Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:32 amPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 11:10 amPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:39 pmbeeroclock wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
We have lost around six to Broadview through Nth Adelaide connection this year out of our U15 side.
Now we have 12 on the track and look like not having a side.
One side gone.
It's bullshit.
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:33 pmbeeroclock wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
We have lost around six to Broadview through Nth Adelaide connection this year out of our U15 side.
Now we have 12 on the track and look like not having a side.
One side gone.
It's bullshit.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:36 amThe Dark Knight wrote:gadj1976 wrote:hillscrow wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Very good hitout for us against Rosewater today, we won both A and B grade games, the ideal result for us heading into round one next Saturday against Westminster. I was very happy with all the boys efforts today, everyone gave it a red hot crack. We hit the footy hard, the defensive pressure was very good and most of our ball movement was quite good. Exactly the kind of hitout we needed going into next week, big thanks to Rosewater for the hitout. Footy is back f**k yeah.
Rosewater have got big wraps...how'd they look?
They are much taller than us and looked quite good. I think the final score was something like 13.4 to 6.14 (not trying to be controversial, I didn't see the final score i was running around after my 5 year old!) which meant they had plenty of it. From what I saw, they should've been a lot closer. They looked fit. They ran well. They look to be well drilled too. They'll do well in Div 6.
From our perspective, we ran out of soldiers. Three blokes out with over a quarter to go in warm conditions didn't help but those guys out there did exceptionally well.
Well said Gadj, I think Rosies A grades first eight shots on goal were behinds? It was very tough out there in the warm conditions, definitely going to have some very sore fellas today, hopefully everyone pulled up ok.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:52 amHH3 wrote:I think our backline worked extremely well, (aside from myself, pretty average really), which is awesome considering its only our 2nd hitout, and hopefully we can improve on this game going into the real stuff this weekend.
But your goal save attempt in the last quarter I think? was awesome.Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:10 amPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:33 amThe Dark Knight wrote:HH3 wrote:I think our backline worked extremely well, (aside from myself, pretty average really), which is awesome considering its only our 2nd hitout, and hopefully we can improve on this game going into the real stuff this weekend.
They certainly did, don't expect anything different from you though mate
)Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:35 amHH3 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:HH3 wrote:I think our backline worked extremely well, (aside from myself, pretty average really), which is awesome considering its only our 2nd hitout, and hopefully we can improve on this game going into the real stuff this weekend.
They certainly did, don't expect anything different from you though mate
Thats how I roll mate. I dont get a kick, but neither does the poor bastard im gonna annoy all day. 1%ers are 99% of my game.
(got a nice little shirtfront in there too
Anyway, enough about me...how goods **** FOOTY!!!
I was a bit worried about how our season was gonna go this year with all the guys that left, but now, after playing two games, Im very happy with who we have now, and the way the team works together is a massive improvement on last year.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:48 amPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:55 amHH3 wrote:No. 9 I think. Wasn't a big one, fair, play on and he got straight up.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:16 pmjake the snake wrote:Some great games this weekend anyone brave enough to top
Elizabeth v clg
greenies v ph
Wos v havens
cbc v bl
tos v adel luth
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:24 pmHH3 wrote:I was a bit worried about how our season was gonna go this year with all the guys that left, but now, after playing two games, Im very happy with who we have now, and the way the team works together is a massive improvement on last year.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:43 pmbeeroclock wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
We have lost around six to Broadview through Nth Adelaide connection this year out of our U15 side.
Now we have 12 on the track and look like not having a side.
One side gone.
It's bullshit.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:49 pmLook Good In Leather wrote:beeroclock wrote:Boosh wrote:Pag wrote:We have a junior from our club, went to Port, and is now at Port District, with no other connections that I can see.
We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
We have lost around six to Broadview through Nth Adelaide connection this year out of our U15 side.
Now we have 12 on the track and look like not having a side.
One side gone.
It's bullshit.
This is one of the reasons why the SANFL is dying. The clubs have this whole high and mighty attitude that we are merely feeder clubs to them. We encourage our best talent out to them and get nothing in return.
What they do not wish to accept is that a premiership for Rostrevor, or Reynella, or Uraidla, or Barossa Districts means no less to those clubs than an SANFL premiership does to Norwood, or an AFL premiership does to Hawthorn. Our existance does not revolve around providing players to our zoned club
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:50 pmjo172 wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:beeroclock wrote:Boosh wrote:We would have on average 10 a year in that boat mate, the sooner Port Adelaide lose thier juniors the better it will be for the Port Adelaide area.
We have lost around six to Broadview through Nth Adelaide connection this year out of our U15 side.
Now we have 12 on the track and look like not having a side.
One side gone.
It's bullshit.
This is one of the reasons why the SANFL is dying. The clubs have this whole high and mighty attitude that we are merely feeder clubs to them. We encourage our best talent out to them and get nothing in return.
What they do not wish to accept is that a premiership for Rostrevor, or Reynella, or Uraidla, or Barossa Districts means no less to those clubs than an SANFL premiership does to Norwood, or an AFL premiership does to Hawthorn. Our existance does not revolve around providing players to our zoned club
There is a delightful bit of irony when one considers the AFL reserves sooking on the SANFL board here the attitudes towards the SANFL held by those at the true grass roots level of football.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:49 pmFooty Chick wrote:HH3 wrote:No. 9 I think. Wasn't a big one, fair, play on and he got straight up.
No.9? Playing A's HH3? Isn't that Daniel Reardon?
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:56 pmHH3 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:HH3 wrote:No. 9 I think. Wasn't a big one, fair, play on and he got straight up.
No.9? Playing A's HH3? Isn't that Daniel Reardon?
Yeah in the A's. I dont really know any opposition players names. If they're not in the prison bars, i dont care who they are.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:07 pmFooty Chick wrote:
He's denying any shirtfront action and said it was a fair bump at best
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:18 pm