
by Choccies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:29 pm
by optimus prime » Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:19 am
grumpy1 wrote:Dont know about a weak Div 4 Choccies ... as I recall the Grovers had a couple of close calls during the finals against Greenies with a total margin of about 7points over the 2 games
1 straight kick and you guys would still be in the weak division ...Unley and Salisbury might not agree with you either![]()
by turk186 » Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:47 am
optimus prime wrote:grumpy1 wrote:Dont know about a weak Div 4 Choccies ... as I recall the Grovers had a couple of close calls during the finals against Greenies with a total margin of about 7points over the 2 games
1 straight kick and you guys would still be in the weak division ...Unley and Salisbury might not agree with you either![]()
wow - u must have been grumpy to create an account just for this post![]()
i honestly think that Div 4 was weaker last year than it was the year before. 2009 and 2010 we had basically the same team and we missed the finals in 2009 so i think choccies makes a fair point. it was definately a weaker division in 2010 compared to the year before!
by optimus prime » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:55 am
turk186 wrote:optimus prime wrote:wow - u must have been grumpy to create an account just for this post![]()
i honestly think that Div 4 was weaker last year than it was the year before. 2009 and 2010 we had basically the same team and we missed the finals in 2009 so i think choccies makes a fair point. it was definately a weaker division in 2010 compared to the year before!
It seems to me that if you guys make finals its a weak division in your collective opinion ... but if you dont its a strong division ... nice to have confidence but a little demeaning to other clubs in the division dont you think..was 2009 also your first year in div 4 after promotion from div 5 ? maybe thats a contributing factor as to why you found it hard ...same as going from div 4 to div 3 and it has nothing to do with a div being weak just lower .. hence the promotion and relegation system that works really well for the SAAFL.
Still good to see that you back each other up both on and off the field.... well played
Hows Weaver fitting in after a couple of season ?? would he stay and or get re-appointed IF you did get relegated ? the fact that you lost a lot of players from 2010 to 2011 has not helped ...do you think you would loose more if you happened to get relegated ???
by Choccies » Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:42 pm
by S Demon » Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:50 pm
by Choccies » Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:55 pm
by turk186 » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:14 am
by Choccies » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:07 pm
by laser » Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:36 pm
by SATCHEL » Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:46 pm
by NO-MERCY » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:12 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Good to see the league has really stepped up with the hearing that happen or lack there of each week. One player has his hearing suspended because the ump doesnt show up and is not allowed to play until it is heard then gets a week as part of his hearing. That players misses 2 weeks when his suspension is held up as 1 week.
Then One of our lads gets to the tribunal waits an hour and a half for the ump to get thjere and the clown doesnt show. Luckily there is a break this week but then again he might get to his hearing and get a week or more seeing that he is trying to fight the fact that he was trying to protect himself. Unless they are rediculous and/or serious reports if the umps cant be bothered to show up or even call the league to say they cant make it, the reports should be thrown out. Pure and simple.
The hireachy at the SAAFL and the umps demand this so called respect and look at what they do. The umps we had on the weekend were so called SANFL umpires. I'd hate to be those guys with what they dished out last week deliver the same types of calls at Centrals or a Magpies games for that matter. They would get torn 4 new ones let alone just one new one.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:17 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Good to see the league has really stepped up with the hearing that happen or lack there of each week. One player has his hearing suspended because the ump doesnt show up and is not allowed to play until it is heard then gets a week as part of his hearing. That players misses 2 weeks when his suspension is held up as 1 week.
Then One of our lads gets to the tribunal waits an hour and a half for the ump to get thjere and the clown doesnt show. Luckily there is a break this week but then again he might get to his hearing and get a week or more seeing that he is trying to fight the fact that he was trying to protect himself. Unless they are rediculous and/or serious reports if the umps cant be bothered to show up or even call the league to say they cant make it, the reports should be thrown out. Pure and simple.
The hireachy at the SAAFL and the umps demand this so called respect and look at what they do. The umps we had on the weekend were so called SANFL umpires. I'd hate to be those guys with what they dished out last week deliver the same types of calls at Centrals or a Magpies games for that matter. They would get torn 4 new ones let alone just one new one.
by Choccies » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:25 pm
laser wrote:Choccies, D4 could well have been weaker in 2010, but as an outsider looking in at GG, I reckon you guys improved heaps from 2009 to 2010 as well.
by Footy Smart » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:31 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Good to see the league has really stepped up with the hearing that happen or lack there of each week. One player has his hearing suspended because the ump doesnt show up and is not allowed to play until it is heard then gets a week as part of his hearing. That players misses 2 weeks when his suspension is held up as 1 week.
Then One of our lads gets to the tribunal waits an hour and a half for the ump to get thjere and the clown doesnt show. Luckily there is a break this week but then again he might get to his hearing and get a week or more seeing that he is trying to fight the fact that he was trying to protect himself. Unless they are rediculous and/or serious reports if the umps cant be bothered to show up or even call the league to say they cant make it, the reports should be thrown out. Pure and simple.
The hireachy at the SAAFL and the umps demand this so called respect and look at what they do. The umps we had on the weekend were so called SANFL umpires. I'd hate to be those guys with what they dished out last week deliver the same types of calls at Centrals or a Magpies games for that matter. They would get torn 4 new ones let alone just one new one.
I find it interesting how the same umpires names keep popping up each week, i couldn't think of anything worse to do on a Wednesday night.
by Jetters » Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:37 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Good to see the league has really stepped up with the hearing that happen or lack there of each week. One player has his hearing suspended because the ump doesnt show up and is not allowed to play until it is heard then gets a week as part of his hearing. That players misses 2 weeks when his suspension is held up as 1 week.
Then One of our lads gets to the tribunal waits an hour and a half for the ump to get thjere and the clown doesnt show. Luckily there is a break this week but then again he might get to his hearing and get a week or more seeing that he is trying to fight the fact that he was trying to protect himself. Unless they are rediculous and/or serious reports if the umps cant be bothered to show up or even call the league to say they cant make it, the reports should be thrown out. Pure and simple.
The hireachy at the SAAFL and the umps demand this so called respect and look at what they do. The umps we had on the weekend were so called SANFL umpires. I'd hate to be those guys with what they dished out last week deliver the same types of calls at Centrals or a Magpies games for that matter. They would get torn 4 new ones let alone just one new one.
Agree SATCH if the maggots can't show the respect needed & show up at the time required then the case should be thrown out.
by Wild Thing » Sat Jun 11, 2011 10:10 am
by red strip roo » Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:46 pm
by old roo » Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:00 pm
old roo wrote:Would like to say well done to Stephen Beer from Para Hills..
Well done 300 games.. I watched it & all the boys in the B's pulled together for him 7 played really well, A 92 point win over seaton was great..
300 games, 3 time A Grade premiership player. ( 2 Runner Up )
2 time A grade B & F
2 time B grade B & F
U/17's B & F
I think 111 junior games too..
Also heard great night had by all at the club after
by red strip roo » Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:11 pm
old roo wrote:old roo wrote:Would like to say well done to Stephen Beer from Para Hills..
Well done 300 games.. I watched it & all the boys in the B's pulled together for him 7 played really well, A 92 point win over seaton was great..
300 games, 3 time A Grade premiership player. ( 2 Runner Up )
2 time A grade B & F
2 time B grade B & F
U/17's B & F
I think 111 junior games too..
Also heard great night had by all at the club after
might be a mention on grass roots this week so i hear??? Footy Chick ??
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |