by My Free Will » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:41 am
by bubba love » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:49 am
by Dolphin Express » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:49 am
piccachu wrote:Scoreboard most certainly didnt do the game down at the Thunder dome justice,
very Physical game of footy (which surprised me a little bit)
but in the end Portland were up to the task and ran away with it,
just a quick comment on a few of CBCOC players. if number 5 doesnt get atleast 5 for king hitting the smallest bloke on the oval in the back of the head right infront of the umpire there is something wrong, and number 9 was the biggest sniper i have played against, to his credit he got away with it and what always happens was the retaliator got caught.
by Iron Fist » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:50 am
My Free Will wrote:bubba love wrote:my free will! you are an absolute nob! no wonder everyone thinks your club is full of wankas! i see your looking for a new a grade an b grade coach already! good luck finding someone stupid enough to get involved with your hole of a club!
Knob.
Bubba I believe you have to advertise for your coaching roles every year unless your current coach has a long term contract. Hole of a club in your eyes but a club rebuilding and even with our big outs this year still managed to win 4 games in div 1. Lets see how your club would go if you lost 10 or so A graders from the previous year. I would say 0 wins and relegation.
by Iron Fist » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:52 am
Dolphin Express wrote:piccachu wrote:Scoreboard most certainly didnt do the game down at the Thunder dome justice,
very Physical game of footy (which surprised me a little bit)
but in the end Portland were up to the task and ran away with it,
just a quick comment on a few of CBCOC players. if number 5 doesnt get atleast 5 for king hitting the smallest bloke on the oval in the back of the head right infront of the umpire there is something wrong, and number 9 was the biggest sniper i have played against, to his credit he got away with it and what always happens was the retaliator got caught.
number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
by piccachu » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:55 am
Knob.
Bubba I believe you have to advertise for your coaching roles every year unless your current coach has a long term contract. Hole of a club in your eyes but a club rebuilding and even with our big outs this year still managed to win 4 games in div 1. Lets see how your club would go if you lost 10 or so A graders from the previous year. I would say 0 wins and relegation.
by bubba love » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:56 am
by My Free Will » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:59 am
Iron Fist wrote:My Free Will wrote:bubba love wrote:my free will! you are an absolute nob! no wonder everyone thinks your club is full of wankas! i see your looking for a new a grade an b grade coach already! good luck finding someone stupid enough to get involved with your hole of a club!
Knob.
Bubba I believe you have to advertise for your coaching roles every year unless your current coach has a long term contract. Hole of a club in your eyes but a club rebuilding and even with our big outs this year still managed to win 4 games in div 1. Lets see how your club would go if you lost 10 or so A graders from the previous year. I would say 0 wins and relegation.
believe we lost 13 starting A graders at the end of 2005, MFW
We avoided relegation that year, something you havent been able to do and won a premiership 2 years later.
by piccachu » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:01 pm
number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
by Iron Fist » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:01 pm
My Free Will wrote:Iron Fist wrote:My Free Will wrote:bubba love wrote:my free will! you are an absolute nob! no wonder everyone thinks your club is full of wankas! i see your looking for a new a grade an b grade coach already! good luck finding someone stupid enough to get involved with your hole of a club!
Knob.
Bubba I believe you have to advertise for your coaching roles every year unless your current coach has a long term contract. Hole of a club in your eyes but a club rebuilding and even with our big outs this year still managed to win 4 games in div 1. Lets see how your club would go if you lost 10 or so A graders from the previous year. I would say 0 wins and relegation.
believe we lost 13 starting A graders at the end of 2005, MFW
We avoided relegation that year, something you havent been able to do and won a premiership 2 years later.
And i suppose you did it all without spending any money!!!!![]()
And all the players you got this year are there for the ride. They dont put there hand out saturday night at all do they!!!
by Trader » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:01 pm
by bubba love » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:03 pm
by Dolphin Express » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:16 pm
piccachu wrote:number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
so because he is small your aloud to have a 10m run up and king hit some one in the back of the head and he would have had 5 kgs at least on the bloke he belted, and what In your opinion happened for him to do such a cowardly act, someone has to tell him hes playing football and being tackled is part of footy,
by piccachu » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:22 pm
Not sure where it says any of that in my post, just says he is small and was the retaliator.
by piccachu » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Mitcham and SMOSH can both make it still, if CBC get smashed by Iggies.
I'd expect Iggies to be up and about given they could face CBC again if they lose, so a smashing could be on the cards.
Iggies over CBC by 80pts, SMOSH over Para Hills by 80pts and Mitcham to smash Kilburn by 30 goals and then you finish with CBC 6th.
Unlikely and fair to assume CBC will keep it closer, in which case it really is one of Mitcham or SMOSH.
If SMOSH can win say 71-70 over Para Hills, then Mitcham will need to win by about 100pts to get enough %. All comes down to the scores as well as the margin.
by HawkieRanger » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:47 pm
Dolphin Express wrote:piccachu wrote:Scoreboard most certainly didnt do the game down at the Thunder dome justice,
very Physical game of footy (which surprised me a little bit)
but in the end Portland were up to the task and ran away with it,
just a quick comment on a few of CBCOC players. if number 5 doesnt get atleast 5 for king hitting the smallest bloke on the oval in the back of the head right infront of the umpire there is something wrong, and number 9 was the biggest sniper i have played against, to his credit he got away with it and what always happens was the retaliator got caught.
number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
by Dolphin Express » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:51 pm
piccachu wrote:Not sure where it says any of that in my post, just says he is small and was the retaliator.
so what in your opinion did he retaliat to?
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:57 pm
HawkieRanger wrote:Dolphin Express wrote:piccachu wrote:Scoreboard most certainly didnt do the game down at the Thunder dome justice,
very Physical game of footy (which surprised me a little bit)
but in the end Portland were up to the task and ran away with it,
just a quick comment on a few of CBCOC players. if number 5 doesnt get atleast 5 for king hitting the smallest bloke on the oval in the back of the head right infront of the umpire there is something wrong, and number 9 was the biggest sniper i have played against, to his credit he got away with it and what always happens was the retaliator got caught.
number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
PAOC v Mitcham, we had the same thing. Didn't think they were TOO bad, but every now and again they'd pay an absolutely shocker that had everyone dumbfounded.
by Iron Fist » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:05 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:HawkieRanger wrote:Dolphin Express wrote:piccachu wrote:Scoreboard most certainly didnt do the game down at the Thunder dome justice,
very Physical game of footy (which surprised me a little bit)
but in the end Portland were up to the task and ran away with it,
just a quick comment on a few of CBCOC players. if number 5 doesnt get atleast 5 for king hitting the smallest bloke on the oval in the back of the head right infront of the umpire there is something wrong, and number 9 was the biggest sniper i have played against, to his credit he got away with it and what always happens was the retaliator got caught.
number 5 is pretty close to the smallest bloke in the league, and like you said, the retaliator always gets caught.
Congratulations to the SAAFL for giving us 2 15 year old girls as central umpires. That was a great idea.
PAOC v Mitcham, we had the same thing. Didn't think they were TOO bad, but every now and again they'd pay an absolutely shocker that had everyone dumbfounded.
I agree with HR but you get shockers with all umpires - are both these girls academy umpires?
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:15 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |