Shirtfront wrote:Really can't go past Uni's, Athelstone and Edwardstown for top 3 i wouldn't think. Will either of the teams coming up have a chance.
Well you rekon the Raggies are a chance

by Blue Boy » Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:06 am
Shirtfront wrote:Really can't go past Uni's, Athelstone and Edwardstown for top 3 i wouldn't think. Will either of the teams coming up have a chance.
by NO-MERCY » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:24 pm
Shirtfront wrote:Really can't go past Uni's, Athelstone and Edwardstown for top 3 i wouldn't think. Don't think Modbury will have the goods to push those teams this year, Payneham might lack a little too. Will either of the teams coming up have a chance. Should be a lot more even comp though you'd hope, now that Woodville Sth and Kilburn are out, was like having 2 byes.
by schimma » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:23 am
by Andy #24 » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:59 am
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:27 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Talking to a couple of guys from Modbury last night and they think that their ins will more than cover their losses this year. Gunning from the YP is a gun and Modbury only missed out on the GF by a couple of kicks last year. I think they will do better than a lot of people expect.
by Newman » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:39 pm
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:00 pm
Newman wrote:Agreed about Modbury especially with Rankine in home detention
by Newman » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:06 pm
by NO-MERCY » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:24 pm
Newman wrote:I believe they do perhaps Greenacres is the club for him
by Andy #24 » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:11 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Talking to a couple of guys from Modbury last night and they think that their ins will more than cover their losses this year. Gunning from the YP is a gun and Modbury only missed out on the GF by a couple of kicks last year. I think they will do better than a lot of people expect.
The've got no show, a couple of kicks sounds very little Andy, don't let the scoreboard fall you as far as the end result.
Seaton smashed them all day, it was only the last 15 mins that they got a little run on, due to the tired legs from a hard intense 2nd semi final against Pt Districts, oh & a few hand me downs from those terrible maggots who umpired the day.
If Seaton won that 2nd semi, who knows what could of happened in the GF?
As for Modbury settle for 4th or 5th.
by Footy Chick » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:36 pm
by schimma » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:44 am
Falcon Chick wrote:Modbury had the wood over Seaton for the best part of the year. Unfortunately not when it counted though.
Uni will be a formiddable opponent, because they are Uni...
My mother told me to always watch out for the quiet onesEdwardstown (remember them?) have been VERY quiet over the summer and cannot be discounted, you can't NOT rate a team that's been demoted.
PHOS have also been quiet, not much known of their goings on..I've heard that PHOS will be Glenelg unders players 1st choice of club next year if they're not playing for the Bays? Will this help or hinder? It didn't seem to do Scotch any good last year. Sure it got them to the finals, but then the Sturt boys disappeared and so did Scotch.
I just hate predicting these things until the first bounce.
by White Unicorn » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:50 am
Falcon Chick wrote:Modbury had the wood over Seaton for the best part of the year. Unfortunately not when it counted though.
Uni will be a formiddable opponent, because they are Uni...
My mother told me to always watch out for the quiet onesEdwardstown (remember them?) have been VERY quiet over the summer and cannot be discounted, you can't NOT rate a team that's been demoted.
PHOS have also been quiet, not much known of their goings on..I've heard that PHOS will be Glenelg unders players 1st choice of club next year if they're not playing for the Bays? Will this help or hinder? It didn't seem to do Scotch any good last year. Sure it got them to the finals, but then the Sturt boys disappeared and so did Scotch.
I just hate predicting these things until the first bounce.
by Footy Chick » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:56 am
by barbs » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:31 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:40 am
barbs wrote:Glenelgs theory is to issue all clubs in their area with the names of players that may not get a game at the same time. However I think sometimes one particular club in the Southern league seems to get a bit of a head start.
by FootyMad » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:41 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:48 am
FootyMad wrote:SANFL clubs have no real say over where players go, they can suggest a club (which the young kids will normally take up) but in the main blokes can and do end up everywhere.
by Felch » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:50 am
Falcon Chick wrote:FootyMad wrote:SANFL clubs have no real say over where players go, they can suggest a club (which the young kids will normally take up) but in the main blokes can and do end up everywhere.
I can tell you that we lost 2 Sturt blokes last year because they were told to go to Scotch, apparently Scotch was their "preferred" club.
We managed to keep one, only becuase he had signed with us before training with Sturt, but Sturt tried their hardest to sign him up at Scotch too.. we wouldn't release him, so he stayed. Unfortunately we won't see much of this kid this year as he dominated in the Sturt ressies at the end of last year.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |