SAAFL division 5 2013

[Footy Chick]

He missed a few in 2011 with injury, that much I remember.. (and lets be honest, I'm not getting any younger so remembering becomes hard work )

Madcatter, please clarify

[Catters_4eva]

He missed a few in 2011 with injury, that much I remember.. (and lets be honest, I'm not getting any younger so remembering becomes hard work )

Madcatter, please clarify

Indeed McNeill did miss a few then. Through back and hamstring injuries. He has hardly missed a beat this year. Very talented forward. However, put too much attention into one the other will carve you up. Battle of the midfields for mine. Woodville South will be up and about and expect them to go Back to Back in both grades

[shoe boy]

Where is the div 5 final? and how has Wittle been playing?

[zedman]

Where is the div 5 final? and how has Wittle been playing?

at kilburn shoe boy..and carving it up i have been told..

[Dragons]

Oops thought they were playing Westminster. Now realise Woody South. Not a college poof.

Does that make him just an uneducated poof.......

Good comment Shrek you twat.
I make no apologies for WOS having a squeaky clean tribunal record.
We still go hard at the footy and the contest. We just don't belt blokes behind play.
I know what I think is the tougher of the two.
Pull your head in with your college poof comments

[Footy Chick]

Why are you even taking it to heart - I'm a "college poof" too and I don't think anything of it.

The analogy has been around for years and anyone that takes exception to it nowdays...well, I don't want to use the word precious

[Dragons]

Why are you even taking it to heart - I'm a "college poof" too and I don't think anything of it.

The analogy has been around for years and anyone that takes exception to it nowdays...well, I don't want to use the word precious

Well that's your choice to not think anything of it. Doesn't mean I have to ignore it.
Also just because it's been around for years doesn't mean I have to like or cop it.
Shrek is a big mouth and needs to be told. There was no need to put that 'analogy' into his post, especially considering he was just blatantly wrong about the other club involved.

[Footy Chick]

I don't disagree - he does need to be told

I just didn't think anyone would be silly enough to actually take anything he says seriously.


and besides, one would have thought that you'd have better things to worry about this week.

[Dragons]

I don't disagree - he does need to be told

I just didn't think anyone would be silly enough to actually take anything he says seriously.


and besides, one would have thought that you'd have better things to worry about this week.

Perhaps that's why I took offence - I'm a nervous wreck!

[Footy Chick]

I don't disagree - he does need to be told

I just didn't think anyone would be silly enough to actually take anything he says seriously.


and besides, one would have thought that you'd have better things to worry about this week.

Perhaps that's why I took offence - I'm a nervous wreck!

Good boy, that's only natural - now go and have another nervous poo

[WOS Dragons]

I don't disagree - he does need to be told

I just didn't think anyone would be silly enough to actually take anything he says seriously.


and besides, one would have thought that you'd have better things to worry about this week.

Perhaps that's why I took offence - I'm a nervous wreck!

Good boy, that's only natural - now go and have another nervous poo

Hahaha - you don't know the half of it - think he got most of that done last week

[GEESKIP]

Well one player from Woody South wont be playing tomorrow or for half of next season.......10 games

[Hoodlum]

Ill bet the jaw will take 10 to heel fully too

[GEESKIP]

Ill bet the jaw will take 10 to heel fully too

With the amount of plates, wires and screws holding his jaw together i think it will take longer than that mate, I see on the SAAFL site that someone recieved a 19 match ban for threatening an umpire would think braking someones jaw is a much a more serious offence so 10 games he got off lightly i reckon

[Cohiba]

Ill bet the jaw will take 10 to heel fully too

With the amount of plates, wires and screws holding his jaw together i think it will take longer than that mate, I see on the SAAFL site that someone recieved a 19 match ban for threatening an umpire would think braking someones jaw is a much a more serious offence so 10 games he got off lightly i reckon

Tribunal got soft on this one......

[The Dark Knight]

Ill bet the jaw will take 10 to heel fully too

With the amount of plates, wires and screws holding his jaw together I think it will take longer than that mate, I see on the SAAFL site that someone received a 19 match ban for threatening an umpire would think braking someone's jaw is a much a more serious offence so 10 games he got off lightly I reckon

He most certainty did! That is a disgrace, how can someone that breaks someone's jaw get suspended for less games than somebody that threatened an umpire?? The penalty just doesn't fit the crime.

[HardenUp]

He most certainty did! That is a disgrace, how can someone that breaks someone's jaw get suspended for less games than somebody that threatened an umpire?? The penalty just doesn't fit the crime.[/quote]

Players should receive 12 month ban and 6-10 weeks suspended depending on case and club should be fined, cost of injured players wage while recovering plus all medical costs. 12-month ban wouldn't contribute toward total suspended games, however any future offence found guitly of, will activate further 6-10 week suspension.

This way clubs will ensure acts like this are not tolerated and players know they are on last chance when/if they come back.

[MADCATTER]

I knew the crowd was big last week but I didnt relise all you footy experts were there to see the b grade game

[Hoodlum]

Ya don't have to be an expert to know that it's a low act to bust someone's jaw professor

[MADCATTER]

122 posts mate , someone needs to get a life