Page 17 of 41

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:58 pm
by carey
The Big Shrek wrote:SN not losing points for the b grader. He will suffer an internal suspension. Anyone else smell a deal being done?



Both players dealt with harshly (but needed to be from the clubs point of view). Jessen no longer at the club.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 10:09 pm
by Trader
The Big Shrek wrote:SN not losing points for the b grader. He will suffer an internal suspension. Anyone else smell a deal being done?


Clearly a deal being done, and while at first that might not sit well with some, overall I think it's a good thing.

The idea behind the threat of losing points is all about ensuring SN (and other clubs on these arrangements) do all in their power to ensure that everyone can go and play some footy without the fear of incidents we've seen in the past.

For mine, we shouldn't be out to penalise clubs (unless they refuse to deal promptly with such matters) but rather moving towards a cleaner environment for all to enjoy.

Well done to both the league and SN for acting swiftly in the best interests of both the league as a whole, and the remaining players at SN.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 11:13 am
by Footy Chick
There was no deal done. SN acted swiftly. This worked in their favour.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:47 am
by jo172
How's this one for some indecision:

Far North Football League Henley Fairclough, Sam Pending 2016-04-25


Henley Great Southern Football League (SA) Fairclough, Sam Pending 2016-04-27


What a glorious 2 days to be a Shark again?

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 10:11 am
by S Demon
jo172 wrote:How's this one for some indecision:

Far North Football League Henley Fairclough, Sam Pending 2016-04-25


Henley Great Southern Football League (SA) Fairclough, Sam Pending 2016-04-27


What a glorious 2 days to be a Shark again?

Also known as the Marcus Coxiatis syndrome

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 10:12 am
by Footy Chick
If they don't play a game, i thought they got cleared back to their previous club before being cleared out again (or something like that)

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:18 pm
by BigRig
Couple good Ins for Dizzies. M Lokan & N McDowell on the clearences

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:53 pm
by jo172
BigRig wrote:Couple good Ins for Dizzies. M Lokan & N McDowell on the clearences


How many games will Matty Lokan be available? Would have thought he'd be more likely to play reserves and teach the developing players.

Would be where you'd get your best value from a bloke in his position in my view.

No point having him play once in every 3 weeks

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:47 pm
by BigRig
jo172 wrote:
BigRig wrote:Couple good Ins for Dizzies. M Lokan & N McDowell on the clearences


How many games will Matty Lokan be available? Would have thought he'd be more likely to play reserves and teach the developing players.

Would be where you'd get your best value from a bloke in his position in my view.

No point having him play once in every 3 weeks


Think the bay's may have 7 or 8 Sunday games
Named in the 2s by the looks of things along with McDowell .

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 11:46 pm
by jo172
Obviously I have no insight into Jeremy Clayton's thinking.

I think a bloke like Lokan being able to give what he can in the B's or Cs would be invaluable for the young blokes. Trying to mesh his schedule with the A Grade would be far more trouble than he's worth. That's a stunt D4 teams pull, Dizzies are too smart for that

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:33 am
by BigRig
jo172 wrote:Obviously I have no insight into Jeremy Clayton's thinking.

I think a bloke like Lokan being able to give what he can in the B's or Cs would be invaluable for the young blokes. Trying to mesh his schedule with the A Grade would be far more trouble than he's worth. That's a stunt D4 teams pull, Dizzies are too smart for that


Comes down to weather he wants to play Agrade or just have the casual kick . The blokes only 33 so not past it by any means.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 11:31 am
by heater31
BigRig wrote:
jo172 wrote:Obviously I have no insight into Jeremy Clayton's thinking.

I think a bloke like Lokan being able to give what he can in the B's or Cs would be invaluable for the young blokes. Trying to mesh his schedule with the A Grade would be far more trouble than he's worth. That's a stunt D4 teams pull, Dizzies are too smart for that


Comes down to weather he wants to play Agrade or just have the casual kick . The blokes only 33 so not past it by any means.

Looks 53 though.....

But good smart play by Districts, Division 1 is not the place for Guest appearances. You always have a more fluid line in the 2's doesn't mater if it's Div 1 or Div 7.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 6:08 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili
PAOC beat TTG by 33 points.....should have been a bigger margin. 13 more scoring shots. Completely out worked Gullies after half time.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 9:15 pm
by Computer Crashed
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:PAOC beat TTG by 33 points.....should have been a bigger margin. 13 more scoring shots. Completely out worked Gullies after half time.

PNU spanking Goodies as well.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 9:59 pm
by jo172
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:PAOC beat TTG by 33 points.....should have been a bigger margin. 13 more scoring shots. Completely out worked Gullies after half time.


At Park 9? Big result either way.

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:50 pm
by jo172
Computer Crashed wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:PAOC beat TTG by 33 points.....should have been a bigger margin. 13 more scoring shots. Completely out worked Gullies after half time.

PNU spanking Goodies as well.


Have a look at the quarter by quarters. Very good toss to win

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:58 pm
by Eagles2014
heater31 wrote:
BigRig wrote:
jo172 wrote:Obviously I have no insight into Jeremy Clayton's thinking.

I think a bloke like Lokan being able to give what he can in the B's or Cs would be invaluable for the young blokes. Trying to mesh his schedule with the A Grade would be far more trouble than he's worth. That's a stunt D4 teams pull, Dizzies are too smart for that


Comes down to weather he wants to play Agrade or just have the casual kick . The blokes only 33 so not past it by any means.

Looks 53 though.....

But good smart play by Districts, Division 1 is not the place for Guest appearances. You always have a more fluid line in the 2's doesn't mater if it's Div 1 or Div 7.


Heard Lokan did his Hammy in first 10 minutes of the Reserves game, so may be the end of him for a while now anyway!

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2016 1:17 pm
by marbles
Dizzies drawing with ROCS is an extraordinary result :) its not a win but rocs probably season favourites and dizzies generally a finals outsider making a big statement to rest of the comp?

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2016 1:33 pm
by Jetters
Who thinks Rocs are favs???

Re: CH9AFL Division 1 2016

PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2016 1:36 pm
by marbles
Jetters wrote:Who thinks Rocs are favs???


Ahh yea woops "unley" season favourites my bad soz J 8-[