
by turk186 » Wed May 09, 2012 10:18 pm
by kickinit » Wed May 09, 2012 10:38 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Kickinit, still would have thrashed you muppets no matter the points situation.
by Yank Man » Wed May 09, 2012 10:40 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Its only a stupid poll because everyone knows that they do.. its like a prostitute saying she is virgin
She lied to me?
Im sorry to break it to you Jimmy.. and she wasnt truthfull either when she said you were amazing and so big!![]()
.. dont worry i've been caught out before on these lies lol
by The Big Shrek » Wed May 09, 2012 10:40 pm
On1Leg wrote:Yank Man wrote:If clubs in Div 4 play ridiculous money, do we care? Uni are trying to get back in Div 1. You do not go there without paying.
I find it laughable that narrow minded people have this opinion. It’s just a reflection of your own club’s values. Clubs like SHOC and Uni probably could pay players, but choose not to. Don’t want to. They’d rather play in D2,3,4 or wherever, rather than compromise this fact. I know past and present players and board members at both clubs and they are proud that players play for the sake of playing. Imagine that?! As it happens, both clubs have recently lost a number of players to the lure of the country footy $$. Clubs like yours Shrek will always have a chip on their shoulder because the only way to win a flag is by spending big. This dates back to the days when the SAAFL was meant to be amateur and everyone knew of the ridiculous money spent to get players to Lionel Ave. So what happened when the well ran dry? What a slide! So now as you climb back up, a new rule has come in to stop clubs buying premierships and oops – you cry, “We made a mistake!” Unlike the previous ‘amateur’ and then ‘salary cap’ rules, this one can’t be hidden under the table.
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed May 09, 2012 11:18 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Its only a stupid poll because everyone knows that they do.. its like a prostitute saying she is virgin
She lied to me?
Im sorry to break it to you Jimmy.. and she wasnt truthfull either when she said you were amazing and so big!![]()
.. dont worry i've been caught out before on these lies lol
She did say I was bigger than you though
by X Runna » Wed May 09, 2012 11:55 pm
On1Leg wrote:Yank Man wrote:If clubs in Div 4 play ridiculous money, do we care? Uni are trying to get back in Div 1. You do not go there without paying.
I find it laughable that narrow minded people have this opinion. It’s just a reflection of your own club’s values. Clubs like SHOC and Uni probably could pay players, but choose not to. Don’t want to. They’d rather play in D2,3,4 or wherever, rather than compromise this fact. I know past and present players and board members at both clubs and they are proud that players play for the sake of playing. Imagine that?! As it happens, both clubs have recently lost a number of players to the lure of the country footy $$. Clubs like yours Shrek will always have a chip on their shoulder because the only way to win a flag is by spending big. This dates back to the days when the SAAFL was meant to be amateur and everyone knew of the ridiculous money spent to get players to Lionel Ave. So what happened when the well ran dry? What a slide! So now as you climb back up, a new rule has come in to stop clubs buying premierships and oops – you cry, “We made a mistake!” Unlike the previous ‘amateur’ and then ‘salary cap’ rules, this one can’t be hidden under the table.
by woodublieve12 » Thu May 10, 2012 12:03 am
by kickinit » Thu May 10, 2012 1:16 am
X Runna wrote:On1Leg wrote:Yank Man wrote:If clubs in Div 4 play ridiculous money, do we care? Uni are trying to get back in Div 1. You do not go there without paying.
I find it laughable that narrow minded people have this opinion. It’s just a reflection of your own club’s values. Clubs like SHOC and Uni probably could pay players, but choose not to. Don’t want to. They’d rather play in D2,3,4 or wherever, rather than compromise this fact. I know past and present players and board members at both clubs and they are proud that players play for the sake of playing. Imagine that?! As it happens, both clubs have recently lost a number of players to the lure of the country footy $$. Clubs like yours Shrek will always have a chip on their shoulder because the only way to win a flag is by spending big. This dates back to the days when the SAAFL was meant to be amateur and everyone knew of the ridiculous money spent to get players to Lionel Ave. So what happened when the well ran dry? What a slide! So now as you climb back up, a new rule has come in to stop clubs buying premierships and oops – you cry, “We made a mistake!” Unlike the previous ‘amateur’ and then ‘salary cap’ rules, this one can’t be hidden under the table.
Absolute GOLD!
by Dols » Thu May 10, 2012 9:24 am
by RRR » Thu May 10, 2012 10:26 am
Yank Man wrote:If clubs in Div 4 play ridiculous money, do we care? Uni are trying to get back in Div 1. You do not go there without paying.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Thu May 10, 2012 12:10 pm
RRR wrote:Yank Man wrote:If clubs in Div 4 play ridiculous money, do we care? Uni are trying to get back in Div 1. You do not go there without paying.
Untrue, shocs never paid and played in 2 Div 1 GFs and lost last years by a kick. It can be done, players have to play for the right reasons.
by teaoby » Thu May 10, 2012 2:22 pm
by Choccies » Thu May 10, 2012 3:25 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |