you cant play for Portland and not have a record can youIron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:and u saying that felch, i pressume that u have a clean record.??
of course he does
cleanest bloke to ever play for portland![]()
by the joker » Thu May 29, 2008 1:18 pm
you cant play for Portland and not have a record can youIron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:and u saying that felch, i pressume that u have a clean record.??
of course he does
cleanest bloke to ever play for portland![]()
by Felch » Thu May 29, 2008 1:20 pm
the joker wrote:you cant play for Portland and not have a record can youIron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:and u saying that felch, i pressume that u have a clean record.??
of course he does
cleanest bloke to ever play for portland![]()
by amber_fluid » Thu May 29, 2008 1:22 pm
the joker wrote:you cant play for Portland and not have a record can youIron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:and u saying that felch, i pressume that u have a clean record.??
of course he does
cleanest bloke to ever play for portland![]()
by Felch » Thu May 29, 2008 1:29 pm
amber_fluid wrote:the joker wrote:you cant play for Portland and not have a record can youIron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:and u saying that felch, i pressume that u have a clean record.??
of course he does
cleanest bloke to ever play for portland![]()
are we talking tribunal records or criminal records? Probably both at Portland!!!
by amber_fluid » Thu May 29, 2008 1:33 pm
by Felch » Thu May 29, 2008 3:07 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu May 29, 2008 3:19 pm
by piccachu » Thu May 29, 2008 4:00 pm
by Punk Rooster » Thu May 29, 2008 4:13 pm
Fitzroy Billiard Tablepiccachu wrote:were is the mitcham vs fitzroy game being played. if at fitzroy they will win if not mitcham
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by piccachu » Thu May 29, 2008 4:15 pm
by mr.moody » Thu May 29, 2008 4:26 pm
by Iron Fist » Thu May 29, 2008 4:38 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu May 29, 2008 4:48 pm
by barry_watson » Thu May 29, 2008 4:53 pm
by Felch » Thu May 29, 2008 4:54 pm
amber_fluid wrote:does anyone other than the Haven boys give them a chance?
by amber_fluid » Thu May 29, 2008 4:58 pm
Felch wrote:amber_fluid wrote:does anyone other than the Haven boys give them a chance?
They have a chance, Pooraka's forward line will be hard to stop though. Losing Forrest doesnt help either. Who will kick the goals ?
by piccachu » Thu May 29, 2008 5:15 pm
by Felch » Thu May 29, 2008 5:22 pm
piccachu wrote:well i think they should rush young tom lipson back. Early in the season while playing along side forrest
didnt take any responsibility as he was second option but i think if he is the focal point of the forward line he has the potential to stand up in a big game and also matt hood went up to full forward with forrest off for the rest of the game last week and led well so i dont think there short of options.
by Iron Fist » Thu May 29, 2008 5:32 pm
Felch wrote:piccachu wrote:well i think they should rush young tom lipson back. Early in the season while playing along side forrest
didnt take any responsibility as he was second option but i think if he is the focal point of the forward line he has the potential to stand up in a big game and also matt hood went up to full forward with forrest off for the rest of the game last week and led well so i dont think there short of options.
Big ask of the kid to be the focal point though, especially if he isnt 100%. Duerden kicked a few last week, so maybe he is an option - if he isnt needed to do a job on one of Pooraka's forwards that is.
by the joker » Thu May 29, 2008 5:55 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |