by CoverKing » Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:42 pm
by gothebombers » Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:52 pm
by carey » Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:14 pm
by hawkseye » Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:04 pm
carey wrote:anyone else started training yet or is it just paralowie? i'm hearing the boys were put through some crazy running and a heap of time trials we didnt do anything like last year did we? although i didnt do pre season last year either it does still seem crazy to me starting pre season at the start of november! i thought it was called AMATURE league for a reason???????? oh well i gues it'll help out the ehhh bigger blokes like myself!![]()
![]()
by shoe boy » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:40 am
by Bully » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:40 pm
Bold Strategy wrote:CoverKing wrote:Farbs wrote:CoverKing wrote:Lockleys to win the flag with some recruits that will fit into their side nicely. A couple big fellas heading there way just to stengthen their side. A premiership in the a's is what there looking to acheive(as all other sides are) but my sources say there recruits from the higher grades are going to sit nicely in there side
They were certainly pretty good last year, with some good young players. Certainly a few extra big blokes will help their cause! Reckon they will be up there!
and i have heard there picking up some blokes 6'1 ish which will be handy for them! They were really good last year, except there last 3 games of the year...maybe got a bit ahead of themselves but i think being a young side they will learn!
6'1 is is barely tall, they definately did lack tall players last year and but were very good at home
by The Ash Man » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:53 pm
by Footy Chick » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:06 pm
by The Ash Man » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:36 pm
Footy Chick wrote:How tall is Chop Chop then? He's rather tall..
by Bully » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:40 pm
The Ash Man wrote:Footy Chick wrote:How tall is Chop Chop then? He's rather tall..
Thats who i was talking about
he is 6'9 or 6'11
by zedman » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:41 pm
by scottroo » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:18 pm
lightning quick wingman, good skills...good player, why do you askshoe boy wrote:Anyone from CLG give me the heads up on Adam Harris/Kellow??
by S Demon » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:23 pm
Bulldog wrote:The Ash Man wrote:Footy Chick wrote:How tall is Chop Chop then? He's rather tall..
Thats who i was talking about
he is 6'9 or 6'11
pretty tall then i gathercan be some debate on if you can have a 'to tall' ruckman tho, taller ruckman arent that good in running usually and can bring a running side down, but can stop things in backlines etc. anyone want to add ??
by CoverKing » Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:30 am
by Bully » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:23 am
CoverKing wrote:well IMO you dont see many 6"9 ruckmans in the lower division of the amateurs. obviously there are exceptions as stated above but is it beneficial?? he may win the taps but other ruckmen may dominate against him around the ground n run him off his feet? but at the same time he could have numerous taps to advantage that are priceless! 'either or' a 6"9 ruckman would b welcomed into all division 6 sides thats for sure..
by CoverKing » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:26 am
Bulldog wrote:CoverKing wrote:well IMO you dont see many 6"9 ruckmans in the lower division of the amateurs. obviously there are exceptions as stated above but is it beneficial?? he may win the taps but other ruckmen may dominate against him around the ground n run him off his feet? but at the same time he could have numerous taps to advantage that are priceless! 'either or' a 6"9 ruckman would b welcomed into all division 6 sides thats for sure..
agreed can work to a teams favour but on the other hand it cant, might be better for a 6'4 - 6'6 ruckman that can at least keep good running pace well thats my view anyway
by Bully » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:29 am
CoverKing wrote:Bulldog wrote:CoverKing wrote:well IMO you dont see many 6"9 ruckmans in the lower division of the amateurs. obviously there are exceptions as stated above but is it beneficial?? he may win the taps but other ruckmen may dominate against him around the ground n run him off his feet? but at the same time he could have numerous taps to advantage that are priceless! 'either or' a 6"9 ruckman would b welcomed into all division 6 sides thats for sure..
agreed can work to a teams favour but on the other hand it cant, might be better for a 6'4 - 6'6 ruckman that can at least keep good running pace well thats my view anyway
agreed! eg: a jared brennan style ruckman has been used in the AFL all be it extremely rarely but even at the highest level, running ability can sometimes count more for a ruckman then the ability to tap the ball. because at the end of the day if ur constantly losing the ruck taps, ur on ballers can read the ball off the opposing ruckman
by Tigers93-94 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:43 am
by CoverKing » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:44 am
Tigers93-94 wrote:Browny
Who were the 3 18 year olds that signed last night at The Lodge
Will a certain Division 1 Club not be happy that the are gone?
I also heard that your B Grade coach fell through - Why?
by Q. » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:48 am
CoverKing wrote:and what club is that Browny???
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |