by LaughingKookaburra » Sat Jan 31, 2015 6:45 am
by morell » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:50 pm
by Cohiba » Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:35 pm
morell wrote:LK is spot on.
People see the weaker sides in the SFL get pumped by 40 goals and think they must be absolutely terrible, but you have to keep in mind the quality of the opposition at the top end in the SFL. It's the equivalent of a side like Mawson Lakes or Lockleys playing Goodwood or Henley's A's. They'd get pumped by similar margins I'd suspect.
by marbles » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:41 pm
by Yank Man » Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:58 pm
by Q. » Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:15 pm
norm11 wrote:Mitchell park by 10 goal.
by marbles » Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:38 pm
by Cohiba » Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:01 pm
Q. wrote:All this debate about the SFL from this quote :norm11 wrote:Mitchell park by 10 goal.
Which was actually referring to the Mawson Lakes game as opposed to the Lonsdale game
Lol
by Q. » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:36 pm
Cohiba wrote:Q. wrote:All this debate about the SFL from this quote :norm11 wrote:Mitchell park by 10 goal.
Which was actually referring to the Mawson Lakes game as opposed to the Lonsdale game
Lol
After 15933 posts Q your amused that people "debate" in a forum...........
by Cohiba » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:30 pm
Q. wrote:Cohiba wrote:Q. wrote:All this debate about the SFL from this quote :norm11 wrote:Mitchell park by 10 goal.
Which was actually referring to the Mawson Lakes game as opposed to the Lonsdale game
Lol
After 15933 posts Q your amused that people "debate" in a forum...........
I'm easily amused.
by norm11 » Sun Feb 01, 2015 4:58 pm
Q. wrote:All this debate about the SFL from this quote :norm11 wrote:Mitchell park by 10 goal.
Which was actually referring to the Mawson Lakes game as opposed to the Lonsdale game
Lol
by morell » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:19 am
by Q. » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:48 am
morell wrote:Turn it up. Yank Man mentioned the Lonsdale game, Rob Stark the headless git said that should be a interesting game, I then said inb4 it will be a nil all draw then norm said Mitchell Park by 10 goal. How could anyone think he was talking about the aforementioned ML game!?!
by Bombers4EVA » Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:00 pm
Q. wrote:morell wrote:Turn it up. Yank Man mentioned the Lonsdale game, Rob Stark the headless git said that should be a interesting game, I then said inb4 it will be a nil all draw then norm said Mitchell Park by 10 goal. How could anyone think he was talking about the aforementioned ML game!?!
The sheer absurdity of suggesting you would beat Lonsdale by 10 goals is why I knew he was referring to ML.
by Robb_Stark » Mon Feb 02, 2015 1:44 pm
by Q. » Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:07 pm
Bombers4EVA wrote:Q. wrote:morell wrote:Turn it up. Yank Man mentioned the Lonsdale game, Rob Stark the headless git said that should be a interesting game, I then said inb4 it will be a nil all draw then norm said Mitchell Park by 10 goal. How could anyone think he was talking about the aforementioned ML game!?!
The sheer absurdity of suggesting you would beat Lonsdale by 10 goals is why I knew he was referring to ML.
Hey Q. Has Div 7 been finalised yet?
by norm11 » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:07 pm
by Happy Endings » Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:15 pm
by marbles » Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:59 pm
by tomo » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
marbles wrote:ive heard that div 7 may only have 6 sides
houghton
angle vale
mitchell park
flinders uni
north pines
salisbury west
playing each other 3 times
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |