SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

[Iron Fist]

Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????

The player in question is a Port Adelaide Magpies player first and foremost. He signed a contract at the start of the season, saying he is with the Port Magpies.
There are some strict guidelines in regards to training sessions (including recovery sessions). If you miss them and there is no real reason then you can expect to be penalised.
The player you are referring to is very talented, but would admit himself that he has done the wrong thing.
Its also not the first time this player has done it this season.
There is also another gifted player who will probably be drafted at seasons end in the same boat this weekend.
The rule is the same for all players. All very well to be talented, but you also need to be disciplined and commited as well.

What is his home club?? (SAAFL side)

[HawkieRanger]

Portland v Old Ignatians - Old Iggies in a close one if they're at full strength
Seaton Ramblers v Kilburn - Hoping for a Kilburn win, but can't see it happening
Mitcham v Prince Alfred OC - Have to back your own side no matter who the opposition
CBCOC v SMOSH West Lakes - Need SMOSH to lose the rest of their games, so go CBCOC!
Para Hills v Scotch OC - Think they might suprise PH, should be a good contest.

[the star]

big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.

[schimma]

Old iggies to beat Portland in a match of the round classic. down to the wire. height of steven white to win the game for iggies
Seaton to boost its percentage against kilburn.
Paoc to beat mitcham by 15+ goals
Cbcoc to beat smosh. smosh never win on the day of there ball
Para Hills to win easily and kill off scotch

[FRED]

big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.

What grade will he play?

[SATCHEL]

Portland v Old Ignatians close one our boys by 2-3 goals
Seaton Ramblers v Kilburn not a walk in the park but a certain win.
Mitcham v Prince Alfred OC 100+ points
CBCOC v SMOSH West Lakes 4-6 Goals
Para Hills v Scotch OC Going to be a belting. PH deserve better than where they are

[teaoby]

Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????

The player in question is a Port Adelaide Magpies player first and foremost. He signed a contract at the start of the season, saying he is with the Port Magpies.
There are some strict guidelines in regards to training sessions (including recovery sessions). If you miss them and there is no real reason then you can expect to be penalised.
The player you are referring to is very talented, but would admit himself that he has done the wrong thing.
Its also not the first time this player has done it this season.
There is also another gifted player who will probably be drafted at seasons end in the same boat this weekend.
The rule is the same for all players. All very well to be talented, but you also need to be disciplined and commited as well.

very well said. dunno who the kid is but, ultimatly as you have said you have a contract with the SANFL club and they control your future. so dont give them reason to mess with said future!

[grandmastasexay]

its actually not about us were talking about PAOC.
and the rest of us are sick of you whinging about umpires so i might create a thread for you and your side kick so you stick to that.

Show me where i'm whinging about umpires, havn't spoken about the maggots for a long time.
1 or 2 posts of constructive criticism aint whinging, its better than the sh!t you blokes talk.
I've read more slagging of umpires from you & your bafoons so don't start pointing the finger this way.

No Mercy lets talk about the likelyhood of your players sticking around next year!!!!!

As for you MFW, I'd be more worried about your own side before throwing stones champ, last year was only a start as to the players your gonna lose at the end of this year.

well well well mfw

[blackcat]

[quote="the star"]big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.[/quote

I might pull the boots on myself if Beery can make a comeback.

[the wizard]

big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.[/quote

I might pull the boots on myself if Beery can make a comeback.

i might to and ive been retired for 20 years

[cokadonkeytoo]

big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.[/quote

I might pull the boots on myself if Beery can make a comeback.

i might to and ive been retired for 20 years

he better not take the only 3XL guernsey otherwise i wont have a guernsey to wear

[hanno_7]

big news out of para hills coach darren beer is coming out of retirement for the last few games, showed he could still mix it last night. he wore all black to training unfortunately the desired effect of slimming didnt really portray its self, we also thought he had gone out and bought some skins for training but at closer inspection turns out they were some trackpants from his fulltime playing days.

he better not take the only 3XL guernsey otherwise i wont have a guernsey to wear

was that beery last night in the black?
i thought the boat had made the a grade squad

[NO-MERCY]

Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????

The player in question is a Port Adelaide Magpies player first and foremost. He signed a contract at the start of the season, saying he is with the Port Magpies.
There are some strict guidelines in regards to training sessions (including recovery sessions). If you miss them and there is no real reason then you can expect to be penalised.
The player you are referring to is very talented, but would admit himself that he has done the wrong thing.
Its also not the first time this player has done it this season.
There is also another gifted player who will probably be drafted at seasons end in the same boat this weekend.
The rule is the same for all players. All very well to be talented, but you also need to be disciplined and commited as well.

I'm all for TEAM RULES & DISCIPLINES & i understand the lads signed with Port Magpies.
I also understand that all players are told to allign themselves with an SAAFL Club for obvious reasons ( being dropped, disciplined, lack of form etc )
This lad was dropped twice for the same reason earlier in the year yet was told to go back to his Amateur Club & play.
Why was he allowed then but not now? Has it got to do with the 4 game qualifying rule put in place & the SAAFL club involved?
In saying that he had 2 games under his belt with his Amateur League Club prior to the bye last week of the SANFL.
His SANFL coach told him he can't play the week of the Port bye & the following week with his Amateur Club which would of given him the 4 games to qualify if in need for finals ( if not required by Port of course )
The lads Amateur League coach questioned the reason with his SANFL Club for him not being allowed to play the week of the bye as he thought it was in the best interest of both party's for form & confidence to play, the club agreed & let him play.
That gave him 3 games & now his SANFL Club have done a complete backflip on it, so he can't qualify by playing his 4th game this week.
I wonder what the real reason is???
I bet if he was alligned to Port Districts or Portland things would of been completely different.

[barry_watson]

Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????

The player in question is a Port Adelaide Magpies player first and foremost. He signed a contract at the start of the season, saying he is with the Port Magpies.
There are some strict guidelines in regards to training sessions (including recovery sessions). If you miss them and there is no real reason then you can expect to be penalised.
The player you are referring to is very talented, but would admit himself that he has done the wrong thing.
Its also not the first time this player has done it this season.
There is also another gifted player who will probably be drafted at seasons end in the same boat this weekend.
The rule is the same for all players. All very well to be talented, but you also need to be disciplined and commited as well.

I'm all for TEAM RULES & DISCIPLINES & i understand the lads signed with Port Magpies.
I also understand that all players are told to allign themselves with an SAAFL Club for obvious reasons ( being dropped, disciplined, lack of form etc )
This lad was dropped twice for the same reason earlier in the year yet was told to go back to his Amateur Club & play.
Why was he allowed then but not now? Has it got to do with the 4 game qualifying rule put in place & the SAAFL club involved?
In saying that he had 2 games under his belt with his Amateur League Club prior to the bye last week of the SANFL.
His SANFL coach told him he can't play the week of the Port bye & the following week with his Amateur Club which would of given him the 4 games to qualify if in need for finals ( if not required by Port of course )
The lads Amateur League coach questioned the reason with his SANFL Club for him not being allowed to play the week of the bye as he thought it was in the best interest of both party's for form & confidence to play, the club agreed & let him play.
That gave him 3 games & now his SANFL Club have done a complete backflip on it, so he can't qualify by playing his 4th game this week.
I wonder what the real reason is???
I bet if he was alligned to Port Districts or Portland things would of been completely different.

Port magpies hate there players going to portland. They always said they wanted there players to play for a div 1 side yet when port districts have been in div 2 they still say to go there.
Who is the player you are talking about and what ameture team does he play for?

[Trader]

So he played SAAFL A's last week and the SANFL coach wants him to be rested this week.
Easy, name him on the SAAFL B's bench this week, and just play with a reduced bench.

He gets his 4th game, and he doesn't play keeping the SANFL club happy.

[Hellboy]

Name him in the Cs or Ds

your allowed 200 interchange players

[Demon Juke]

So he played SAAFL A's last week and the SANFL coach wants him to be rested this week.
Easy, name him on the SAAFL B's bench this week, and just play with a reduced bench.

He gets his 4th game, and he doesn't play keeping the SANFL club happy.

You need a permit for a player to come back for a bye round and that round doesn't count towards qualifying for the finals.

[Sturtman]

Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????

The player in question is a Port Adelaide Magpies player first and foremost. He signed a contract at the start of the season, saying he is with the Port Magpies.
There are some strict guidelines in regards to training sessions (including recovery sessions). If you miss them and there is no real reason then you can expect to be penalised.
The player you are referring to is very talented, but would admit himself that he has done the wrong thing.
Its also not the first time this player has done it this season.
There is also another gifted player who will probably be drafted at seasons end in the same boat this weekend.
The rule is the same for all players. All very well to be talented, but you also need to be disciplined and commited as well.

I'm all for TEAM RULES & DISCIPLINES & i understand the lads signed with Port Magpies.
I also understand that all players are told to allign themselves with an SAAFL Club for obvious reasons ( being dropped, disciplined, lack of form etc )
This lad was dropped twice for the same reason earlier in the year yet was told to go back to his Amateur Club & play.
Why was he allowed then but not now? Has it got to do with the 4 game qualifying rule put in place & the SAAFL club involved?
In saying that he had 2 games under his belt with his Amateur League Club prior to the bye last week of the SANFL.
His SANFL coach told him he can't play the week of the Port bye & the following week with his Amateur Club which would of given him the 4 games to qualify if in need for finals ( if not required by Port of course )
The lads Amateur League coach questioned the reason with his SANFL Club for him not being allowed to play the week of the bye as he thought it was in the best interest of both party's for form & confidence to play, the club agreed & let him play.
That gave him 3 games & now his SANFL Club have done a complete backflip on it, so he can't qualify by playing his 4th game this week.
I wonder what the real reason is???
I bet if he was alligned to Port Districts or Portland things would of been completely different.

Port magpies hate there players going to portland. They always said they wanted there players to play for a div 1 side yet when port districts have been in div 2 they still say to go there.
Who is the player you are talking about and what ameture team does he play for?

Obviously he plays for Seaton in SAAFL, this is why No Mercy cares so much. I think you will find the whole team was told to have a rest the week Port had the bye, not just the player in question. Its just another conspiracy agains No Mercy, first it was the umpires, then the SAAFL and now the coach of Port u/18's

[carey]

Portland v Old Ignatians close one our boys by 2-3 goals
Seaton Ramblers v Kilburn not a walk in the park but a certain win.
Mitcham v Prince Alfred OC 100+ points
CBCOC v SMOSH West Lakes 4-6 Goals
Para Hills v Scotch OC Going to be a belting. PH deserve better than where they are

portland by 18
seaton by 82
paoc by 116
cbcoc by 32
para hills by 40

[NO-MERCY]

Obviously he plays for Seaton in SAAFL, this is why No Mercy cares so much. I think you will find the whole team was told to have a rest the week Port had the bye, not just the player in question. Its just another conspiracy agains No Mercy, first it was the umpires, then the SAAFL and now the coach of Port u/18's

Its all good for you Sturtman understandably as the Port Magpies 18s coach is a Portland boy........
I do care, why shouldn't i ? i do look at the best interest of the lad involved & our club for your information, if i didn't i wouldn't be doing my job would i?
You think the whole team was told to have a rest, well you talk out your ar$e, if that was the case we would of been told that directly from Port when we phoned them but wasn't.
Instead of trying to be a smart ar$e Sturtman get your facts right, i have alot of contacts at Port, that doesn't mean i expect any favours. ( just honesty & thought for the player involved, ( maintain his confidence not lose it )
Why tell a player to allign himself with an Amateur Club when he's not going to be sent back there? ( waste of time, just miss a week or 2 & find your attitude & form on the training track )

As far as the conspiracy your on about Sturtman have you heard about the one involving the Director of umpires against our coach?
Evidence has been supplied by 3 umpires & its in the hands of an SAAFL deligate, it will be handed over to the SANFL very soon if theirs no satisfactory outcome, our coaches patience is running out with the SAAFL.
Watch this space.