Page 164 of 224

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:12 pm
by giffo
Lockleys As- 42, Bs 54 & Cs 62.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:13 pm
by morell
How the **** do you find this out?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:15 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili
Phantom Gossiper wrote:The only problem with Mitchell Parks jumper over the years is that shade of green.. it's definitely "an aquired taste".

Isn't it the same shade of green that Ingle Farm had when they were formed?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:20 pm
by Phantom Gossiper
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:The only problem with Mitchell Parks jumper over the years is that shade of green.. it's definitely "an aquired taste".

Isn't it the same shade of green that Ingle Farm had when they were formed?

It's still horrible :lol:

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:28 pm
by Phantom Gossiper
Well seems that number isn't so unusual after all Arch.

A Grade
66 - Angle Vale
43 - Lockleys
42 - Mawson Lakes
39 - Mitchell Park
38 - Fitzroy
38 - West Croydon
36 - Rosewater
34 - Blackfriars
34 - Central United
33 - Ingle Farm

B Grade
80 - Angle Vale
69 - Fitzroy
62 - Ingle Farm
59 - West Croydon
57 - Blackfriars
54 - Lockleys
51 - Mawson Lakes
50 - Rosewater
48 - Central United
43 - Flinder Uni

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 6:50 pm
by mighty hounds
Mr Beefy wrote:
Arch44 wrote:No mention of Rumbelow?

I'm sure you know already given Dallas is at Rosies a couple of times a week.


Miss Beefy. What goes on at rosewater this time if year? Two years in a row of players leaving/unrest in the group after a flying start just to crumble like soggy biscuits?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:10 pm
by norm11
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Well seems that number isn't so unusual after all Arch.

A Grade
66 - Angle Vale
43 - Lockleys
42 - Mawson Lakes
39 - Mitchell Park
38 - Fitzroy
38 - West Croydon
36 - Rosewater
34 - Blackfriars
34 - Central United
33 - Ingle Farm

B Grade
80 - Angle Vale
69 - Fitzroy
62 - Ingle Farm
59 - West Croydon
57 - Blackfriars
54 - Lockleys
51 - Mawson Lakes
50 - Rosewater
48 - Central United
43 - Flinder Uni

Angle vales numbers are huge. So do they just have a problem keeping them interested?? Or are those numbers deceiving?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:23 pm
by Arch44
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Well seems that number isn't so unusual after all Arch.

A Grade
66 - Angle Vale
43 - Lockleys
42 - Mawson Lakes
39 - Mitchell Park
38 - Fitzroy
38 - West Croydon
36 - Rosewater
34 - Blackfriars
34 - Central United
33 - Ingle Farm

B Grade
80 - Angle Vale
69 - Fitzroy
62 - Ingle Farm
59 - West Croydon
57 - Blackfriars
54 - Lockleys
51 - Mawson Lakes
50 - Rosewater
48 - Central United
43 - Flinder Uni


Bloody hell.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:01 pm
by marbles
Arch44 wrote:
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Well seems that number isn't so unusual after all Arch.

A Grade
66 - Angle Vale
43 - Lockleys
42 - Mawson Lakes
39 - Mitchell Park
38 - Fitzroy
38 - West Croydon
36 - Rosewater
34 - Blackfriars
34 - Central United
33 - Ingle Farm

B Grade
80 - Angle Vale
69 - Fitzroy
62 - Ingle Farm
59 - West Croydon
57 - Blackfriars
54 - Lockleys
51 - Mawson Lakes
50 - Rosewater
48 - Central United
43 - Flinder Uni


Bloody hell.



so angle vale's list of 66 names, will truly list 66 different individuals? no duplicates?

and like morell said - where u get this from?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:25 pm
by Phantom Gossiper
All I did was copy all the season stats out of the SAAFL site which lists every player to play in that grade, then did a pivot table with a count of players per team.

I dare say Angle Vales numbers are so high because most if not all would've played both grades, and I'm sure they would've grabbed blokes where they could to fill voids each week in the B grade.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:35 pm
by The Informer
You can run a report thru sportingpulse which tells you the numbers. Mawson Lakes numbers are individual numbers and no duplicates in the grade, some people have played more than one grade

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:01 pm
by Yank Man
The_Informer wrote:You can run a report thru sportingpulse which tells you the numbers. Mawson Lakes numbers are individual numbers and no duplicates in the grade, some people have played more than one grade


Hahaha, yeah, but don't tell marbles. ;)

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:13 pm
by norm11
Angle vale have still had 66 guys play a grade for them. You only need 42 to film 2 teams.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:23 pm
by X Runna
norm11 wrote:Angle vale have still had 66 guys play a grade for them. You only need 42 to film 2 teams.


But how many A Grade footballers norm11?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:37 pm
by norm11
X Runna wrote:
norm11 wrote:Angle vale have still had 66 guys play a grade for them. You only need 42 to film 2 teams.


But how many A Grade footballers norm11?

Not sure. But surely u could keep guys together and be competitive. I suppose it's about keeping guys interested.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:39 pm
by marbles
X Runna wrote:
norm11 wrote:Angle vale have still had 66 guys play a grade for them. You only need 42 to film 2 teams.


But how many A Grade footballers norm11?


even if your a flog, if ya played agrade your a superstar at your club forever & ever

norm11 wrote:Angle vale have still had 66 guys play a grade for them. You only need 42 to film 2 teams.


not too many boys cleared in (clearances) but plenty cleared out - this makes the pool of players in the area even bigger than what the 66 seems?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:58 pm
by marbles
morell wrote:Blue and green should never be seen.

And you're making some massive assumptions based on stuffing around with some colours of a template marbles. Just have some fun mate.


i think thats an outstanding jumper, only took 5 minutes and my opinion is bias but it would be better than 40% of the SAAFL guernseys. blue & green is fine together (NFL - sea eagles)

youd attract more juniors with this one than the one you had now and people would wear it to public events more often than current MP jumper :D

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:09 pm
by zedman
marbles wrote:
morell wrote:Blue and green should never be seen.

And you're making some massive assumptions based on stuffing around with some colours of a template marbles. Just have some fun mate.


i think thats an outstanding jumper, only took 5 minutes and my opinion is bias but it would be better than 40% of the SAAFL guernseys. blue & green is fine together (NFL - sea eagles)

youd attract more juniors with this one than the one you had now and people would wear it to public events more often than current MP jumper :D


who wears their club guernsey to public events? :shock:

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:16 pm
by Q.
Paralowie lads wore theirs to music festivals back in the day.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:17 pm
by marbles
zedman wrote:
marbles wrote:
morell wrote:Blue and green should never be seen.

And you're making some massive assumptions based on stuffing around with some colours of a template marbles. Just have some fun mate.


i think thats an outstanding jumper, only took 5 minutes and my opinion is bias but it would be better than 40% of the SAAFL guernseys. blue & green is fine together (NFL - sea eagles)

youd attract more juniors with this one than the one you had now and people would wear it to public events more often than current MP jumper :D


who wears their club guernsey to public events? :shock:


those who have legendary kick awesome guernseys