by Dogwatcher » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:18 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:32 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Well, your pretty much on your own in thinking that it's acceptable. And the SAAFL's pretty much on its own in allowing this.
by hotpies » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:49 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Well, your pretty much on your own in thinking that it's acceptable. And the SAAFL's pretty much on its own in allowing this.
no he's not... i couldnt care less. happened to our c's last saturday against kilburn... i used to do it... if it didnt affect the result would you care??? as jabber said i'd rather the side i play in play with a full quota. and also if it helped me win even better.
by Jabber » Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:59 pm
hotpies wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Well, your pretty much on your own in thinking that it's acceptable. And the SAAFL's pretty much on its own in allowing this.
no he's not... i couldnt care less. happened to our c's last saturday against kilburn... i used to do it... if it didnt affect the result would you care??? as jabber said i'd rather the side i play in play with a full quota. and also if it helped me win even better.
Totally agree with Dogwatcher, if you want to get your team thru the season pulling stunts like that what are u going to do come finals? League is weak in letting it happen. Can't do it in finals,y now?
by Jabber » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:03 pm
Jabber wrote:hotpies wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Well, your pretty much on your own in thinking that it's acceptable. And the SAAFL's pretty much on its own in allowing this.
no he's not... i couldnt care less. happened to our c's last saturday against kilburn... i used to do it... if it didnt affect the result would you care??? as jabber said i'd rather the side i play in play with a full quota. and also if it helped me win even better.
Totally agree with Dogwatcher, if you want to get your team thru the season pulling stunts like that what are u going to do come finals? League is weak in letting it happen. Can't do it in finals,y now?
When I did it we never played finals, we werent that good but I just came back, as others did, to help out a bunch of blokes that were struggling.
Is that a stunt?
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:22 pm
Jabber wrote:Maybe in actual fact it's a sign of a club with a strong ethos, that the first thing that was mentioned after the coach had finished his post game was from a group of players trying to organize a car of players to go back and help out another group of guys from their own club?
Is that a stunt?
Sometimes it's not all about playing finals, of being the best, or any of that crap. Sometimes it's just about a bunch of blokes with their club at heart that want to help out.
by hotpies » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:23 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:33 pm
hotpies wrote:A club with strong ethos mate would have the numbers and not rely on guys playing two games in a day to get a team thru
by Jabber » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:36 pm
hotpies wrote:A club with strong ethos mate would have the numbers and not rely on guys playing two games in a day to get a team thru
by Bluedemon » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:19 am
by Jabber » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:23 am
Bluedemon wrote:sometimes you do have a few B graders who are happy to help out mates and the club on a day by playing in 2 games, can help the opposition out by playing a game instead of forfeiting.
by hotpies » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:27 am
Jabber wrote:Bluedemon wrote:sometimes you do have a few B graders who are happy to help out mates and the club on a day by playing in 2 games, can help the opposition out by playing a game instead of forfeiting.
Naaah, its just a stunt
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:38 am
hotpies wrote:Jabber wrote:Bluedemon wrote:sometimes you do have a few B graders who are happy to help out mates and the club on a day by playing in 2 games, can help the opposition out by playing a game instead of forfeiting.
Naaah, its just a stunt
Y be a smartarse mate, u have rocks in your head if u think 4 or 5 B grade players playing in the C grade doesn't make a difference even if they have already played a game or not.
Shouldn't you be worrying about where your next investigation is coming from!
by BenchedEagle » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:04 am
by hotpies » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:09 am
duncs wrote:On the odd occaison when the C grade are barely fielding a side i dont mind them gettin a couple down to complete there side.
But i dont like if there is 22 C graders starting and a couple B graders come down to 'strengthen' their side. And im sure the unlocky bottom couple C graders who get pushed to the bench for blokes playin their 2nd game dont like it more than me....
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:24 am
by Jabber » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:55 am
woodublieve12 wrote:yeah cause tribunals never get it wrong!!!! Blatent elbow.. saw it!!!!
Duncs, no c grader should ever be pushed aside and nor should a b grader be used if the c's have more then 19 c graders... if side is short fair game imo...
by Jabber » Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:18 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:03 pm
by Jabber » Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:39 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:With all this talk of fairness ect where is the common sence here? Its C grade footy Ffs, I laugh @ bad umpiring decisions and if my team mate f**** up. If you want to start playing or coaching for sheep stations then ply yourself in higher grades. Be greatful there is a social footy comp.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |