell » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:11 am
dee man wrote:morell wrote:The 2011 Mitchell Park side beat SHOC twice and had two pretty tight contests with Mawson Lakes. In fact if I had of held a mark at home against the Lakers we might have been able to overrun them. Oh well.johnny bravo wrote:they even said both yourselves & TTG wouldn't have got close to the 2 grand finalists of 2011 so who's lying?
Finals are different and we failed there, but I think its a bit of a stretch to say we wouldn't have gotten close when we beat the victors during the year. In addition the 2012 Mitchell Park side was at least 10 goals better than 2011. There is no doubt in my mind that this years MP team would have given both SHOC and Mawson Lakes a very, very serious run for their money in the 2011 GF.
Having said all that I agree if we are to make the finals in Div 6 we will need to recruit well and add some strong depth to the squad. In addition to keeping everyone. The leap from Div 7 to Div 6 is huge and we have our work cut out.
And leave Yank Man alone, he is proud of his achievements and rightly so, the turn around at Mitchell Park that he was a massive part of has been extraordinary.
hi morgs
after watching several div 6 games and the same amount of div 7 games last year ,the lions would have finished in the bottom half between 6 and 8
even tho i was rapt for the club and believe they played some really good footy,the div 6 i saw this year was back around the quality of several seasons ago,when paralowie,brahma lodge,heccies ect were at the top of their game in div 6
for the lions to mount an attack on the top five they would need to recruit 5 to 6 quality players for the areas they will struggle in
by moses » Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:04 am
Yank Man wrote:Div 7 no doubt has to have C grade teams Atm, but please let's not have them complaining about playing A grade clubs. TTG and Henley, 2 great and strong clubs, would have played in 9 out of 10 Grand Finals in Div 7 in 2012, but ran in to the best Div 7 A grade team in a very long time. Sorry but Mitchell Park are going to be Div 5 or better very soon if their structures and players stay together which I am confident they will. Div 7 needs C grade teams but only the best will do and Henley will only make clubs like UniSa and Ovingham pale in to insignifigance. If the current proposed standings apply then Henley would be odds on to take out the flag and maybe join Adel Uni in Div 6. My thoughts only on what I know and have seen. Banter all you like.
by 1 club » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:19 pm
Pag wrote:Flinders Park and Modbury slated to be in D8, Broadview in D7.
by Gatt_Weasel » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:56 am
by Q. » Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:12 pm
by old fullback » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |