Footy Chick wrote:It's like asking who would win a fight between superman and mighty mouse
what, are you kidding FC? that's a no brainer. of course superman would win. mighty mouse is a cartoon, superman is a real guy

by bird of prey » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:18 pm
Footy Chick wrote:It's like asking who would win a fight between superman and mighty mouse
by Footy Chick » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:28 pm
bird of prey wrote:Footy Chick wrote:It's like asking who would win a fight between superman and mighty mouse
what, are you kidding FC? that's a no brainer. of course superman would win. mighty mouse is a cartoon, superman is a real guy
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Choccies » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:26 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:54 am
Choccies wrote:What a stupid discussion..... Can't believe this debate is still going....
by bara-stick » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:02 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Choccies wrote:What a stupid discussion..... Can't believe this debate is still going....
Yeah, Mighty Mouse is way stronger.
by morell » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:38 pm
We actually have to turn people away to help with Juniors. Thanks for precisely proving my point that its not always about the people or culture within a club which brings either a downfall or success. the football equation is a lot more complicated and difficult. To sum everything up involved in making a football club a success with one concise hyperbole - "get a good culture" - is pure folly.Jetters wrote:morell wrote:So you're saying that if you play youre football in a lower Div you have bad culture as a club, and the people involved are incompetent?
I understand your overall point eg good people = good culture = good club, but the rest of your post is a whole pile of condescending horse crap.
There is so much more to what determines a clubs standing than just a good culture. Sure its part of it, but its not the whole enchilada. Plenty of very successful clubs have had terrible cultures and plenty of ordinary clubs on the field have had great cultures off it.
Our year a while ago in Div 6 when we got smashed week in week out we were fantastic in terms of discipline, volunteering, financially, culturally etc we had a great person from a great club coaching ... but we didn't have the players!
The main reason Mitchell Park are in division 7 is because of the high density of competitive clubs around us, demographic and population shifts, no backing from an Old Scholar pool and a historically poor reputation of thuggery - so maybe one out 4 or 5 reaons could be tied to a "cultural" issue. The people running our club right now would slot into just about any other club very easily, in fact, most of them have done so in the past - Happy Valley, Edwardstown, Kilburn to name a few.
Think I am going to add this one to morell's Football Myth Busters episode 1.
Why don't more people then put up their hands to develop your juniors then!!!!
by Yank Man » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:34 pm
morell wrote:We actually have to turn people away to help with Juniors. Thanks for precisely proving my point that its not always about the people or culture within a club which brings either a downfall or success. the football equation is a lot more complicated and difficult. To sum everything up involved in making a football club a success with one concise hyperbole - "get a good culture" - is pure folly.Jetters wrote:morell wrote:So you're saying that if you play youre football in a lower Div you have bad culture as a club, and the people involved are incompetent?
I understand your overall point eg good people = good culture = good club, but the rest of your post is a whole pile of condescending horse crap.
There is so much more to what determines a clubs standing than just a good culture. Sure its part of it, but its not the whole enchilada. Plenty of very successful clubs have had terrible cultures and plenty of ordinary clubs on the field have had great cultures off it.
Our year a while ago in Div 6 when we got smashed week in week out we were fantastic in terms of discipline, volunteering, financially, culturally etc we had a great person from a great club coaching ... but we didn't have the players!
The main reason Mitchell Park are in division 7 is because of the high density of competitive clubs around us, demographic and population shifts, no backing from an Old Scholar pool and a historically poor reputation of thuggery - so maybe one out 4 or 5 reaons could be tied to a "cultural" issue. The people running our club right now would slot into just about any other club very easily, in fact, most of them have done so in the past - Happy Valley, Edwardstown, Kilburn to name a few.
Think I am going to add this one to morell's Football Myth Busters episode 1.
Why don't more people then put up their hands to develop your juniors then!!!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |