marbles wrote:firstly im certain smosh & shocs, flinders parks will be nominating for div 8. plus im what makes you think TTG GG & PAC have any interest in coming to div 7 to be infected by the corroding div 7 virus??
Firstly, learn to quote brah, its not hard.
Who knows?! Who knows where clubs will and won’t want to be next year. There are plenty of C Grade clubs that enjoy the environment of D7 and the challenges it provides. Historically, yours has been one of them! And it has a proud and successful history in D7. One mediocre year (and hardly bad!) and you want to chuck the towel in. One word for that – weak.
marbles wrote: i think your over dramatizing things here to suit your own agenda
its a small shift for 1 season and if you dont win the flag or dont make the finals, then face being shifted down 1 division - your club ranking still doesnt change your still the 51st best club in the league
Bullshit! You are saying to those clubs - your entire year has been a waste. You have slogged in the rain and put your body on the line to get yourself to a Grand Final, you have sponsors on board reliant on moving up divisions, you have players and coaches on board reliant on moving up divisions, but you know what? **** you, now, we’re taking that away because …. Henley haven’t made the finals in their C Grade for the first time in years?!?! How can you possibly think that is an acceptable argument!?!?
Get out of your Henley bubble, go and visit a club in the lower-ish divisions and experience what is like trying to climb divisions and the tireless work involved to do so. Imagine telling Mawson Lakes after they had finally climbed out of D7 to get to D6 after a few years of close failure, that sorry, can’t happen, because C graders want to just play with C Graders. Oh yeah, the side that just beat you in the GF? Yeah, they’re a C Grade side.
You also put clubs at risk as, if things go as imagined, but your stupid solution somehow magically got implemented, it would mean 3 or 4 “left over” A Grade clubs – like mine - that have nowhere to play. Can you try, just try, and think about what it would mean to those clubs to effectively have no division to play in, no clear direction and ultimately doom rapidly approaching.
What is more important, a slightly more happy third grade side of an already very successful player and money laden super club … or the survival of 4 clubs with many years of rich football history?
The answer to that question will reveal a lot about you as a football person.
marbles wrote: theres no ingle farm, west croyden, rosewater, or BOS in the new div 7. the huge thrashings we see in div 6 this year wont be so common in the new div 7 next year. therell be wins available for the 4 teams you listed above, and if MP actually pay someone you may even make finals. also note wingfield could merge with flinders uni???
Sure, but the reality of trying to implement that division means screwing over several other clubs.
Your solution simply cannot work, it has way too many points of failure, it adversely affects too many whilst advantaging very few.
marbles wrote: so its not worth the extra revenue for the league to expand their portfolio??
Sure! But they don't need this terrible idea to go ahead to be able to do that.
marbles wrote: its for the benefit of 18 clubs with c & d grade teams, 18 * 50 men = 900 footballers
hahah, this is such utter bullshit, and by using numbers you have actually shot your own argument in the foot - people from your club have already indicated that they don’t want this, so even if you have say, a third of your C Grade on board with your theory (which I doubt), that would make it
8 footballers. There have been countless examples of C Grade clubs in this very thread which have said they don’t want your solution, so say even if half of them do, and it’s a third of those clubs, that makes it more like 9 clubs, with 8 blokes in them, so
72 footballers.
Compared to hmmmm about
50 other clubs with say, on average,
60 footballers in there that definitely wouldn’t want this, so
3000 footballers.
So you’re saying, lets give 72 footballers what they want, and to hell with the 3000. Is that your argument? Are you absolutely sure this is what you’re publically saying? Have a slow think about it...