by Dogwatcher » Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:17 pm
by smac » Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:24 pm
by Felch » Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:25 pm
by Northside Fraud » Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:27 pm
by smac » Thu Sep 06, 2007 12:35 pm
by bulldogs » Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:08 pm
smac wrote:I just read what I wrote and it came out poorly - what I meant was that him being fat and slow will not change the game as he has been that for years. Reads the play better than any at that level and has plenty of impact on the game because of it.
I'm fairly certain he knows that he's fat and slow.
by bulldogs » Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:10 pm
yeva wrote:bulldogs wrote:this area gone very quiet. im tipping mitcham to get over salisbury, as long as couzner is in the guts when the weather is hot salisbury to struggle. he looked way off it in the 2nd half against para hill from what i watched, was getting to the contest when the ball was gone to fat to slow, likes to suck off and go forward waiting for it to be dished out to him.
your backing mitcham and the back of one bloke no playing well in the centre??????????
by smac » Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:17 pm
bulldogs wrote:smac wrote:I just read what I wrote and it came out poorly - what I meant was that him being fat and slow will not change the game as he has been that for years. Reads the play better than any at that level and has plenty of impact on the game because of it.
I'm fairly certain he knows that he's fat and slow.
your right he has been but in finals pretty hard to get away with.someone just has to man up on him and he is gone because he is a receiver. was terrible from the 2nd half that i watched.
by Felch » Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:20 pm
by yeva » Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:31 pm
bulldogs wrote:smac wrote:I just read what I wrote and it came out poorly - what I meant was that him being fat and slow will not change the game as he has been that for years. Reads the play better than any at that level and has plenty of impact on the game because of it.
I'm fairly certain he knows that he's fat and slow.
your right he has been but in finals pretty hard to get away with.someone just has to man up on him and he is gone because he is a receiver. was terrible from the 2nd half that i watched.
by beeroclock » Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:20 pm
by Pag » Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:35 pm
beeroclock wrote:Salisbury cannot beat Para Hills,when you have the luxury of putting your gun full forward into the middle in the second half and him turning the game like he did then things are looking good for ya.Para Hills seemed to handle the pressure of being down by 4 goal at hlf time very well,Salisbury were out of gas big time, only Mitcham have a chance in fine conditions.
by Felch » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:57 am
by beeroclock » Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:34 pm
by bulldogs » Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:46 pm
yeva wrote:bulldogs wrote:smac wrote:I just read what I wrote and it came out poorly - what I meant was that him being fat and slow will not change the game as he has been that for years. Reads the play better than any at that level and has plenty of impact on the game because of it.
I'm fairly certain he knows that he's fat and slow.
your right he has been but in finals pretty hard to get away with.someone just has to man up on him and he is gone because he is a receiver. was terrible from the 2nd half that i watched.
bulldogs, a fair call with the fact it's hard to get away with in finals and the man up factor but have disagree with the fact he's a receiver, more often than not he's doing his fair share of work in and under packs.
i do agree with you comment on him in the second half of last weeks game, terrible doesnt come to mind as he still did some work but run out of steem would be closer to the mark and para hills on ballers were very good.
by heater31 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:21 pm
bulldogs wrote:What about farmers c4 team. Mitcham video taped the game and sent it into the league and 4 reports were layed from it. Mesecke club legend gets 5games another bloke 5 the captain all of next year and coach already got 1 game and not sure what he got from video. Farmers need to look seriously at pissing a few blokes off from there club all the hard work that was done to clean up there reputation has fallen by the wayside this year with there weak effort in the A-grade and half a dozen blokes around the club that cant control themselves
by bulldogs » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:00 pm
by smac » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:51 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |