SA Footy

Really? The club has had at least 37 weeks of suspensions in just over 3 years after a bloody pretty serious incident. What do you expect to happen?

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Really? The club has had at least 37 weeks of suspensions in just over 3 years after a bloody pretty serious incident. What do you expect to happen?

We did our maths today, in 6 years, 3 guilty players for a cumlative total of three weeks. In each of those 6 years we've fielded 5 sides under the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

It's not that hard to keep your nose clean

jo172 wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Really? The club has had at least 37 weeks of suspensions in just over 3 years after a bloody pretty serious incident. What do you expect to happen?

We did our maths today, in 6 years, 3 guilty players for a cumlative total of three weeks. In each of those 6 years we've fielded 5 sides under the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

It's not that hard to keep your nose clean

Well done you

jo172 wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Really? The club has had at least 37 weeks of suspensions in just over 3 years after a bloody pretty serious incident. What do you expect to happen?

We did our maths today, in 6 years, 3 guilty players for a cumlative total of three weeks. In each of those 6 years we've fielded 5 sides under the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

It's not that hard to keep your nose clean

You wanna biscuit for being a good boy?

The Bedge wrote:

jo172 wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Really? The club has had at least 37 weeks of suspensions in just over 3 years after a bloody pretty serious incident. What do you expect to happen?

We did our maths today, in 6 years, 3 guilty players for a cumlative total of three weeks. In each of those 6 years we've fielded 5 sides under the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

It's not that hard to keep your nose clean

You wanna biscuit for being a good boy?

No you are the worst brown noser take a leaf from Shrek’s book and go on a bender

Don't worry he did do just that I strongly suspect!

No clearances will be processed for this week. All will be processed from Monday.[/quote]
Clearances processed already and both played for South today[/quote]


The money they are throwing around in the BL&GFA would be enough to keep 10 kids for 10 years.

Lets see how good the SANFL salary cap officers go about plying their trade with this or will they surrender cause its just too hard?

What a toothless tiger that is, never worked before so why now?

It appears the Barossa League just does their own thing where coin is concerned.

Do BLG have a cap?

carey wrote:Do BLG have a cap?

Yes

Wasim1 wrote:No clearances will be processed for this week. All will be processed from Monday.

Clearances processed already and both played for South today[/quote]


The money they are throwing around in the BL&GFA would be enough to keep 10 kids for 10 years.

Lets see how good the SANFL salary cap officers go about plying their trade with this or will they surrender cause its just too hard?

What a toothless tiger that is, never worked before so why now?

It appears the Barossa League just does their own thing where coin is concerned.[/quote]
Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

carey wrote:Do BLG have a cap?

I believe there is a figure that a set of books has to be under for the perusal of the CFB, so i guess the answer is yes, However the netball clubs dont and theres probably a few city boys who are proud owners of a few head of cattle or a few tonne of wheat and some bottles of fermented grape juice.

mighty hounds wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

Yep, all clear at South

mighty hounds wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

Not from the numbers I'm hearing, but I wouldn't expect any knock at the door from the SACFL. Isn't the max for a player (outside the marquee) $500?

daysofourlives wrote:One might be forgiven for thinling that this happens with such monotonous regularity in the ammos that the heirachy actually love the bit of me time they get in the media when they hand down such a penalty.

Surely you'd had a skinful when you posted this? Do you really think that JK would take pride in having to front the media to deliver such news that the board had decided on?
It's a blight on the AdFL so I'm sure they'd prefer to get through each season unscathed from the media, I do hope Salisbury North bounce back (and I'm sure they will) and I do hope that Stengle's punishment is reduced to allow him to continue to play in the AdFL.
My grassroot club has been on the arse end of simmilar sanctions and it changed their culture immensely all the way through to the spectators who'd pull others spectators up for anything that could go against the club.

Pag wrote:

mighty hounds wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

Not from the numbers I'm hearing, but I wouldn't expect any knock at the door from the SACFL. Isn't the max for a player (outside the marquee) $500?

Do you really think with the likes of Jackson Press who wouldn't get out of bed for less than $800 and now the Hay brothers plus their others that they wouldn't be over, you must still believe in the tooth fairy!!!!

I hear that one of the Tribunal Board members last week made a rather bold and unnecessary statement along the lines of:

You should have got rid of him years ago!!!

One might think if accurate and true this could be used and taken a bit further perhaps??

Wasim1 wrote:

Pag wrote:

mighty hounds wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

Not from the numbers I'm hearing, but I wouldn't expect any knock at the door from the SACFL. Isn't the max for a player (outside the marquee) $500?

Do you really think with the likes of Jackson Press who wouldn't get out of bed for less than $800 and now the Hay brothers plus their others that they wouldn't be over, you must still believe in the tooth fairy!!!!

Couldn’t care less what you or others think. The BL&G clubs know they are under the microscope and will be ensuring everything is legit

Wasim1 wrote:

Pag wrote:

mighty hounds wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Lol
There is currently 1 club definitely being investigated and another rumoured to be.
Some clubs would be well under the cap so it’s easy to fit them in

South Gawler clean

Not from the numbers I'm hearing, but I wouldn't expect any knock at the door from the SACFL. Isn't the max for a player (outside the marquee) $500?

Do you really think with the likes of Jackson Press who wouldn't get out of bed for less than $800 and now the Hay brothers plus their others that they wouldn't be over, you must still believe in the tooth fairy!!!!

My 10 year lad got a $20 from the tooth fairy yesterday so must be real

Garner and Webber in the mix also. Bit of coin there

Wasim1 wrote:I hear that one of the Tribunal Board members last week made a rather bold and unnecessary statement along the lines of:

You should have got rid of him years ago!!!

One might think if accurate and true this could be used and taken a bit further perhaps??

I think you're way outside off there mate, why the hell would they say that?