SA Footy

Danky$$ wrote:
#10

Gee that #1 for Kilburn moves like a gazelle.

Danky$$ wrote:SMOSH sending in footage to the league and getting a Kilburn player reported for an " apparent strike " that was nothing more than a tackle is poor! what's peoples thoughts on these? i am all for it if its an ugly incident or a punch but when the umpire was right there and called play on its a joke!

Gee, nothing to see there. Not even sure it was a free kick

Happy Bday Shred!!!

Thank you very much Mayor Fist

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

Danky$$ wrote:SMOSH sending in footage to the league and getting a Kilburn player reported for an " apparent strike " that was nothing more than a tackle is poor! what's peoples thoughts on these? i am all for it if its an ugly incident or a punch but when the umpire was right there and called play on its a joke!

Gee, nothing to see there. Not even sure it was a free kick

2 weeks wtf.

I’ve still got a fat lip and a sore throat from copping two stray arms in the same match. I might go through the video and try and rub a couple of them out. The bloke who got the high tackle got straight up and was mouthing off so can’t have been hurt too bad.

Not sure we want to create an atmosphere where teams look to dob each other in for anything that looks remotely reportable on video. You also have to remember that sometimes video footage can be deceiving depending on the angles and the stuff we get obviously isn’t AFL type quality.

The Big Shrek wrote:Not sure we want to create an atmosphere where teams look to dob each other in for anything that looks remotely reportable on video.

Preach it my brother!

The Big Shrek wrote:I’ve still got a fat lip and a sore throat from copping two stray arms in the same match. I might go through the video and try and rub a couple of them out. The bloke who got the high tackle got straight up and was mouthing off so can’t have been hurt too bad.

Not sure we want to create an atmosphere where teams look to dob each other in for anything that looks remotely reportable on video. You also have to remember that sometimes video footage can be deceiving depending on the angles and the stuff we get obviously isn’t AFL type quality.

True you don't want teams looking for stray arms etc but surely there is no issue in the CU case if they were to look for that one which was clearly not just a stray arm.

Massive difference and in 99% of the cases pretty obvious as to whether it is a violent act or just a football act gone wrong.

Only lawyers complicate the matter.

Agreed, I don't believe in clubs 'dobbing' to the tribunal which seems to have happened a couple of times this season. Blokes have received weeks when the umpire hasn't handed out a card....or even a free kick. If its off the ball or a violent act that are missed its a different story, otherwise play on

The Big Shrek wrote:I’ve still got a fat lip and a sore throat from copping two stray arms in the same match because I'm a mouthy shit

EFA

That doesn't count

Yeah not a good look on my club if they did this. Woody South did the dodgy on us earlier. Not sure why the club would decide to go down to that level. Have not heard about what happened. so very uneducated in the reason behind it.

Casting the first stone in these circumstances seems a courageous move by SMOSH.

You'd think they'd want to be very squeaky clean going forward.

jo172 wrote:Casting the first stone in these circumstances seems a courageous move by SMOSH.

You'd think they'd want to be very squeaky clean going forward.

What was the outcome? Did Smosh West Lakes cite the Kilburn player and if so what was the result at the tribunal?

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

jo172 wrote:Casting the first stone in these circumstances seems a courageous move by SMOSH.

You'd think they'd want to be very squeaky clean going forward.

What was the outcome? Did Smosh West Lakes cite the Kilburn player and if so what was the result at the tribunal?

2 games is what I'm reading.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

jo172 wrote:Casting the first stone in these circumstances seems a courageous move by SMOSH.

You'd think they'd want to be very squeaky clean going forward.

What was the outcome? Did Smosh West Lakes cite the Kilburn player and if so what was the result at the tribunal?

2 games is what I'm reading.

SMOSH did it and the player has received 2 games with an extra match suspended. horrible outcome, if anyone knows Jason he is the last person to do anything illegal on the field, i hope the remaining teams that play SMOSH dont try and tackle them to hard!

Danky$$ wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

jo172 wrote:Casting the first stone in these circumstances seems a courageous move by SMOSH.

You'd think they'd want to be very squeaky clean going forward.

What was the outcome? Did Smosh West Lakes cite the Kilburn player and if so what was the result at the tribunal?

2 games is what I'm reading.

SMOSH did it and the player has received 2 games with an extra match suspended. horrible outcome, if anyone knows Jason he is the last person to do anything illegal on the field, i hope the remaining teams that play SMOSH dont try and tackle them to hard!

That is outrageous.

Going to be a very interesting finals campaign this year with the flag realistically being winnable from any team in the 5.
Can anyone get a good read on Woody South at the moment. Great against the top teams but have seriously dropped the ball against the bottom 5. The Table below shows how the top 5 have all fared against each other this year.

...............................W....L.......For..Against..Percentage
Woodville South...4.....1......412.....343......54.57%
SMOSH..................4.....2......471.....465......50.32%
CBC........................3.....3......428.....356......54.59%
Edwardstown.......3.....5.......689.....698.....49.68%
Mitcham................1.....5.......456.....594.....43.43%

Can Kilburn sneak into the 5 which would be a fair effort considered they were down in 9th after rd 10. If WS can hold form against the top sides it could be Mitcham who drops out considering they play both WS and Kilburn in the last 4 games as well as a red hot CBC.
Rd 18 Mitcham vs Kilburn and WS vs SMOSH results will probably determine 4th and 5th place.

CBC starting to flex

scottroo wrote:CBC starting to flex

If they beat Smosh they will finish top. They have some serious talent in that team and are hard to match up on. I think Woody Sth should hold on to 5th spot with what I saw on Saturday. Lochie Barreau is starting to fit in nicely after a few div 1 games for Henley earlier this year. Daniel Lees is a handy late June inclusion, it’s not so much what he does personally but his experience in teaching the young ones is invaluable to them. If his body holds together he will be hard to handle in finals. Edwardstown and Mitcham are struggling a bit at the wrong end of the season. It certainly is going to be a big 4 weeks for all teams.

Robb_Stark wrote:

carey wrote:

Robb_Stark wrote: Pooraka will be top 3 team

My bet is a box of West End they don’t finish top 3. Over to you Sir. Money where your mouth is

yeah why not

May as well pay up now Stark